1-3 of 3 results for subject:Forgery
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.199 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Forgery
- We searched for
- subject_t:Forgery OR subject_ses:91337
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
That this House notes the case of Paul Hamilton of Barrow in Furness; notes that Paul Hamilton is yet another innocent victim of JHP training; believes that JHP fraudulently produced an assessment sheet falsifying information as to training that did not take place; notes that this fraudulent document was submitted to Cumbria TEC who, having made payments to JHP, were subsequently alerted by people in Barrow to irregularities; notes that Cumbria TEC once again took an early decision to carry out an investigation; notes that in an attempt to cover up the abuse of taxpayers' money a representative of JHP pursued Paul Hamilton's employers for signatures on time sheets; congratulates this employer for his honesty and integrity in refusing to become part of what in effect is a criminal offence; believes that pressure being exerted by senior JHP personnel on JHP's operating centres leads to questionable professional standards; believes that a national NVQ system that rewards training agents with lump sum completion payments on certification invites fraud unless adequately monitored; and believes that the NAO should undertake full and comprehensive inquiry into NVQ training as inadequacies in systems are proving immensely frustrating for the many thousands of honourable and decent people who work in training nationally and in JHP centres throughout the country.
That this House notes the case of Paul Hamilton of Barrow in Furness; notes that Paul Hamilton is yet another innocent victim of JHP training; believes that JHP fraudulently produced an assessment sheet falsifying information as to training that did not take place; notes that this fraudulent document was submitted...
That this House notes that following a detailed investigation by the honourable Member for Workington, fraudulent diplomas and documents issued by JHP have been identified; believes that this documentation forms only part of a large volume of similar material held by the company nationally; believes that a detailed enquiry into JHP operations will reveal, the extensive forgery of trainee and trainer signatures, the theft of public money, the submission of falsified documentation and attendance records to TEC officials, unreasonable pressure having been exerted on employees, the deliberate misleading of the national examination boards, the alteration of trainee work records prior to assessment and verification, the pursuit of training targets for the purpose of maximising profit, the use of questionable activities with regard to verification procedures, the creation of phantom trainees for the purpose of cheating the taxpayer, the generation of fictional trainee timesheets, the holding of award certification prior to the completion of training, and the premature departure of trainees in disgust over the quality of training; believes that JHP local, regional and national personnel have been made aware of these practices in internal reports and meetings; believes that the indifference of the company to such allegations, apart from the discreet termination of a few employee contracts, only serves to indicate how widespread has been the fraud; and expreses thanks to Cumbria TEC for being helpful and open during the course of the honourable Member for Workington's enquiry and for the recent work carried out on quality standards in relation to JHP.
That this House notes that following a detailed investigation by the honourable Member for Workington, fraudulent diplomas and documents issued by JHP have been identified; believes that this documentation forms only part of a large volume of similar material held by the company nationally; believes that a detailed enquiry into...
That this House calls for a full inquiry by the National Audit Office under section 9 of the National Audit Act 1938, and by the Runcorn-based Internal Audit Unit at the Employment Department into the activities of JHP Training Limited, of Foleshill, Coventry, associate company of Pitman Personnel and Pitman Sumlock; notes that JHP has a national network of 65 training centres; notes that in July 1993 JHP fraudulently misled the Pitman's Examination Institute into issuing an NVQ business administration level 2 diploma certificate number PE13046 in the name of Mr Gareth Marshall, a constituent of the honourable Member for Workington; notes that Mr Marshall, who never received the award, and who was never made aware of its existence, strongly objected to his name being used in the committing of this criminal offence; believes that the Pitman's Examination Institute is an innocent victim of this fraud carried out by senior JHP personnel; advises Martin Cross, the Chief Executive of the RSA examination board, that his organisation has also been used in similar circumstances by JHP; believes that such actions totally undermine the NVQ awards system in the United Kingdom; calls upon the PEI and RSA, in defence of their high reputations to consider bringing civil proceedings for damages against JHP and for the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute those involved at the highest level under the criminal law; and notes that the papers in the possession of the honourable Member for Workington are available to the investigating bodies.
That this House calls for a full inquiry by the National Audit Office under section 9 of the National Audit Act 1938, and by the Runcorn-based Internal Audit Unit at the Employment Department into the activities of JHP Training Limited, of Foleshill, Coventry, associate company of Pitman Personnel and Pitman...