Skip to main content

1-20 of 111 results for subject:Banks

Member X
Owen Smith

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Smith, Owen (111)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the Summer Budget 2015, what estimate of the level of profits to be generated by UK banks was used to estimate the reserves to be derived from the corporation tax surcharge on banks.

Asked by
Owen Smith (Labour)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2015
Reference
6886
House
House of Commons

At the risk of stepping off-piste again and incurring your wrath, Sir Roger, all I would say is that that is another example of this Government's incompetence. A year ago they were trying to squeeze the oil and gas companies by introducing new taxes on them. Then the Government were...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c394
House
House of Commons

One needs to consider these things in the round. We have heard repeatedly from the Government that they will take more money from the rich than the previous Government and do more on tax avoidance, but none of those claims stands up to scrutiny. The previous eight Labour Budgets did...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c390-1
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. The key correlation is not between top rates of tax and GDP. There is very little evidence of that. However, there is evidence that top rates of tax have a massive impact on the distribution of wealth across the deciles, and are concentrated on the richest percentage of our...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c338
House
House of Commons

What I would accept is that the rate was raised to 50p in the end because we felt that there was still an overriding imperative to help through the period of recession the people in our economy who are the most vulnerable and to ask those who are the most...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c335-6
House
House of Commons

I grateful for that intervention. I am not sure whether the pork pie was served at ambient temperature, but it was certainly a pork pie.

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c334
House
House of Commons

When the IMF first talked about a bank levy, it thought that an equitable, sensible amount to get from the banks in this country was £6 billion—not the £2.5 billion that the Government claim to be raising. The reality—people out there ought to understand this—is that by the end of...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c387
House
House of Commons

I will explain to the hon. Gentleman why there is a step from year 1, when we anticipated it would raise £1.3 billion but when it actually raised £1.1 billion, to the subsequent figure of £3 billion. The explanation, of course, is that it gets far harder to bring money...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c368
House
House of Commons

No. We think that would generate significant revenues, which could be used to create youth jobs to tackle the scourge of youth unemployment in our country and to create new affordable homes. We want the Government to look at that; we want them to get their priorities right; we want...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c396
House
House of Commons

I am grateful, Sir Roger. I am bringing my remarks to a conclusion. The amendment we have tabled is very simple. It simply requires the Government to look at the possibility of reintroducing a payroll tax on the banks.

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c396
House
House of Commons

With the greatest respect, either the right hon. Gentleman misunderstood what I said or he is deliberately misrepresenting what I said—mischievously, I suggest. We were not intending to do anything other than replicate that which we have done previously, so a bonus tax is what we were talking about. The...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c401
House
House of Commons

I hate to say it, but it is worse than that. What happened is that the Chancellor made up his mind, and then made the evidence fit his decision. [Interruption.] I am asked where is the evidence, but 32 times in the one exculpatory piece of evidence provided, the Treasury...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c336
House
House of Commons

Yes, for the last time.

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c336
House
House of Commons

I do not know how many times I need to keep telling the hon. Gentleman this, but the simple answer is no. He should turn to page 2 of the document, which clearly says that this rate raised £1 billion; he should turn to page 39, which says that it...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c336
House
House of Commons

I am thrilled to have given way to the Minister, because his intervention has revealed that, although he may have read the dodgy dossier, he has not read the academic literature. If he had done so, he would have read more recent publications such as that of Saez, Slemrod and...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c338
House
House of Commons

When we get close enough to the next election to write our manifesto, we will write it, and the hon. Lady will be able to see it then. That is the simple answer to her question. Can she tell us exactly what will be in her party's manifesto at this...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c336-7
House
House of Commons

Again, I am pleased that I gave way, as I think that is an excellent suggestion, which we really should take up. Of course the series of interventions on the 50p rate from the current Mayor of London—I say current; I hope he will not be Mayor for much longer—and,...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c334-5
House
House of Commons

I have already pointed out three times that it was a pork pie, including to the hon. Member for Rochester and Strood (Mark Reckless), to whom I do not intend to give way. I will give way, however, to my right hon. Friend.

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c334
House
House of Commons

I shall give way to a Welsh colleague.

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c334
House
House of Commons

The 50p rate was introduced, as I said earlier, when we were in the depths of the biggest global recession—[Interruption.] I add the word global, unless Government Members are still suggesting that the collapse of Lehman Brothers in the US was the fault of the Labour Government. Among the many...

Member
Owen Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2012
Reference
543 c334
House
House of Commons