Skip to main content

1-17 of 17 results for subject:Trident

Member X
Tessa Munt

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Munt, Tessa (17)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Will the hon. Gentleman explain why today’s edition of The Times carries a headline that reads “Labour could cut Trident fleet after review suggests this would save £1.7bn”?

Member
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
566 c1227
House
House of Commons
What is the point of having a review if no one, except a select few, has an opportunity to look at its findings? Should not the Liberal Democrats, in particular, be allowed some access to that information? [Interruption.]
Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 December 2011
Reference
537 c1045
House
House of Commons

I apologise for not having declared that I have membership of CND at Mid Somerset level and I am vice-chair of that organisation. I should have said that earlier.

Member
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2011
Reference
537 c141WH
House
House of Commons

As a Liberal Democrat, I remain absolutely committed to my belief that this is a ludicrous waste of money. I am boiling with anger at the fact that, despite an alternatives review having been commissioned, it will not be published. There is no basis for not publishing it so that...

Member
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2011
Reference
537 c140-1WH
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will agree that the Minister will have to explain that in that case—it would seem to me—the costs are not known, and it is neither feasible nor credible for us to have the particular scheme.

Member
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2011
Reference
537 c144WH
House
House of Commons
It would appear from the answers to freedom of information requests that the steel, the computer systems and the combat systems, among other things, for the first submarine have been ordered and will have been paid for. It also appears that the three reactors for the first three submarines will have been ordered and paid for before MPs can scrutinise the main gate business case. What will remain unspent for the first submarines? Will we be so financially committed that the whole main gate decision is made irrelevant?
Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2011
Reference
522 c581
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) on what date he expects to present to Parliament the full results of the Trident value for money report;

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2010
Reference
20721; 520 c283W
House
House of Commons

(2) if he will ensure that Parliament is given the opportunity to review the Trident value for money report and the strategic defence and security review before any contracts for the Future Submarine programme are placed.

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 December 2010
Reference
20850; 520 c283W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence by what mechanism his Department has achieved cost savings in joint work with the US to procure a common missile compartment for the planned successor submarine; and how much funding has been allocated by his Department to the common missile compartment project...

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 December 2010
Reference
27414; 520 c227W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the cost of replacing Trident in current prices.

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 November 2010
Reference
27413; 519 c752W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects to enter into contractual arrangements for long-lead items on the Future Submarine Programme; what estimate he has made of the total cost of such items; what assessment he has made of the capability of such arrangements with arrangements for...

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 November 2010
Reference
20719; 517 c958W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects to present to Parliament the annual Trident cost report to update the 2006 White Paper estimate of the capital costs of building a replacement for the Trident nuclear weapons system and the cost of operating a successor system; whether...

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
15330; 515 c1141W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether his Department has conducted a review of the UK's policy of maintaining Trident nuclear submarines on continuous at-sea deterrent patrol; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
15296; 515 c1141W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish studies (a) commissioned and (b) undertaken by his Department on the (i) financial costs and (ii) potential savings associated with an extension of the life of the Vanguard submarines beyond five years, in advance of the publication of...

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
15295; 515 c1140-1W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish studies (a) commissioned and (b) undertaken by his Department on the (i) financial cost and (ii) potential savings associated with the development of alternatives to the replacement of the Trident nuclear weapons system in advance of the publication...

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
15294; 515 c1140W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish studies undertaken by his Department on the potential savings associated with taking Trident submarines off continuous at-sea deterrent patrols, in advance of the publication of the value for money review of Trident; and if he will make a...

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
15297; 515 c1141W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what research and design work will need to be authorised in the assessment phase that will follow an initial gate decision to replace the Vanguard nuclear weapons capable submarines; which long lead items would be purchased during the assessment phase; what the...

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
9517; 514 c485W
House
House of Commons