Skip to main content

1-6 of 6 results for subject:Injunctions

Member X
Lord Pannick

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Pannick, Lord (6)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I agree with everything said by the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey. As I understand the Government’s position, they accept that it would not be appropriate to impose such an order unless it is necessary and proportionate, and indeed that is the test applied by the European Convention on...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c613
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister accept that it is very difficult ever to think of circumstances in which it would be appropriate for a court to impose a respect order, with all the implications that has for an individual, unless the court is satisfied that it is necessary and proportionate?

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c621
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too have concerns about this amendment. Nobody could dispute that waste crime is a very serious problem that needs to be addressed.

But as I understand it, the NCA’s strategic priorities at the moment—whether they are required by the Secretary of State or otherwise—focus on degrading the...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
853 c646
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, said, the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998 was due in very substantial part to the ministerial and parliamentary skills of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine of Lairg. It was due also to the persistent advocacy of...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2011
Reference
727 c1501-3
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may ask the noble Lord about one matter. He said on a number of occasions that the object of this clause is to deal with unsupervised drinking. Would it not be better to state in Clause 30, if we need an offence at all, that no offence is...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2009
Reference
713 c127
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept that if Amendment 111A is not included, there is a real risk of uncertainty as to what takes priority—the duties of the police to prevent risks of disorder or the welfare of the child? That is why it is essential that something like Amendment 111A is...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2009
Reference
713 c137
House
House of Lords