Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:"Data processing"

Member X
Lord Pannick

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Pannick, Lord (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The noble Lord, Lord Knight, said from the Government Benches that his Government have handled this issue badly. I think he used the word “appallingly”. That is indisputable. The question I have is, why? I suggest that the answer may have been stated by my noble friend Lord Russell of...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
846 c766
House
House of Lords

I am delighted to be associated with the noble Lord on this, as on many other topics.

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2025
Reference
846 c766
House
House of Lords

The skill and determination of the noble Baroness, Lady Owen, have persuaded the Government to address this important topic in the Bill. She has performed a great service to this House. I thank the Minister, most sincerely, and the Bill team for bringing forward their Amendment 2, and for the...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2025
Reference
843 cc708-710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my congratulations to the noble Baroness, Lady Owen, for her skill and persistence in persuading the Government to address this noxious practice, which is causing so many women so much distress and humiliation. It is outrageous that this is still not unlawful.

I very much welcome what...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2025
Reference
843 cc191-211
House
House of Lords

I just ask the Minister, before he sits down, whether he will address the point that the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, raised. The Minister said that he will address matters at Third Reading, but of course he can address matters only if an amendment is brought forward. Is he accepting,...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 January 2025
Reference
843 c216
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as one of the few counsel who has acted in privacy cases for both the Daily Mail and Mr Max Mosley. I cannot support the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Hollins. I remind your Lordships of what the Conservative Party...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2018
Reference
791 c441
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome Commons Amendment 188 on the confidentiality of legal advice. As the Minister knows, a concern has been raised, long after the 11th hour, about the position of arbitrators. The concern is that the Bill addresses the data protection obligations of judges and lawyers but does not...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2018
Reference
791 c486
House
House of Lords

Could I suggest to the noble Lord that they were too busy arbitrating?

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2018
Reference
791 c488
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Earl for mentioning one of the many cases over the years in press law that I have lost. I mention to noble Lords another of those cases, in the Court of Appeal in 2015, when I represented entirely unsuccessfully Mirror Group...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc223-5
House
House of Lords

I am not suggesting that breaches do not occur; I am not an apologist. My position is that if and when errors are made and wrongful acts occur, the law has ample means of dealing with them. We do not set up a massive public inquiry in areas of the...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c235
House
House of Lords