Skip to main content

1-20 of 145 results for subject:Roads

Member X
Lord Rosser

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Rosser, Lord (145)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I will be relatively brief, not least because all that I was going to say has largely been said already by the noble Baronesses, Lady McIntosh of Pickering and Lady Randerson. I start by thanking the Minister for her explanation of the content and purpose of this instrument,...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 January 2022
Reference
817 cc209-211GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton
Answering member
Lord Rosser
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
19 January 2022
Reference
817 cc204-213GC
House
House of Lords

We welcome the fact that the Government are committing to a call for evidence on road safety issues next year. Like other noble Lords, I should be interested to know how long this exercise is expected to take. Also, is it purely a DfT matter, or a cross-departmental matter—and, if...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2021
Reference
817 cc100-1
House
House of Lords

I well remember the debates that we had on this issue shortly after Scotland decided to reduce the drink-driving limit in 2014. My recollection was that the Government were in effect saying, “We want to wait and see what the outcome is in Scotland”, while others were saying, “Why wait...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2021
Reference
817 cc122-3
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage second day. Amendment 58 agreed to. Amendment 61 disagreed to on division (18 to 105). (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Baroness Williams of Trafford; Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Rosser
Department
Home Office; Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
13 December 2021
Reference
817 cc93-126
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I take this opportunity to say how nice it is to see the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, back in action again. As usual, he made some interesting and relevant comments, even though he often sought to say that they were not strictly relevant to the order. Indeed, some...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2021
Reference
816 cc386-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, most of my comments will be directed towards the (Amendment) (No.2) regulations and to the report of the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee, which homed in particular on that order.

Under these regulations, the obligation is removed for some car drivers towing a trailer to have to take the additional...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2021
Reference
815 cc490-3GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton
Answering member
Lord Rosser
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Notes
Debated with motion to consider the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2021.
Date
9 November 2021
Reference
815 cc483-496GC
House
House of Lords

Climate change is the major challenge of our time, and winning public support for the cause is critical. Blocking roads and antagonising people is not going to achieve that objective.

This week, the London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, has significantly extended London’s ultra-low emission zone. The Evening Standard yesterday said that it backed Sadiq Khan in

“taking steps to clean up our city’s toxic air and cut our carbon emissions in the process.”

Do the Government also back Sadiq Khan on this, regarding it too as an effective example of how the ballot box can prove to be an effective way for people to respond to the climate crisis?

Asked by
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 2021
Reference
815 c644
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are repeated reports of UK companies switching and looking to switch at least part of their operations to countries inside the EU in order to overcome additional regulations, customs checks and costs of transporting goods to the EU following our departure from it. Is this a development that the Government are encouraging and supporting, despite the potential adverse impact on jobs, economic activity—including the logistics industry—and tax revenue in the UK?

Asked by
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2021
Reference
809 c1895
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her concise explanation of the content and purpose of these regulations. I must say, I also found the Explanatory Memorandum heavy going.

These regulations ensure that the drivers’ hours and tachograph rules for commercial road transport, lorries and coaches in the trade and co-operation agreement are...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2021
Reference
809 cc178-9GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Sitting suspended.

Lead member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton
Answering member
Lord Rosser
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
26 January 2021
Reference
809 cc174-182GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton
Answering member
Lord Rosser
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Notes
Debated with motion to approve the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2020.
Date
26 November 2020
Reference
808 cc400-421
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the orders extend the sunset clauses of existing 2019 orders, as the Minister said, from the end of this year so that heavy commercial vehicles can continue to be regulated by traffic officers in Kent until the end of October next year. That is to keep Operation Brock,...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 November 2020
Reference
808 cc418-420
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton
Answering member
Lord Rosser
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
806 cc128-136
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Rosser
Answering member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
806 cc136-150
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her explanation of the content and purpose of this draft statutory instrument covering the transport of dangerous goods by road and rail, which in transferring an EU legislative function at the end of the transition period, as she said, also gives the Secretary...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
806 cc132-3
House
House of Lords

What has prompted me to ask for this debate is the July report on this SI from the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee. These regulations were laid under the made negative procedure on 30 June and came into force on 4 July 2020. The rush was apparently because the Department for...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
806 cc136-9
House
House of Lords

Like the Minister, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed to this all-too-brief take-note Motion debate and made it worth while. I thank the Minister for her responses to the many points and questions that have been raised.

E-scooters may well prove to have a valuable role to...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 September 2020
Reference
806 cc148-150
House
House of Lords

As part of the Planning for the Future consultation, the Government are considering the relationship between infrastructure, including roads, and the planning system. With the White Paper asserting that decisions to grant planning consent should no longer be taken on a case-by-case basis but be

“determined by clear rules for what can and cannot be done”,

can the Minister give an assurance that the outcome under these future rules for what can and cannot be done will not result in diminished consideration of the environmental impact of proposed roadbuilding, bearing in mind that the environmental impact of roadbuilding and development, including on adjacent sites of ecological, cultural or scientific significance, varies considerably from case to case?

Asked by
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2020
Reference
805 c532
House
House of Lords