Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for subject:Fracking

Member X
Graham Stringer

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Stringer, Graham (15)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Within the Government, there are many different estimates of the impact on jobs and the cost to the Treasury. Why do we not have an impact assessment for this statutory instrument? That would be good regulatory and legislative practice.

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2019
Reference
662 c509
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Thirsk and Malton (Kevin Hollinrake) on an extremely well balanced speech. All discussion about the energy industry is fraught, because it tends to deal not only with the detail, but with people’s particular ideological positions.

In the time available, I will make two major points....

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 June 2015
Reference
597 cc383-5WH
House
House of Commons

I am following the right hon. Gentleman’s argument about jobs. Does he accept that as well as being an energy source, fracked gas is a feedstock for our chemical industry, which is currently vulnerable to the United States chemical industry because of the high costs of energy in this country...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2014
Reference
588 c198WH
House
House of Commons

I will be brief, Mr Gray, because the hon. Member for Warrington South (David Mowat) said most of what I wanted to say.

I agree with the hon. Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood (Eric Ollerenshaw) that it is vital that local communities, however defined, benefit from fracking. It would have been...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2014
Reference
588 c211WH
House
House of Commons

It is very interesting in the context of fracking, Mr Gray.

We need to consider whether we can benefit from shale gas in a sensible and rational way. As hon. Members have said, prices will not necessarily decrease, owing to how the European market works. We will put our gas into...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2014
Reference
588 c212WH
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
566 c323WH
House
House of Commons

Outside London and the south-east, the highest house prices in the country are in Aberdeen, due to the benefit of the oil industry in the North sea. Eventually, the improvements in the economy if shale gas is exploited are likely to lead to a rebalancing of the UK economy and...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
566 c323WH
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman accept that not only would that gas be expensive because it is being imported, but the price would be artificially forced up, because under the Government’s scenario it is being kept for back-up supplies and is therefore used inefficiently? Although the hon. Gentleman is right to...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
566 c335WH
House
House of Commons

I had not noticed that the air conditioning had changed.

I congratulate the hon. Member for Brighton, Pavilion (Caroline Lucas), whom I tend to either agree or disagree with 100%. Today I am afraid it is the second of those two positions.

There have been many excellent speeches on both sides, and...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
566 c338WH
House
House of Commons

That is completely consistent with what I was saying—that the fear of the activity, rather than the activity itself, is the problem.

I want now to move on to the science and to speak as a scientist. I agree with virtually everything the right hon. Member for Hitchin and Harpenden (Mr...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
566 cc338-9WH
House
House of Commons

It would not be if it was just a hedge and it was not artificially pushing the cost of gas and other energy supplies up by holding them in reserve. The hon. Gentleman is right: it is a hedge, but it is a very expensive hedge indeed.

There are two reasons...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
566 cc339-340WH
House
House of Commons

One of the points that has not been made is that there is a slight assumption that shale gas is just methane. It is actually ethane and propane as well, and those can be used as feedstock to our chemical industry, lowering chemical prices and making the industry more competitive.

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
566 c341WH
House
House of Commons

There is an interesting historical point behind the name of this debate: what is Lancashire?

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c207WH
House
House of Commons

For the purposes of this debate, I think Salford can be Lancashire and that there will be immediate benefits there.

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that apart from immediate local benefits, there will be general benefits for the whole country if the exploitation of shale gas is successful because the real...

Member
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2013
Reference
566 c207WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change on which date he and his Ministers and officials received the report from the British Geological Survey on the extent of shale gas reserves in the UK.

[164196]

Asked by
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 July 2013
Reference
164196; 566 c324W
House
House of Commons