Skip to main content

1-20 of 25 results for subject:Trident

Member X
Joan Ruddock

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Ruddock, Joan (25)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

May I apologise at the outset, Madam Deputy Speaker, for the fact that I have a long-standing constituency engagement and I will not be here for the wind-ups? However, I am confident that both Front Benchers will say only good things about me.

There is a well-known saying in the peace...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c106
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is citing countries that are of course the minority—the nuclear-armed states. They all have the same attitude as him: they all have cold war thinking. Many of them have reduced their nuclear arsenals, but they remain more dangerous today.

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c106
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman says we cannot know what will happen in the future, but we have a pretty good idea. The threats that were part of the cold war scenario are very different from those we face today.

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c106
House
House of Commons

As I go on in my speech, I hope to indicate that I am talking about today and tomorrow.

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c107
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Lady, but, interestingly, the Government do not, and I will address that point, too.

So what do the true believers say Trident renewal is for? Three threat scenarios are usually advanced: the re-emergence of a major nuclear threat, which is code for Russia; new states acquiring...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c107
House
House of Commons

All the hon. Gentleman is advocating, of course, is conventional war, which can kill hundreds of thousands of people, as we see in Iraq. He is not making an argument. We need to look at where the real threats are and where real security lies. I will argue that real...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c107
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend needs to go back and look at his geography. There are not 47 sovereign states in Europe which belong to NATO—

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c108
House
House of Commons

The NATO ones do, but if my hon. Friend listened, he would know that I referred to 47 sovereign states, and they are not all members of NATO by any means.

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c108
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very good point.

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c108
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a good point. Nuclear weapons have no utility. They cannot be used to advance any cause or secure any territory without the most devastating effects. The true believers present them as benign, silently gliding under the oceans or quietly snoozing in bunkers doing no harm, but...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 cc108-9
House
House of Commons

I will come on to suggest what the world community thinks about that. It is of course my opinion that we would be safer without nuclear weapons. If the hon. Gentleman were both to read the research on nuclear winters and the report of the accidents that have been recently...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c109
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that the hon. Gentleman does not make a coherent case. Chemical weapons have certainly been used in recent times—we do not know whether biological weapons have been used—which means that nuclear weapons did not act as a deterrent, so his argument is not sound.

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c110
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that the hon. Gentleman does not know his history. There have been hundreds of wars since that time and hundreds of thousands of people have died. Many of the wars were proxy wars between the superpowers, so his argument is completely invalid. If he argues that deterrence...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c110
House
House of Commons

I am just about to finish.

After the conference, the Austrian Government issued a pledge in which they promised

“to identify and pursue effective measures to fill the legal gap for the prohibition…of nuclear weapons”.

About 40 countries have already signified their support for progressing towards an international treaty that could ban all...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 cc110-1
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the one scenario in which there could be an instant attack, without the build-up and norms of international discussions or whatever, would be a terrorist nuclear attack, not state sponsored but by something like ISIS? In those circumstances, does he agree that our nuclear...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c123
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for New Forest East (Dr Lewis) on obtaining this debate. He knows that we have disagreed on this subject for decades and nothing has changed today.

One of the questions that is never adequately addressed in such debates is why people believe, as the hon. Gentleman...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
556 cc1106-7
House
House of Commons

No, I am sorry; I would be taking up the time of others. The hon. Gentleman and I have debated many times. We must ask what kind of world we want to live in, and how best we can contribute to achieving it. The threats that we face today and...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c362-3
House
House of Commons

Many right hon. and hon. Members tonight have acknowledged that the cold war is over, but the White Paper on the future of Trident is still rooted in cold war thinking. It makes no real analysis of the future role of the US-led and nuclear-armed NATO alliance of which we...

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
458 c361-2
House
House of Commons

May I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement? Given the importance that he attaches to an independent nuclear weapons system for the UK, would he advise the 23 non-nuclear NATO states to acquire similar independent nuclear weapons, and if not, why not?

Member
Joan Ruddock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2006
Reference
454 c34
House
House of Commons

That this House calls upon Her Majesty's Government to publish a range of options concerning the future of the UK's nuclear weapons, including adherence to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty by the non-replacement of Trident and full information of the costs of a new generation of nuclear weapons; and requests that...

Primary sponsor
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
14 July 2006
Reference
2575
House
House of Commons