1-10 of 10 results for subject:Iraq
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.213 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.008 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Iraq
- We searched for
- subject_t:Iraq OR subject_ses:11044
Member
X
Lord Mandelson
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
My Lords, that issue was raised during my business delegation visit to Iraq and I am following it up. There is some resistance in view of the considerable risks involved. However, I think that it would be a great shame if through the absence of ECGD cover we were to lose important commercial opportunities which would be of as great a benefit to the Iraqi people and their commercial objectives as they would be to our businesses in this country.
My Lords, that issue was raised during my business delegation visit to Iraq and I am following it up. There is some resistance in view of the considerable risks involved. However, I think that it would be a great shame if through the absence of ECGD cover we were to lose important commercial opportunities which would be of as great a benefit to the Iraqi people and their commercial objectives as they would be to our businesses in this country.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord James of Blackheath
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, can the Minister indicate whether Iraq is a designated area for support from ECGD for any contracts that are won by British companies?
Subjects
Contracts; Armed forces; Arms trade; Defence equipment; Iraq; Procurement
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
710 c8
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I appreciate the sentiment expressed by the noble Lord, but he is slightly understating the presence and activity of UK representatives in this matter. None the less, it is the case that there is a clear Iraqi preference to make procurement for its Armed Forces through United States foreign military sales. Indeed, you could say that they are rather dependent on a foreign military sales system because it is easier for them. However, they are making moves towards direct contracts with other countries and we will be encouraging that.
My Lords, I appreciate the sentiment expressed by the noble Lord, but he is slightly understating the presence and activity of UK representatives in this matter. None the less, it is the case that there is a clear Iraqi preference to make procurement for its Armed Forces through United States foreign military sales. Indeed, you could say that they are rather dependent on a foreign military sales system because it is easier for them. However, they are making moves towards direct contracts with other countries and we will be encouraging that.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Astor of Hever
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for that reply. As a main coalition partner, our Armed Forces have made huge sacrifices in Iraq, yet we have sat back and watched the Americans walk away with one of the biggest rearmament and rebuilding programmes ever seen, leaving us with virtually nothing. What representation does DSO have in Iraq, and with billions of dollars of future sales expected, will it now take a more dynamic official role in promoting British companies there?
Subjects
Contracts; Armed forces; Arms trade; Defence equipment; Iraq; Procurement
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
710 c7
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, support to the United Kingdom defence industry in bidding for contracts for the re-equipment of the Iraqi armed forces is provided by United Kingdom Trade and Investment staff and our defence attaché in Baghdad. Her Majesty’s Armed Forces in Iraq are responsible for providing support to the Iraqi security forces and are not involved in equipment procurement issues.
My Lords, support to the United Kingdom defence industry in bidding for contracts for the re-equipment of the Iraqi armed forces is provided by United Kingdom Trade and Investment staff and our defence attaché in Baghdad. Her Majesty’s Armed Forces in Iraq are responsible for providing support to the Iraqi security forces and are not involved in equipment procurement issues.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Astor of Hever
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they have taken to use contacts between Her Majesty’s Armed Forces in Iraq and the Iraqi authorities to support the United Kingdom defence industry in bidding for contracts for the re-equipment of the Iraqi armed forces.
Subjects
Contracts; Armed forces; Arms trade; Defence equipment; Iraq; Procurement
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
710 c6-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, the noble Lord is right that we have included representatives of this sector in many of UKTI’s activities. Indeed, on my recent visit to Iraq, I was accompanied in the business delegation that I led by a number of company representatives from this sector. In answer to the noble Lord’s specific question on translators, he makes an important and interesting suggestion. I will look into it and I will write to him.
My Lords, the noble Lord is right that we have included representatives of this sector in many of UKTI’s activities. Indeed, on my recent visit to Iraq, I was accompanied in the business delegation that I led by a number of company representatives from this sector. In answer to the noble Lord’s specific question on translators, he makes an important and interesting suggestion. I will look into it and I will write to him.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Lee of Trafford
(Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, I gather that the defence industry is grateful for the noble Lord’s efforts to include defence equipment in the MoU that is, as I understand it, being negotiated between our Government and the Iraqi Government. However, I have talked with the Defence Manufacturers Association and it believes that there is a particular problem with the translation and language aspect, particularly for our smaller defence-equipment exporting companies. Is there any possibility of reinvolving for mutual benefit the Iraqis who were interpreters for our forces, some of whom were brought out of Iraq?
Subjects
Contracts; Armed forces; Arms trade; Defence equipment; Iraq; Procurement
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
710 c7-8
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I do not think that there is any evidence to suggest that since the transfer of responsibilities and location for DSO there has been any diminution in its work rate or effectiveness. I think that it is actually quite desirable to extend and deepen the expertise of UKTI as a whole in both the defence and the security fields. However, if there is a concern, it is one that I will watch out for with a personal interest.
My Lords, I do not think that there is any evidence to suggest that since the transfer of responsibilities and location for DSO there has been any diminution in its work rate or effectiveness. I think that it is actually quite desirable to extend and deepen the expertise of UKTI as a whole in both the defence and the security fields. However, if there is a concern, it is one that I will watch out for with a personal interest.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, is not one of the problems the fact that DSO no longer exists and the very specialised work that it undertook is now being undertaken by UKTI? What assessment is being done to look at whether UKTI is as effective as DSO used to be, with the support that it had from the Armed Forces, in promoting British defence companies in the sort of way that the noble Lord’s Question implies?
Subjects
Contracts; Armed forces; Arms trade; Defence equipment; Iraq; Procurement
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
710 c7
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I appreciate the noble Lord’s point, and I am sure that the link is an important one. However, the link has not been lost in DSO’s movement from the MoD to UKTI. I think that a rather well integrated and seamless operation is still being mounted. I will personally take an interest in this to ensure that that seamless operation is maintained in the future, as it has been in the past.
My Lords, I appreciate the noble Lord’s point, and I am sure that the link is an important one. However, the link has not been lost in DSO’s movement from the MoD to UKTI. I think that a rather well integrated and seamless operation is still being mounted. I will personally take an interest in this to ensure that that seamless operation is maintained in the future, as it has been in the past.
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
My Lords, does the Minister accept that one of the questions always asked by people who might buy British defence equipment is whether it is being used by the British forces? That is why the link between DSO and the Ministry of Defence was so essential in the past. It is very difficult to get that link working when it is in another department.
Subjects
Contracts; Armed forces; Arms trade; Defence equipment; Iraq; Procurement
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
710 c8
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they have taken to use contacts between Her Majesty’s Armed Forces in Iraq and the Iraqi authorities to support the United Kingdom defence industry in bidding for contracts for the re-equipment of the Iraqi armed forces.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they have taken to use contacts between Her Majesty’s Armed Forces in Iraq and the Iraqi authorities to support the United Kingdom defence industry in bidding for contracts for the re-equipment of the Iraqi armed forces.
Asked by
Lord Astor of Hever
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
27 April 2009
Answered on
27 April 2009
My Lords, support to the United Kingdom defence industry in bidding for contracts for the re-equipment of the Iraqi armed forces is provided by United Kingdom Trade and Investment staff and our defence attaché in Baghdad. Her Majesty’s Armed Forces in Iraq are responsible for providing support to the Iraqi security forces and are not involved in equipment procurement issues.
Subjects
Contracts; Armed forces; Arms trade; Defence equipment; Iraq; Procurement
Date
27 April 2009
Reference
710 c6-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Supplementary on foreign investment and tax policies introduced in Iraq by the interim authorities and contribution to reconstruction by British government.
Supplementary on foreign investment and tax policies introduced in Iraq by the interim authorities and contribution to reconstruction by British government.
Asked by
Lord Mandelson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for International Development
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
15 October 2003
Subjects
Iraq; Foreign investment
Date
15 October 2003
Reference
411 c104
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
That this House condemns the decision of the Government to change the service debate on the Royal Air Force to a debate on events in the Gulf without making provision for a separate Royal Air Force debate; regards as incredible any suggestion that discussing these two subjects in one debate, on a motion that the House should adjourn, can do justice to either; notes that the last Royal Air Force debate was in May 1991 and that the July 1992 Defence Estimates have yet to be debated; is alarmed that a pattern of declining opportunities for Parliamentary debate appears to be developing at a time of immense change in British defence requirements and priorities; regards the Government's effective emasculation of the Royal Air Force debate as indicative of this pattern, and as an insult to the Royal Air Force as it approaches its 75th anniversary; and demands that provision be made for a Royal Air Force debate in Government time as soon as possible.
That this House condemns the decision of the Government to change the service debate on the Royal Air Force to a debate on events in the Gulf without making provision for a separate Royal Air Force debate; regards as incredible any suggestion that discussing these two subjects in one debate,...
Primary sponsor
Mike Gapes
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Early day motions
Subjects
Armed conflict; Air force; Iraq
Date
27 January 1993
Reference
1256
House
House of Commons
That this House notes with concern that with the onset of severe winter conditions over 6.6 million refugees, displaced and other war affected people in former Yugoslavia, northern Iraq and Afghanistan are in need of emergency aid and protection and that there is a shortfall of over $700 million in funding for the United Nations emergency appeals for these countries which increases the threat to these people; notes with concern that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has warned that hundreds of thousands of people could die unless more aid is provided; welcomes the efforts being made by the UNPROFOR to convoy aid in Bosnia, but is concerned at the lack of protection for people fleeing from the conflict; welcomes the launch by OXFAM of its Cold Front Appeal for victims of cold and conflict; and calls on the Government to immediately and substantially increase its contributon to the United Nations appeals and to press for a broader mandate for the UNPROFOR to enable it to provide protection to civilians fleeing th conflict in Bosnia.
That this House notes with concern that with the onset of severe winter conditions over 6.6 million refugees, displaced and other war affected people in former Yugoslavia, northern Iraq and Afghanistan are in need of emergency aid and protection and that there is a shortfall of over $700 million in...
Primary sponsor
Jim Lester
(Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Subjects
Armed conflict; Development aid; Iraq; Refugees; Afghanistan; Yugoslavia; UN Protection Force; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Oxfam
Date
11 December 1992
Reference
1059
House
House of Commons