Skip to main content

1-20 of 31 results for subject:Separation

Member X
Baroness Primarolo

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Primarolo, Baroness (31)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The hon. Lady continues to demonstrate her lack of understanding of the complexity of the consultation with regard to definitions of disability, the range of organisations that took part in it, and my acknowledgement that some of those organisations—some of them—did not take the same view as us, and that...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c699-700
House
House of Commons

We dealt with fluctuating conditions in Committee, and I made it absolutely clear to the hon. Lady then what would happen in such circumstances. If she cannot remember that, I cannot help her, but I will send her the reference.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c699
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Lady will let me make this point, I will give way to her. I have already said that. That list includes organisations such as the Association of Directors of Social Services, the Royal College of Nursing, the Parents Autism Campaign for Education, the National Children’s Bureau, Children...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c698-9
House
House of Commons

No, I shall finish this point and then I will give way on the disability point. The Council for Disabled Children represents a long list of organisations, which I do not have time to read into the record because the House needs to move on.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c698
House
House of Commons

I will give way in a moment. Those that participated were Contact a Family, the Council for Disabled Children, the Disability Alliance, Mencap, the Thalidomide Trust, Barnardo’s, Scope, the Disability Rights Commissioner and the Family Fund.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c698
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is not fairly reflecting what happened in Committee. The Committee asked for examples, and I gave examples. Conservative Members do not like the examples that I gave, and consider them theoretical. Amazingly, that does not stop them advancing a theoretical case to attack the Bill. I gave...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c684
House
House of Commons

But does the hon. Lady agree with her hon. Friend the Member for Macclesfield (Sir Nicholas Winterton) that inheritance tax should be abolished—yes or no?

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c673
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Lady is not making any commitments at all, bearing in mind what her hon. Friend the Member for Macclesfield said about abolishing inheritance tax, will she give him an undertaking that she will consider the matter and inform him and the House in due course?

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c673
House
House of Commons

May I say how much I am looking forward to seeing the right hon. Gentleman’s next newsletter, in which he explains this issue to his constituents? If he believes what the hon. Member for Chipping Barnet (Mrs. Villiers) has said, but it turns out not to be true, he will...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c683
House
House of Commons

I have already heard that point from the hon. Member for Chipping Barnet (Mrs. Villiers), who was lobbied by the same people as the hon. Member for Falmouth and Camborne (Julia Goldsworthy). However, there is an alternative, because a charge could be taken on the property, so it is simply...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c680
House
House of Commons

I will put a proposition to the hon. Lady, and I would be grateful if she were to respond to it. The Government consulted two years ago with many organisations, which I shall list. Those organisations agreed with the definition that is currently being used. The hon. Lady has quoted...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c679
House
House of Commons

It would help me enormously if the hon. Lady would list the organisations that approached her. I would then be able to list those that agreed with the definition.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c679
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the hon. Lady would explain to the hon. Member for Macclesfield (Sir Nicholas Winterton) that the Government carried out a consultation exercise on this very issue two years ago and that, overwhelmingly, all the organisations consulted said that they want to stick with the provisions of the Mental Health...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c667
House
House of Commons

I just said that.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c667
House
House of Commons

There are not 60 Government amendments in this group, although I do not think that that was what the hon. Lady meant to say. Secondly, in every Finance Bill Ministers say in Committee that they will go away and look at something, and if they think that there is a...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c677
House
House of Commons

It might be sensible if I made a little progress. I will give way to the hon. Lady on substantive points, because she was generous in giving way to me when she made her long opening remarks––remarks which she has made several times now during the Bill’s passage. Schedule 20...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c692
House
House of Commons

No, the hon. Gentleman is not correct. He wriggles a lot. I fear that he has already made up his mind on which way he might vote, should there be a vote, regardless of what I say.

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c692
House
House of Commons

That is not worthy of the hon. Lady. She knows full well that we are dealing with the setting up of trusts and the tax advantages that some trusts had. She raised a number of other points, which I will turn to. She knows full well from her time in...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c693
House
House of Commons

It is not a matter of apologising for the action that the Government have taken. It is clear that there is a tax regime in place for discretionary trusts and the changes being made are intended to bring two remaining types of trust in line with that. As the consultation...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c693
House
House of Commons

I am not going to try to persuade or convince the hon. Member for South-West Hertfordshire (Mr. Gauke), because he has told me clearly in previous debates that he absolutely disagrees with the principles that I assert and prefers to side with the advisers who have provided support to the...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2006
Reference
448 c691-2
House
House of Commons