Skip to main content

1-20 of 139 results for subject:Iraq

Member X
Andrew Mackinlay

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House recognises the bravery, dedication and sacrifice of members of the armed forces in Afghanistan and Iraq; applauds the recent review and enhancement of the Armed Forces' Compensation Scheme; and calls on the Government to amend the qualifying date of 6 April 2005 to 1 January 2001, which...

Primary sponsor
Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
1022
House
House of Commons

I listened carefully to the moving letter that my hon. Friend read out, and it brought it home to me that this House has never voted on the deployment of our troops in Afghanistan, especially in Helmand, despite the promises from Prime Minister Blair and the current Prime Minister that...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2009
Reference
497 c484-5
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has raised the subject of the number of Members who went in to bat today. I have been silent for a variety of reasons and I have been in and out of the Chamber, but I want to express my concern and, I think, that of many...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2009
Reference
497 c537
House
House of Commons

Or spooks—

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
494 c867
House
House of Commons

I am one of those who voted for the conflict. I have told the House before that I shall deeply regret that until the day that I die. I believe that I was hoodwinked. I also think that my judgments were unsound. I remember that we all went through a...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
494 c878-80
House
House of Commons

He doesn't understand.

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
494 c884
House
House of Commons

The Foreign Secretary and the Prime Minister are now petrified that, as some of the hearings will be in public, the inquiry will inevitably—and rightly, I think—run for longer, and that the members of it who have been invited under the old order of seven or eight days ago might...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
494 c895
House
House of Commons

Yes: independent.

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
494 c897
House
House of Commons

But there is no way to deliver that. The Prime Minister knows that, Chilcot knows it and anyone in this House with a bit of brain knows it too. Without a statutory base, there is no way that the oath can be administered so that a person who abrogates it...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
494 c899
House
House of Commons

What about the oath? Answer the point about the oath.

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2009
Reference
494 c898
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister did not answer the key question, which is, will evidence be given under oath? In this matter, there is a history of obfuscation and deliberate deceit by some agencies and individuals—proven deceit, now. Nothing short of people giving evidence under oath will be sufficient to give the...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 June 2009
Reference
494 c34
House
House of Commons

To ask the Prime Minister what plans he has to discuss the matter of the protected persons status of persons in Ashraf City, Iraq under the Geneva Conventions with the Prime Minister of Iraq during his visit to London on 30 April 2009; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 May 2009
Reference
492 c182W; 272770
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the protection of Ashraf residents under the Geneva Convention.

Lead member
Andrew Mackinlay
Answering member
Bill Rammell
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c73-92WH
House
House of Commons

The question is academic, because no country is lining up to offer immigration to the Ashraf people, although it is fair to say that they do not want to move. An immediate issue is the determination of the Iranian regime to have them back in its claws. I shall return...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c75WH
House
House of Commons

To say the least, it is highly probable that they would be executed and/or suffer appalling persecution. It is important to remember that the Foreign Office, which is very much an hereditary Foreign Office, consists of people similar to those who made the judgment in 1945 to return the Cossacks...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c75WH
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to raise this debate about the residents of Ashraf City and the obligations of the United Kingdom, and other members of the so-called coalition, to them in terms of their protected person status under the Geneva convention. I am proud, for the purposes of the debate this...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c73-5WH
House
House of Commons

The Minister is trespassing on the question of visitors. In the past few weeks, two UK citizens wanted to visit loved ones. One of them, Mr. Tabrizi, who is known to us in the parliamentary campaign committee, was turned away. There was no question of him not being able to...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c90-1WH
House
House of Commons

I listened to what the hon. Member for East Dunbartonshire (Jo Swinson) said about the Library note—I shall take a look at it—but now the hon. Gentleman has mentioned it, too. The accusation that people cannot leave Ashraf is a canard—I use that word against not them but the Iranian...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c87WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. The anxiety of my colleagues in the campaign is that the utterances by Iranian leaders are having an impact on the fragile and split Government in Baghdad. The national security adviser, al-Rubaie, goes on to say that the people of Ashraf""do not enjoy the…humanitarian status of refugees. They do...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c76-8WH
House
House of Commons

I see; then I shall conclude, because I think that I have painted a pretty good canvas to show what the position is. We look to the British Government to respond. I hope that we can send this morning a signal from the United Kingdom House of Commons to people...

Member
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c78WH
House
House of Commons