1-20 of 77 results for subject:Science
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.258 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Science
- We searched for
- subject_t:Science OR subject_t:"Pure science" OR subject_ses:92917
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the capacity of UK universities to meet increased demand for science and engineering degree programmes, and what steps they are taking to ensure that the availability of university places aligns with demand.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the capacity of UK universities to meet increased demand for science and engineering degree programmes, and what steps they are taking to ensure that the availability of university places aligns with demand.
Universities are autonomous institutions and are therefore responsible for curriculum development and capacity planning. It is primarily for individual institutions to assess and manage their capacity to meet student demand for specific programmes, including those in science and engineering.
The government recognises the critical importance of science and engineering degree programmes in driving the UK's innovation and economic growth. We have recently announced that for the 2025/26 financial year we will be investing £845 million via the Strategic Priorities Grant in high-cost subject funding, which supports universities to deliver courses in various priority subjects, including science and engineering.
Skills England is the new national body for skills and it will play a crucial role in identifying skills needs and meeting those to support economic growth. Skills England will work closely with the higher education sector to identify and address local, regional and national skills priorities, including the science and engineering provision that is strategically important for our country.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they will take to reduce the gender achievement gap in science and maths in secondary schools in England.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they will take to reduce the gender achievement gap in science and maths in secondary schools in England.
All children and young people should have the opportunity to succeed, no matter who they are or where they are from, which is why our mission is to break down barriers to opportunity.
High and rising standards are at the heart of this mission, delivered through excellent teaching and leadership, a high-quality curriculum and a system which removes the barriers to learning.
The department remains committed to ensuring all children and young people have a strong foundation in mathematics to thrive in the modern economy, regardless of gender.
The department has a number of initiatives in place aimed at helping schools to improve their curricula and to drive up mathematics attainment, such as the Maths Hub programme. This department-funded, school-led network aims to improve the teaching of mathematics for all pupils in publicly-funded schools. The Maths Hubs programme focusses on reducing attainment gaps, which may be associated with disadvantage, gender or other factors, by providing school-to-school support focussed on mathematics subject knowledge and pedagogy training for teachers.
The government is supporting schools to promote science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) related subjects and careers through programmes such as STEM ambassadors. Volunteers who are registered for this initiative actively engage with children and young people to spark their interest in STEM subjects and raise their awareness of the pathways into STEM careers through their personal experiences. Of these volunteers, 48% are women and 17% are from an ethnic minority background.
The department is a partner signatory to the Tomorrow’s Engineers Code pledging to work with the engineering community to improve the quality, targeting, inclusivity and reach of engineering inspiration activities. The Code is a framework for organisations working to increase the number and diversity of young people pursuing engineering careers.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to halve the budget for the National Centre for Computing Education and remove funding for face-to-face and regional science teacher continuing professional development in all subjects except physics; and what impact this would have on social mobility, science teacher retention and UK growth.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to halve the budget for the National Centre for Computing Education and remove funding for face-to-face and regional science teacher continuing professional development in all subjects except physics; and what impact this would have on social mobility, science teacher retention and UK growth.
Over the last few years, the department has invested in the National Centre for Computing Education (NCCE) to help improve the quality of computing education. The NCCE will continue to provide support to teachers of computing, ensuring they are equipped with the specialist knowledge they require to confidently teach the subject. The independent Curriculum and Assessment Review will consider how children will acquire the key digital skills needed for life and work. The department will look at how it can support teachers to adapt to any future curriculum changes.
The Science Learning Partnerships have made important contributions over the last few years, and the department greatly values the work they have done. However, the previous government decided to focus resources more tightly, resulting in ending the funding of Science Learning Partnerships. The department expects to continue support for those teaching physics outside of their specialism. There is a range of other support for science education in schools, including materials from Oak National Academy in all three sciences, and free and commercially available continued professional development. The department remains strongly committed to supporting science education and continues to support teachers, including through generous financial incentives and fully funded Subject Knowledge Enhancement training.
To ask His Majesty's Government which scientific criteria they apply in deciding whether an educational institution can describe itself as a Health Sciences University; whether these criteria could apply to an institution teaching homeopathy and other alternative therapies; and which peer-reviewed research or externally-assessed teaching the Office for Students relied...
To ask His Majesty's Government which scientific criteria they apply in deciding whether an educational institution can describe itself as a Health Sciences University; whether these criteria could apply to an institution teaching homeopathy and other alternative therapies; and which peer-reviewed research or externally-assessed teaching the Office for Students relied...
When a provider requests to change its name, a strict criteria and assessment process is followed. The provider will already have undergone considerable scrutiny when being awarded Degree Awarding Powers (DAPs), including input from quality experts, drawn from the sector, to test the provider against multiple criteria. Indefinite DAP’s status is the main eligibility test for providers to be able to go through the title process.
In this instance, the provider gained degree awarding powers in 2016 and so was able to apply for university title as per the rules set out in the Office for Students’ (OfS) ‘Regulatory advice 13: how to apply for university college and university title’, which is attached and also available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/regulatory-advice-13-how-to-apply-for-university-college-and-university-title/#:~:text=and%20university%20title-,Regulatory%20advice%2013%3A%20How%20to%20apply%20for%20university%20college%20and,as%20part%20of%20their%20name.
The department and the OfS were notified in September 2023 regarding the provider changing its name. When considering the proposed new name for a provider, the OfS must have due regard to the need to avoid names that are, or may be, confusing. In addition, in the instance of the newly named Health Sciences University, the OfS operated an open consultation on the proposed name. This ran from 22 February 2024 to 21 March 2024, and determined the regulator's final decision. The OfS approach is set out in their case report ‘Approval of proposed new name for AECC University College - Office for Students’, which is attached and can also be found at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/approval-of-proposed-new-name-for-aecc-university-college/.
In addition to the OfS process, regulations brought into force under the Companies Act 2006 means that the department has responsibility for confirming that it has no objection to the use of the sensitive word ‘university’ in a business name. The OfS published approval of the proposed new name from ‘AECC University College' to 'Health Sciences University’ in July 2024. The department then considered the request from the provider to change its name to ‘Health Sciences University’ and was satisfied that the use of the word ‘university’ was appropriate in this context. The department had no objection to the use of the term ‘university’ in the proposed business name ‘Health Sciences University’ and issued the provider with a non-objection letter on 18 July 2024.
During this consultation the OfS did not receive any responses questioning the merit of the subject area(s) of the provider.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 27 February 2006 to Question 53160, on science GCSEs, what proportion of the timetable (a) biology, (b) chemistry and (c) physics are expected to take up when taught as separate subjects rather than as part...
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 27 February 2006 to Question 53160, on science GCSEs, what proportion of the timetable (a) biology, (b) chemistry and (c) physics are expected to take up when taught as separate subjects rather than as part...
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) what guidance her Department issues to encourage more girls to undertake A Level science subjects;
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) what guidance her Department issues to encourage more girls to undertake A Level science subjects;
| Candidates attempting GCE A level Physics (34) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of candidates | As a percentage of all GCE A level candidates | |
| Male | ||
| 2001/02 | 21,541 | 20.5 |
| 2002/03 | 20,369 | 17.2 |
| 2003/04 | 19,223 | 17.2 |
| 2004/05 | 18,920 | 16.7 |
| Female | ||
| 2001/02 | 6,319 | 5.2 |
| 2002/03 | 5,908 | 4.7 |
| 2003/04 | 5,383 | 4.2 |
| 2004/05 | 5,174 | 3.9 |
| (34) Ages are taken at the start of the academic year i.e. 31 August. |
(2) how many (a) girls and (b) boys undertook A Level physics in each of the last four years; what assessment she has made of the reasons for the difference in take up of such courses between boys and girls; and if she will make a statement.
(2) how many (a) girls and (b) boys undertook A Level physics in each of the last four years; what assessment she has made of the reasons for the difference in take up of such courses between boys and girls; and if she will make a statement.
| Candidates attempting GCE A level Physics (34) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of candidates | As a percentage of all GCE A level candidates | |
| Male | ||
| 2001/02 | 21,541 | 20.5 |
| 2002/03 | 20,369 | 17.2 |
| 2003/04 | 19,223 | 17.2 |
| 2004/05 | 18,920 | 16.7 |
| Female | ||
| 2001/02 | 6,319 | 5.2 |
| 2002/03 | 5,908 | 4.7 |
| 2003/04 | 5,383 | 4.2 |
| 2004/05 | 5,174 | 3.9 |
| (34) Ages are taken at the start of the academic year i.e. 31 August. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of the timetable (a) the double award science GCSE and (b) the new science GCSE and additional science GCSE are expected to take up.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of the timetable (a) the double award science GCSE and (b) the new science GCSE and additional science GCSE are expected to take up.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what her policy is on the teaching of creationism as a subject in schools; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what her policy is on the teaching of creationism as a subject in schools; and if she will make a statement.
(2) what percentage of pupils in (a) specialist colleges and (b) schools which are not specialist science colleges took (i) separate science and (ii) dual award science in the last period for which figures are available;
(2) what percentage of pupils in (a) specialist colleges and (b) schools which are not specialist science colleges took (i) separate science and (ii) dual award science in the last period for which figures are available;
| Table 2: Pupils studying in (a) specialist colleges and (b) specialist colleges which are not specialist science colleges being entered for GCSE qualifications in dual award science and separate sciences in 2005 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Percentage | ||
| 2005 (15-year-olds) | Specialist colleges | Non-science specialist colleges |
| Biology | 6.4 | 5.7 |
| Chemistry | 6.1 | 5.4 |
| Physics | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Dual Award Science | 75.0 | 74.5 |
| (49) Age at the start of the academic year, i.e. 31 August. |
| Table 3: Pupils studying in specialist colleges and schools which are not specialist science colleges and schools being entered for and achieving GCSE qualifications in dual award science and separate sciences by grade | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage | |||||||||
| Results of 15-year-olds | GCSE grade | ||||||||
| A* | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | Total | |
| 2005 | |||||||||
| Biology | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 5.7 |
| Chemistry | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 |
| Physics | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 |
| Dual Award Science | 3.1 | 6.4 | 10.5 | 22.0 | 14.9 | 9.2 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 74.5 |
| 2004 | |||||||||
| Biology | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.6 |
| Chemistry | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 |
| Physics | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 |
| Dual Award Science | 3.0 | 6.5 | 10.6 | 23.4 | 15.8 | 10.7 | 5.9 | 2.4 | 80.0 |
| 2003 | |||||||||
| Biology | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 6.2 |
| Chemistry | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.7 |
| Physics | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.7 |
| Dual Award Science | 2.9 | 6.6 | 10.6 | 23.8 | 16.5 | 10.9 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 81.8 |
| 2002 | |||||||||
| Biology | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.4 |
| Chemistry | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.3 |
| Physics | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.3 |
| Dual Award Science | 3.1 | 6.3 | 10.3 | 23.4 | 17.6 | 11.6 | 6.0 | 2.2 | 82.0 |
| (50) Age at the start of the academic year, i.e. 31 August. | |||||||||
| (51) Total proportion of 15-year-old pupils entered for qualification, including those who achieved a ‘U' grade, were absent or the result is pending. |