Skip to main content

1-20 of 176 results for subject:"Public sector"

Member X
Lord McKenzie of Luton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
McKenzie of Luton, Lord (176)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The noble Baroness paints a bleak picture; I do not doubt that she is absolutely right.

Is there not a role in all this for the auditors, and a body whose feet can be held to the flames for not doing its job and not checking the systems, for example? It...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2020
Reference
802 c230GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment goes to the heart of protecting people’s pensions. We have touched upon a number of issues surrounding the same sort of concepts during debate on the Bill and in other legislation, such as financial guidance provisions. We should see whether we cannot get together a comprehensive...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2020
Reference
802 cc248-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are three amendments in this group. Amendment 78, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Altmann, focuses on the evidence of a member’s spouse’s consent when a transfer is to be made. We believe that this amendment has considerable merit and are supportive of it. Quite...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2020
Reference
802 c243GC
House
House of Lords

My question related to Amendment 77 and unfunded public service DB schemes where there is a requirement for prescribed conditions to be satisfied before trustees or managers can use the cash equivalent. I sought to determine what those prescribed conditions might be.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2020
Reference
802 c244GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord Best, on securing this debate and the usual forensic manner in which he has introduced it.

It is fitting that we should focus on the performance of private sector housebuilders at a time when the headlines in the financial press, to which the noble...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2018
Reference
788 cc316-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendments 35K and 35S. These amend Clause 38, which currently provides for the Secretary of State or the Minister for the Cabinet Office to make regulations imposing duties on contracting authorities in relation to procurement functions. Ministers would have the power to issue...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
758 cc179-182GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendments 86, 87 and 88, while my noble friend Lady Royall will address Amendment 89 in particular.

We are supportive of the thrust of the arrangements to ease complexity, bureaucracy and cost in marshalling surplus public sector assets, but we accept what the Government...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2014
Reference
755 cc220-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a straightforward amendment that would require the regulations specifying public bodies to be subject to the affirmative procedure. These provisions are focused on identifying which public bodies’ assets can be the subject of a scheme for transfer to the HCA. In other amendments, we have just...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2014
Reference
755 c229GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as others have described, this is a hotchpotch of a Bill with important chunks still missing—perhaps more than we thought—and key related consultation processes still running their course or with conclusions yet undisclosed. In infrastructure parlance, the Bill could hardly be called shovel ready. Therefore, we have an...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2014
Reference
754 cc888-892
House
House of Lords

If it is not the intention to seek privatisation by this mechanism, can the Minister confirm that it is not the Government’s intention to seek it in any other legislative arrangement?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2014
Reference
754 c899
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as my noble friend Lady Turner has just said, this is an important Bill which covers a major area of public policy: how we provide for and treat our citizens in retirement, the extent to which we expect them to make provision themselves through their lifetime and how...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 December 2013
Reference
750 cc180-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like other noble Lords I start by welcoming the noble Baroness, Lady Stowell, to her new role, and offering our congratulations on a promotion thoroughly deserved. Like other noble Lords, I also say that we on these Benches will miss the good humour and engagement of the noble...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 October 2013
Reference
748 cc235-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, would like to thank my noble friend Lady Whitaker for the chance to discuss, albeit briefly, the report of the Future Homes Commission. As the noble Lord, Lord Best, said, it is one of a string of important reports on housing that we have received recently....

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2012
Reference
741 cc627-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for moving this amendment. We were not quite clear what was behind it but he has been very clear about the thrust of the amendment. We support its general direction, which is about protecting open space, particularly urban open space. I...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
728 c1670-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak to Amendments 117ZA and 117ZB, to Amendments 110A and 114A, to which we have added our name, and to the other amendments in this group. This has been a fascinating debate but there seems to be one very clear strand that I think that pretty much...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
728 c1689-92
House
House of Lords

I understand that point. My specific question was whether those four areas that I identified are of particular concern at the moment, and in respect of those areas, how far, if at all, the early stages of infraction proceedings have got.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
728 c1695
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords will be grateful for the response that the Minister has made because he has indicated that this is very much open and there is scope for a lot of further detailed discussion. Can I be clear that included in that discussion will be issues around the point at...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
728 c1699
House
House of Lords

I know the Minister has gone through a lot this evening on this. It is not just a question of designating so that you know that you are potentially in the frame; it is an opportunity for a local authority to engage with the Government, who are obviously responsible for...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
728 c1699
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we understand why the smaller of the amendments has been introduced tonight. Doubtless the Minister will be able to give satisfaction on the date that these provisions enter into force for the reasons the noble Baroness has outlined. We also understand better now why she has attached tax...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
728 c1704-5
House
House of Lords

Just so that we can tick off this item as we go along, my amendment to include the business rate would still be qualified by ““set by it””. It would not cover NNDR, which are set nationally by the national multiplier, and would come into effect only if circumstances arose...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2011
Reference
728 c1728
House
House of Lords