Skip to main content

1-20 of 27 results for subject:Trident

Member X
Baroness May of Maidenhead
Session X
2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

May of Maidenhead, Baroness (27)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank my hon. Friend for his kind remarks. I join him in enthusiastically welcoming the vote taken in this House on Monday evening to renew our nuclear deterrent. I think that vote showed the commitment of this House: it showed that we have not only committed to our own national security, but considered the security of European and NATO allies. We can now get on with the essential job of renewing

our nuclear deterrent. May I thank the 140 Labour Members of Parliament who put the national interest first and voted to renew the nuclear deterrent?

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 July 2016
Reference
613 c816
House
House of Commons

I say that it is not a choice. This country needs to recognise that it faces a variety of threats and ensure that we have the capabilities that are necessary and appropriate to deal with each of them. As the Home Secretary has just made clear in response to questions...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c562
House
House of Commons

I would like to make a little progress before I take more interventions.

I know that there are a number of serious and very important questions at the heart of this debate, and I want to address them all this afternoon. First, in the light of the evolving nature of the...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c562
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention and for the support that he and his colleagues will show tonight.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c562
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. Of course, the last Labour Government held votes in this House on the retention of the nuclear deterrent. It is a great pity that there are Members on the Labour Front Bench who fail to see the necessity of the nuclear deterrent, given that...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 cc562-3
House
House of Commons

I am going to make some progress. North Korea is the only country in the world to have tested nuclear weapons this century, carrying out its fourth test this year, as well as a space launch that used ballistic missile technology. It also claims to be attempting to develop a...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c563
House
House of Commons

I am happy to do so. If the right hon. Gentleman will allow me to finish this section of my speech, I will come on to the cost in a minute. Britain is going to leave the European Union, but we are not leaving Europe, and we will not leave...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c564
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend, and I think he is right to point out that there are Opposition Members who support that view. Sadly, not many of them seem to be on the Front Bench, but perhaps my speech will change the views of some of the Front...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c564
House
House of Commons

I have given the figures for the cost of building the submarines. I am also clear that the in-service cost is about 6% of the defence budget, or

about 13p in every £100 of Government spending. There is also a significant economic benefit to the renewal of our nuclear deterrent,...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c564
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an incredibly important point. Our nuclear defence industry makes a major contribution to our defence industrial base. It supports more than 30,000 jobs across the United Kingdom, and benefits hundreds of suppliers across more than 350 constituencies. The skills required in this industry, whether in engineering...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c565
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very important point. Some constituencies—obviously, Morecambe and Lunesdale, and Barrow and Furness—are particularly affected by this, but as I have just said, there are jobs across about 350 constituencies in this country that are related to this industry. If we were not going to renew...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c565
House
House of Commons

I will give way to the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Tom Brake), and then I will make some progress.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c565
House
House of Commons

I will come on to the whole question of nuclear proliferation a little later, if the right hon. Gentleman will just hold his fire.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c565
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. This is about jobs here in the United Kingdom, and it is also about the development of skills here in the United Kingdom that will be of benefit to our engineering and design base for many years to come.

The decision will also specifically increase...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c566
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman might have noticed that the Government have looked at the Government procurement arrangements in relation to steel. Obviously, where British steel is good value, we would want it to be used. For the hon. Gentleman’s confirmation, I have been in Wales this morning and one of the...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 cc566-7
House
House of Commons

I could not agree more with my right hon. Friend; he put that very well indeed.

Let me turn to the issue of whether we could simply rely on other nuclear armed allies such as America and France to provide our deterrent. The first question is how would America and France...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c567
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a valid and important point, and this issue must be looked at in the round, not just as one set of figures.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c567
House
House of Commons

The answer to that is yes—we are very clear that we face different threats and need different capabilities to face them. We have now committed

to 2% of GDP being spent on defence, and we have increased the defence budget and the money that we spend on more conventional forces.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c567
House
House of Commons

Yes. The whole point of a deterrent is that our enemies need to know that we would be prepared to use it, unlike the suggestion that we could have a nuclear deterrent but not actually be willing to use it, which seemed to come from the Labour Front Bench.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c568
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is absolutely right. As I pointed out earlier, Russia is also modernising its nuclear capability. It would be a dereliction of our duty, in terms of our responsibility for the safety and security of the British people, if we were to give up our nuclear deterrent.

We must...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c568
House
House of Commons