Skip to main content

1-20 of 166 results for subject:"Criminal proceedings"

Member X
Earl of Onslow

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Onslow, Earl of (166)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, for my recent birthday, I was given by a very clever brother-in-law of mine a book by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Bingham. In it he talks about the rule of law and mentions the Court of Star Chamber, and what I think were called the prerogative...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1534-6
House
House of Lords

It was in fact a Home Office Minister who made that statement. That is why it is so bizarre that they were dangerous while locked up but not dangerous when they had absconded.

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1540
House
House of Lords

My Lords, apart from the fact that the four people who have put their names to this amendment could be described in modern terms as some of the most grown up in the House, I should like to draw a small point to your Lordships’ attention. As your Lordships know,...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2010
Reference
717 c488
House
House of Lords

There is an important distinction to be made between a perfectly dotty expenses system from which people can legally claim, albeit with a difference of morality, and doing things like—I am not quite sure if I am in order here—claiming interest on a mortgage that does not exist. Claiming interest...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1290
House
House of Lords

The MP is less dishonest.

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1294
House
House of Lords

When the noble Baroness was asked earlier, she said that an offence committed under the Fraud Act had to be shown to be clearly dishonest. I assume that the words "clearly dishonest" also apply to Clause 8. Is it right that you can be half-dishonest under Clause 8? How does...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2009
Reference
712 c1293-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2009
Reference
712 c695
House
House of Lords

My Lords, was there not a consensual agreement between Molotov and Ribbentrop in 1939?

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2009
Reference
712 c748
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend said that there was no urgency on certain financial matters. Under those circumstances, will he encourage his friends on the Front Bench to vote for my noble friend Lord Norton of Louth’s amendment—or is that asking too much?

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2009
Reference
712 c742
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have never been a Member of the House of Commons, but when I am either booted out of this House or I die, it will be the first time since 1550 that there has not been an Onslow in one or both Houses of Parliament continuously for...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2009
Reference
712 c730-1
House
House of Lords

Good, my Lords, she is. Well done. The noble Baroness has to get up and say, "I have listened to very distinguished gentleman from all sides of the House"—and ladies, because I am not being sexist. I do not want to be reported to Harriet Harman. She should get up...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2009
Reference
712 c731
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the Leader of the House were to get up now and say yes to three days or no to three days, that would ease the noble Lord’s dilemma, would it not? If she were to say no to three days, he would then have to become unimpaled...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2009
Reference
712 c737
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord is very critical of the Government, with which I agree 100,000 per cent, if my mathematics is not a bit ropey, but the same criticism applies to our own Front Bench for allowing this through on the nod. We should not have done that. We...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2009
Reference
712 c682
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very pleased that the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, reminded the House that no judge has refused a police application. On the JCHR, we heard evidence of quite short periods of interrogation and of very long periods of languishing in cells during the extended time. I suspect...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2008
Reference
705 c164
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am reminded of the biblical quotation, ““What the Lord giveth, he taketh away””. I fear that that is what the noble Lord, Lord West, has done. On the Joint Committee on Human Rights, we heard an awful lot about post-charge questioning. We went into it very carefully....

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2008
Reference
705 c174-5
House
House of Lords

If the man is responsible for running something, why should it be the responsibility of somebody else if a mistake has been made? Surely it is up to him as the responsible man.

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2008
Reference
701 c557GC
House
House of Lords

I heard the Minister say that the amendment would make responsible officers investigate every system failure. Can she tell me when responsible officers should not investigate system failures?

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 May 2008
Reference
701 c557GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Elystan-Morgan, has produced the most marvellous comment on the Bill. He said that he wishes that Clause 10 had not been put in the Bill. He half agrees with the Government’s amendment but says that Clause 10 should not be brought in anyway because...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2008
Reference
701 c573
House
House of Lords

My Lords, having spoken on this issue in Committee, I am moved, first, to thank the Government for listening to what other people have said, and that is always to be congratulated. It seems to me that what the noble Lord, Lord Bach, has just said may be 100 per...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2008
Reference
701 c249
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one cannot take away somebody’s right to do something and then not put in place binding arbitration. My noble friend Lady Hanham mentioned the disturbing sight of the police demonstrating. That sight terrified me because it brings the forces of law into political play. That is very dangerous....

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2008
Reference
701 c290
House
House of Lords