Skip to main content

1-20 of 155 results for house:"House of Lords"

Member X
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
Subject X
Encouragement of terrorism

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Scotland of Asthal, Baroness (155)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Encouragement of terrorism (155)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Whether they have made any assessment of whether Abu Abdullah, whose real name is Attila Ahmet, should be prosecuted under laws concerning the glorification of terrorism.

Asked by
Lord Steinberg (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2006
Reference
685 c144WA; 7456
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Terrorism Act 2000 (proscribed organisations) (amendment). Lords debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
Answering member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1610-20
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the draft order laid before the House on 17 July be approved [34th Report from the Joint Committee and 42nd Report from the Merits Committee]. The noble Baroness said: My Lords, Section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 provides a power for the Home Secretary to...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1610-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have supported this order, in particular the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, who has given such trenchant support to the orders and the necessity for them. I hope that I will be able to provide comfort to other noble Lords, too. I can...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2006
Reference
684 c1618-20
House
House of Lords

Whether they regard celebrations of Irish republican violence during Easter 1916 as a glorification of terrorism.

Asked by
Lord Tebbit (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 May 2006
Reference
5714; 682 c40WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2006
Reference
680 c254
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall say straight away what considerable pleasure the noble Lord’s last sentence has given me, if no other Member of this House. I hope that I can be as telegraphic as he has been in dealing with some of the points raised. The noble Lord accurately understood the Government’s points and...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2006
Reference
680 c256-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will take the victory any way it comes. We have thoroughly explored this issue. I hear what the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, says, but I also listen carefully to what my noble friend Lady Blood says about the possible impact of these sorts of statements, and the reassurance they can...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2006
Reference
680 c257
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that I am paraphrasing my right honourable friend the Home Secretary correctly, but he has already indicated that he is open to further discussions on this matter. Noble Lords will know that we do business in this House by trying to talk to each other, sometimes quite trenchantly,...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2006
Reference
680 c258
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I move Motion A, will the House give me the indulgence to note that Lord Ackner is no longer in his place? Many noble Lords will know that the only reason that Lord Ackner is not in his place is that he died yesterday. Lord Ackner had been a Member of...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2006
Reference
680 c241
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons amendments be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2006
Reference
680 c241
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do not insist on its Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 31 and 34, and do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 34B and 34D in lieu. In moving the Motion I join with all of those who send their deepest sympathy and condolences to Lord Ackner’s family. I will say a...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2006
Reference
680 c244-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Motion A, that the House do not insist on its Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 15, 28, 31, 32 and 34 and do agree to Amendments Nos. 34A and 34B proposed by the Commons in lieu. I urge noble Lords to accept the decision of the other place when it decided not to agree with your Lordships’ amendment...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
679 c136-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is always going to be important in every single prosecution to look at where the public interest lies. That is part of the judgment that has been made. I say very clearly indeed that these provisions should not be applied discriminatorily. These provisions are not set up to...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
679 c161
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that we can say without fear of contradiction that we have had yet again a comprehensive discussion of glorification. I confess that I wished that we could perhaps have had a slightly different hue to the debate, but I am refreshed that no new ideas seem to have come forward....

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
679 c160-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is precisely why we have to work so hard on international co-operation. As I indicated in my initial remarks, what often happens is that people remove things from one site and post them on another. We have had to be fleet of foot in relation to paedophilic material...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
679 c173
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand the proper concerns of the noble Baroness and the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, but I really feel in this instance that they are not well founded. The Special Branch officers who have been entrusted with this work have already been doing it with the Internet industry in a challenging...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
679 c172-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do not insist on its Amendments Nos. 22, 23 and 29, to which the Commons have disagreed for their reasons 22A, 23A and 29A. In relation to Motion B, perhaps your Lordships could give me a moment as I know that I must be precise in the terminology that I use in...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
679 c166-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the point is that the legislation we are putting through the statute book will apply from now on. It is important for us to look at the context in which decisions are made, but it would be quite wrong to say that we should not take such opportunities...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
679 c162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do not insist on its Amendments Nos. 25, 26 and 27; and do agree to Amendments Nos. 27A, 27B, 27C, 27D and 27E proposed by the Commons in lieu. I hope your Lordships will not be tempted by Amendments C1 and C2 standing in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart. Indeed, I have great...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2006
Reference
679 c176-7
House
House of Lords