Skip to main content

1-20 of 507 results for subject:"Social security"

Member X
Lord McKenzie of Luton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

McKenzie of Luton, Lord (507)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing these regulations. As we have heard, they seek to address deficiencies in retained law caused by the UK withdrawing from the EU. They amend the retained EU regulations comprising the co-ordination regulations, which currently co-ordinate social security systems throughout the EU.

Given that...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2019
Reference
796 cc554-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this short debate initiated by the noble Lord, Lord Bird, and applaud his persistence in keeping the issues of poverty and disadvantage before this House. As others have said, poverty is a multifaceted issue, disadvantage perhaps more so. We have a wealth of data to help...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2017
Reference
787 cc1720-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the Minister announced at the start of the debate, we have a Financial Guidance and Claims Bill on which we commence our parliamentary scrutiny next week. Without pre-empting that process, I will use my brief time to talk to some issues surrounding or arising from that legislation.

The...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2017
Reference
783 cc640-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking the Minister for repeating the Statement, although it is a Statement that is, frankly, thinner than we would have hoped.

We support the ambition to halve the disability employment gap, the clear pathway to its attainment, and the proposition that we have debated on endless...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 October 2016
Reference
776 cc483-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his explanation of Amendment 5. It makes the drafting of this area somewhat less impenetrable. I was going to say that it would be churlish, given the occasion, to point out that this is the third or fourth attempt to get this drafting...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2016
Reference
768 cc2130-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we support Amendment 1 for the reasons advanced with conviction by the noble Baroness, Lady Campbell, strongly supported by the noble Lord, Lord Low, and

pretty much every other Peer who has spoken in this debate so far. We heard from the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey, about the...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 cc1038-1041
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord McKenzie of Luton

27: Clause 7, page 9, line 39, at end insert—

“( ) After subsection (11) insert—

“( ) Persons who have been placed in temporary accommodation by a local authority which has found them to be in priority need as defined in section 189(2) of the Housing Act...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1132
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 27 stands in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Sherlock. This is also a rerun of an amendment that we moved in Committee, then part of a trio of similar amendments, so I will be brief.

The amendment would cause those families to be outwith...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 cc1132-3
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his reply. None of it was a surprise, and I will, of course, withdraw the amendment in due course. I would just like to ask the Minister a few questions. He said that if there were a blanket exemption, this would prolong the stay of...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1134
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for that. I will read the record, but I am not sure that I would agree with the proposition about local authorities not wanting to move people into more permanent accommodation as quickly as they can, and away from temporary accommodation, which is expensive...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1134
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord McKenzie of Luton

31: Clause 9, page 11, line 32, leave out from “to” to end of line 33 and insert “be reviewed annually by the Secretary of State having regard to—

(a) the rate of inflation, and

(b) the national economic situation.”

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1136
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 31 in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Sherlock, I shall speak to our other amendments in this group. Noble Lords will be aware that this is also a rerun of the amendments discussed in Committee. We found the Government’s arguments on...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 cc1136-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for her response. If the Government are to be in surplus in 2019-20, why is it necessary for any benefits freeze to extend into that year, whatever the rationale for earlier years? The noble Baroness said that there are no cash losers, but...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1140
House
House of Lords

Is that it? Given the hour I think there is no point in pursuing this, except to ask whether, on that point, there is nothing further the Government wish to say to my noble friend Lord MacKenzie in relation to those people who find themselves in the support group and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1140
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are clearly not going to make much further progress this evening. In the circumstances, I beg leave to withdraw this amendment but it is deeply disappointing that this issue of the support group has been dealt with in this way.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 c1141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an interesting group of amendments. If I heard correctly from each of the speakers, the thrust of it is that government should be entitled to a whole range of information that will best inform it across the piece as to how to tackle a range of...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 cc1070-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment has been moved very comprehensively by my noble friend Lady Lister and spoken to by the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Durham, to whom I should say that the closest I got to Oxford on Sunday night was watching “Endeavour” on television. This is a...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2016
Reference
768 cc1090-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we thank the Minister, the noble Baroness, Lady Evans, for her introduction and we are grateful for the separate briefing that we received before Christmas with her colleague, the noble Baroness, Lady Williams. This is a very substantial list of government amendments, but we will not oppose them,...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2016
Reference
768 cc203-6
House
House of Lords

Can I just press the Minister a bit to say what “in due course” means? Can we narrow that timeline a bit? For example, is it likely to occur before we get to Report?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2016
Reference
768 c207
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this debate focusing on six specific amendments has become quite broad and—dare I say it?—welcome. The noble Lord, Lord Kerslake, kicked us off by reminding us of the background to the policy—in particular, pointing out that it is a complete reversal of CPI plus 1%, with its 10-year...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2016
Reference
768 cc223-5
House
House of Lords