Skip to main content

1-20 of 46 results for subject:Dissolution

Member X
Lord Rennard

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Rennard, Lord (46)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the Bill gives more power to Boris Johnson and less to Parliament. It is therefore in my view a Bill that Parliament should oppose, and I remain surprised that it has so much support from the Labour Benches. When Labour left government in 2010, the Labour Party manifesto...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
816 cc1301-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the title of the proposed electoral integrity Bill is worthy of Newspeak from George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Big Brother wants to protect us from a virtually non-existent threat.

The offence of stealing someone’s vote at a polling station is extremely rare. It is possible to determine exactly how many...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2021
Reference
812 cc218-9
House
House of Lords

14: Clause 1, page 1, line 17, leave out ““earlier or”” Amendment 14 agreed. Amendments 15 to 18 not moved.

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c884
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is of course a very clever lawyer, so perhaps he could just explain to the House, for the purposes of clarification, how he considers supporting an amendment that says that each Parliament, after each general election, should meet to consider how long the Parliament should last, is...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c837
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendments 12, 14 and 16 in my name and those of my noble friends Lord Tyler and Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames. Amendments 12 and 14 reflect the position that I set out in Committee, when I made plain that I could not see...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c877-8
House
House of Lords

12: Clause 1, page 1, line 16, leave out ““earlier or”” Amendment 12 agreed. Amendment 13 not moved. Amendment 14 Moved by

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c884
House
House of Lords

The previous Labour Prime Minister of course went for five years. If this legislation is passed in its current form, would a future Labour Government amend it to change back the fixed term from five years to four years?

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c782
House
House of Lords

With great respect to the noble Baroness, I did not refer in my remarks to the events of last week in the referendum. I was simply making the point that so many people here argue for more pre-legislative scrutiny. I believe that there would be more pre-legislative scrutiny in a...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c796
House
House of Lords

In response to demand from the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly not to have a clash in 2015, the Government said that they would facilitate whatever was required to postpone the elections to the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly for a five-year, rather than a four-year, term. My...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c796
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I set out in Committee three reasons why I felt strongly that a fixed-term Parliament of five years was more appropriate than one of four years. I shall not repeat those arguments at length. However, since I made the first argument there has been even more discussion about...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c795-6
House
House of Lords

It is the position of my party that general elections in which people get what they vote for is the most fundamental democratic reform. I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Owen, that if those people who support other systems, such as first past the post, really had the courage...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c797
House
House of Lords

We are rather going off the subject of the Fixed-term Parliaments Bill. Briefly, I remind the noble Baroness that her party's manifesto promised a referendum on AV but no other subject. The Conservative Party promised as part of the coalition negotiations to have a referendum on AV but on no...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c797
House
House of Lords

Does not the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer of Thoroton, recall that it was actually in the autumn of 1978 that the then Prime Minister, Mr James Callaghan, offered significant inducements to the Ulster Unionists to stave off his defeat by creating extra seats within Northern Ireland at the...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1096
House
House of Lords

My Lords, briefly, I support the broad principle of extending the election timetable, largely for the reasons given by the noble Lord, Lord Kennedy of Southwark. In particular, I feel strongly that we have too short a timetable for elections, which denies many service voters the opportunity to vote because...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1226
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness, particularly for her latter point. In response to her first point, about how I should have known all this before 2005, I say very honestly that if all of us ignored all the evidence and all that we had learnt during the past six years,...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c500-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sure that noble Lords opposite will have an opportunity to explain their points. Perhaps I may briefly explain the third reason for my having decided that five years is better than four years. It is again a question of consistency. We agreed relatively recently and after...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c500
House
House of Lords

The first reason is one about which the noble Lord, Lord Wills, should know a great deal. I pay great tribute to him as a genuine constitutional reformer. He was responsible in the previous Parliament and in the previous Government for changing significantly some of the rules on party political...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c499-500
House
House of Lords

No, indeed. There are many things that require considerable scrutiny. But it seems to me that the actual principle of a fixed-term Parliament has been considered a number of times in a number of ways. I happen to think, for the reasons I am trying to advance, that five years...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c499
House
House of Lords

In this Bill, we do not necessarily know whether we will have five-year terms or not. If the noble and learned Lord has his way, we will have four-year terms, not five years.

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c499
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in 2005, together with my noble friend Lord Razzall, I was responsible for the Liberal Democrat general election campaign. The manifesto for that campaign contained a commitment to fixed-term Parliaments and specified terms of four years. Obviously I have changed my mind, and I should like to give...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c498
House
House of Lords