Skip to main content

1-8 of 8 results for subject:"Consumer goods"

Member X
John Penrose

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Penrose, John (8)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

May I start where I left off when the Bill hit Second Reading by saying that it is extremely welcome and creates an enormous amount of important and much-needed change? I continue to support it in principle.

My purpose in rising today is to speak to new clause 31, which I...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 cc108-110
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right: I may have been guilty of being too glass half empty, rather than glass half full. The new clause goes a very long way and enfranchises large chunks of the economy that perhaps have not been dealt with properly up until now; I just wanted...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 c111
House
House of Commons

I do not know whether the hon. Lady heard my earlier remarks, but let me reassure her that new clause 31 would not reduce the CMA just to that; it would still have all its other powers. In fact, the total number of staff employed by the RPC to do...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 c122
House
House of Commons

I join the queue of people congratulating the Minister on his new role, which is well deserved. I think that I am right in saying that any appeal against a fine from another economic regulator, such as Ofwat or Ofgem, is made to the CMA on the basis of the...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 c53
House
House of Commons

The Minister is being very generous. I just want to understand why the approach differs from that taken in identical appeals by other companies against other economic regulators.

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2023
Reference
741 c53
House
House of Commons

I echo the points about the need for a careful balance between not interfering from this place, while also ensuring accountability. I believe—parliamentary historians will put me right if I am wrong—that about a decade ago there used to be a Regulatory Reform Committee in this place. It was rarely...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c901
House
House of Commons

Like my hon. Friend the Member for Folkestone and Hythe (Damian Collins), I was concerned that the Minister might be moving on from part 1 a fraction early. This is a welcome Bill that will do an enormous amount of good, and it has allowed me to tick off a...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c881
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his generosity in giving way again.

The Minister’s response to the question about regulatory burden mentioned the welcome, necessary and important review of economic regulators. However, he will understand that enormous regulatory burden is created by other regulators. There are only eight economic regulators, but there...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2023
Reference
732 c883
House
House of Commons