Skip to main content

1-11 of 11 results for subject:Dissolution

Member X
Lord Martin of Springburn

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Martin of Springburn, Lord (11)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank the noble Lord, but it is my understanding that the five years was a facility given by this Government so that there would be no clash with other elections. Four years was the norm. The five years was an accommodation that suited this Government.

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c796
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for being patient with me. The noble Lord, Lord Marks, was kind enough to say that proceedings shall not be challenged. It is important that the Minister goes away to consider this and perhaps consults the noble Baroness, Lady Boothroyd, and myself on our experience. I...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1150
House
House of Lords

Mr Harper perhaps overlooks the fact that any Speaker always has at his or her side the Clerk of the House and takes their advice. I grant that it is advice and that, at the end of the day, it is the Speaker who has to make the decision. However,...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1145
House
House of Lords

I have heard the Minister say on earlier amendments that if they were withdrawn, he would take them back and give serious consideration to the views that had been expressed. The amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, are similar. Perhaps they can be taken back and considered seriously,...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1139-40
House
House of Lords

I am very interested in the amendment and agree a great deal with the noble Lords, Lord Cormack and Lord Armstrong, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Howe. A common argument put here is that we did not need a fixed-term Parliaments Bill. I come from engineering. My foreman...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1196-9
House
House of Lords

If the House wants me to cease speaking I will do so. I am sorry—the noble Lord has put me off, but I think he will get my point in a moment. I will try not to take so long the next time I speak. If a Speaker has to...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1199
House
House of Lords

I cannot speak for what is going on in the other place at the moment. However, if my memory serves me correctly, the Minister followed Jo Grimond into the House of Commons in 1983, so he will appreciate as a former Scottish Member that on a Thursday there were votes...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c509
House
House of Lords

I agree with the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Stirrup, about the length of the period between elections in normal times. If it is agreed that five years will be written into legislation, over a period of 20 years the electorate will be denied an opportunity to go to the...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c483-5
House
House of Lords

I am at a loss to understand why the Government do not go for four years. Another feature about a fifth year is that everyone will be in the doldrums. Members of Parliament will not stay in the Chamber. They will be campaigning in their constituencies. That will be a...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c225
House
House of Lords

Can I make the point that going beyond four years can be a double-edged sword for a Prime Minister? Margaret Thatcher was very shrewd in how she went after a strict four years, as was Tony Blair. We have seen what happened with five years, so it does not always...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c223
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a worry about the idea of a five-year Parliament. My experience of the other place was that when there was a four-year Parliament, although there were arguments between Back-Benchers and their own government leaders—the Executive—and between parties, at least the electorate had an opportunity to sort...

Member
Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c221-2
House
House of Lords