Skip to main content

1-20 of 222 results for subject:Marriage

Member X
Maria Miller

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Miller, Maria (222)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Let me start by thanking my right hon. Friend the Minister for the constructive way in which he has engaged with the Bill since its Second Reading. In the interests of time, I will confine my comments to the two amendments that I have tabled, which have cross-party support and...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2023
Reference
742 cc110-1
House
House of Commons

I think it goes to the heart of the case when someone with such extensive experience endorses a change of approach, and my right hon. and learned Friend is entirely right. The new clause calls for a change that would transfer the decision to release records to a judge, but...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2023
Reference
742 c111
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1026
House
House of Commons

The title of this Bill might be “Marriage”, but its fabric is about freedom and respect: freedom to marry regardless of sexuality or gender, but also freedom to believe that marriage should be of one man with one woman and not be marginalised. It provides clear affirmation that as a...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1026
House
House of Commons

If my hon. Friend will give me a moment to make a little more progress, then of course I will give way.

The amendments were tabled in response to questions asked in this House by my hon. Friend the Member for Enfield, Southgate (Mr Burrowes) and those in the other place...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 cc1026-7
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for making sure that we pay tribute to those on both sides of the debate, whether it be my hon. Friend the Member for Enfield, Southgate or my hon. Friend the Member for East Worthing and Shoreham (Tim Loughton). They have all played their part...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 cc1027-8
House
House of Commons

I know that my hon. Friend raises that point for legitimate reasons: he wants to make sure that the House has clarification, and I respect that. I refer him back to the lengthy debate on this issue in Committee, where it was decided that further reassurance or clarification was not...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1028
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman, who sat on the Committee, makes a strong point, but we have to recognise that people require reassurance. My hon. Friend the Member for Peterborough (Mr Jackson) has sought that reassurance and I hope he will join me in supporting the amendment to the Public Order Act...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1028
House
House of Commons

As always, my hon. Friend makes a powerful comment. I hope that she is right that this lays to rest those concerns. My hon. Friend the Member for Gainsborough (Sir Edward Leigh) said from a sedentary position that that was not the case, so perhaps I could give him an...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1029
House
House of Commons

I do not think that my hon. Friend heard me right. I said that there are provisions in the Bill and the decision about whether they should be used will be made as and when any problems arise. My hon. Friend is right that any issues that arise can be...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1029
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr Speaker, for that guidance. As always, you are extremely helpful. I would never want to be ahead of myself, particularly not when discussing this Bill.

The powers in paragraph 27 of schedule 4 are very specific. They are safeguarding powers to prevent the Bill from having a greater...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1029
House
House of Commons

Thank you for bringing me into order, Mr Speaker. I would like to move on to Lords amendments 41 to 44, because the Bill also introduces—[Interruption.]

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1030
House
House of Commons

I think that we should turn the House’s attention to amendments 41 to 44 before we become more sidetracked.

The Bill introduces an important advance for trans people who wish for their marriages to continue after seeking gender recognition. We have made a number of amendments to achieve that. First, Lords...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 cc1030-1
House
House of Commons

My view of marriage is clearly that fidelity can be extremely important. This is something on which my hon. Friend and I would very much agree. It can be a commitment between two individuals on, one would hope, a lifelong basis. I think he and I would share the importance...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1031
House
House of Commons

I apologise for interrupting my hon. Friend’s speech, but it is important that the House is aware that registrars do not wish to have any sort of provision. They perform a public function and they believe it is very important that they do so without any sort of dispensation. [Interruption.]

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c1050
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
563 c1077
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
563 c1078
House
House of Commons

I would not normally intervene on the hon. Lady, but she said that Government officials had advised her in a certain way, and I wanted to make clear that they did not advise the narrowing of the new clause. They drew attention to the problems with the earlier amendment, which—I...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
563 c1078
House
House of Commons

I am sorry, but I must complete what the letter sent by the Under-Secretary of State for Justice, my hon. Friend the Member for Maidstone and The Weald (Mrs Grant), said. It went on to state clearly that

“the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill is the wrong mechanism to effect the...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
563 c1112
House
House of Commons

We have had a robust and impassioned debate on a subject about which people feel very strongly. I must make it clear from the start that it is not, and continues not to be, the objective of this Bill to extend marriage to belief groups, which is, to all intents...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
563 cc1115-6
House
House of Commons