Skip to main content

1-20 of 952 results for subject:"Income tax"

Member X
Baroness Primarolo

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primarolo, Baroness (952)
More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the likely net effect on annual Treasury revenues of a four pence reduction in the basic rate of income tax.

Asked by
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2007
Reference
144566; 462 c384W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the revenue implications of a 1 per cent. change in the basic rate of income tax in each year from 2007-08 to 2010-11; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
459 c985-6W; 131840
House
House of Commons

(2) if he will estimate the revenue implications of increasing the personal tax free allowance to (a) £7,500, (b) £8,000, (c) £8,500, (d) £9,000, (e) £9,500 and (f) £10,000 in each year from 2007-08 to 2010-11; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
131842; 459 c986-7W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the reduction in revenue from raising the 40 per cent. tax rate threshold for income tax to £50,000 of taxable income in a full tax year.

Asked by
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
132814; 459 c987W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the impact of the removal of the 10 pence tax rate on the incomes of people aged (a) between 60 and 65 years and (b) 65 years and older.

Asked by
David Anderson (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
132170; 459 c986W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) if he will estimate the number of income tax payers who would be removed from taxation as a result of raising the income tax threshold to (a) £7,500, (b) £8,000, (c) £8,500, (d) £9,000, (e) £9,500 and (f) £10,000 in each year...

Asked by
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
459 c986-7W; 131841
House
House of Commons

On that point, the idea that there should be a Finance Bill every two years is not a new proposition. Will the hon. Lady explain how she would deal with the catastrophic loss—or potentially catastrophic loss—of revenue on account of avoidance if the House presided over a two-year Budget?

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
459 c689
House
House of Commons

The point I was making to the hon. Lady was that there is a difference between policy and technical amendment. She previously complained about anti-avoidance policy being too long, so will she explain how that matter could be dealt with just through Budget resolutions without discussion by the House?

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
459 c689
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
459 c742
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the hon. Gentleman could explain whether he agrees with the proposition that people who make losses but have nothing to offset them against should be able to sell those losses to others who have no losses but wish to buy them to offset against the tax that they should...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2007
Reference
459 c742
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the (a) number of cases of and (b) loss of revenue through income tax evasion by those resident in (i) the United Kingdom, (ii) each region and (iii) each London borough in each of the last five...

Asked by
Paul Burstow (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2007
Reference
132171; 459 c691-2W
House
House of Commons
Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Department
Treasury
Type
Government bills
Date
27 March 2007
Reference
Bill 86 2006-07
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the hon. Gentleman could give us just one point in that paper that demonstrates that people are discouraged from staying together as a couple by the tax system.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2007
Reference
458 c1031
House
House of Commons

I listened carefully to what the hon. Gentleman said. He implied that the way in which tax credits and the tax system are constructed discourages partners from staying together, but where is his proof?

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2007
Reference
458 c1030
House
House of Commons

I have read the whole thing, and I am waiting for the hon. Member for South-West Hertfordshire (Mr. Gauke) to give one point that proves his argument.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2007
Reference
458 c1031
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman expect his party’s environmental taxes to work? If they do, and people’s income goes down as a result, how will his party fund the income tax cut then?

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2007
Reference
458 c1022
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman looks at the take-up of working tax credit, he will find that it is higher than any of the predecessor benefits offered to that group. I agree that it is not as high as I would like it to be, but it is still considerably higher...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2007
Reference
458 c1021
House
House of Commons

I think that the hon. Gentleman will find that his point does not bear scrutiny. If he looks at the take-up of the child tax credit for families on incomes of £10,000 or less a year—we would all class them as low-income families—it is 97 per cent. That is hardly...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2007
Reference
458 c1021
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much income tax was paid in the last year for which figures are available by individuals whose income did not exceed their tax free allowance; and what percentage was claimed back.

Asked by
Ashok Kumar (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2007
Reference
128165; 458 c768W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much was paid in (a) income tax and (b) national insurance contributions by (i) men and (ii) women aged (A) under 25, (B) 25 to 29, (C) 30 to 34, (D) 35 to 39, (E) 40 to 44, (F) 45 to 49,...

Asked by
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2007
Reference
458 c279-80W; 126060
House
House of Commons