Skip to main content

1-8 of 8 results for subject:"Public sector"

Member X
Lord Lyell of Markyate
Subject X
Foreign companies

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Lyell of Markyate, Lord (8)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Foreign companies (8)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I apologise for taking part in the debate now, not having been at the whole debate for medical reasons. I raise one point for clarification. The Explanatory Notes say that if these powers have to be used in an emergency—in other words, if they are brought into effect before there...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1598
House
House of Lords

I support what my noble friend has said from the Front Bench. I recognise, as the Government say, that we are in very difficult waters, but they are made more dangerous by abandoning these profound and longstanding principles, particularly regarding retrospection. I ask the Government to think most carefully again....

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1610-1
House
House of Lords

The Committee will appreciate that we are in somewhat uncharted waters—and in a sense the Government are using that argument. They are saying, ““Here we are without a chart. We might think it desperately important to do something immediately and we must be allowed to do it””. But we live...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1605
House
House of Lords

The Minister was kind enough to refer to what I said, but he said that I was talking in great generalities. We are talking about the banking and financial systems of the United Kingdom, their stability, public confidence in their stability, the protection of depositors and the protection of public...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1607
House
House of Lords

Just for myself, I am most grateful to the Minister for his clarification. He is all for retrospective legislation and that is the issue on which he stands.

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1615
House
House of Lords

I do not think that the Minister is deliberately missing the point, but I am fearful that he does not understand it. The Bill says that, "““the lapse of an order under paragraph (b) does not invalidate anything done under or in reliance on the order before the lapse””." That...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1614-5
House
House of Lords

Yes, help is coming. The point is, if when the matter eventually gets to be debated by the House, either or both Houses decline to approve the order, do things that have been done under the order remain valid or do they lapse and cease to be valid? I am...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1614
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to hear what the Minister said. This was the point that I raised when I apologised for speaking, having come late to the debate, in the very first intervention that I made. My reading of Clause 75(8)(c) is perfectly clear. If the order decides something or...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
706 c1614
House
House of Lords