Skip to main content

1-20 of 52 results for subject:Testing

Member X
Gerry Sutcliffe

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Sutcliffe, Gerry (52)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will introduce (a) mandatory daily drug testing and (b) random drug testing for those defendants subject to a drug rehabilitation requirement under the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

Asked by
Humfrey Malins (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2007
Reference
130345; 459 c452W
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c972
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is just plain wrong. He said that the existing system has its weaknesses and needs to be supported. I am saying that the change in culture that we want is for cutting reoffending rates and helping offenders to be the responsibility of the whole community. Throughout our...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c973
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c973
House
House of Commons

I apologise, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Does my hon. Friend support a partnership between Rainer and Serco to provide services?

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c967
House
House of Commons

I take the point that the hon. Gentleman makes, but it is important that we look at the context. Mention has been made of the charities that are involved, such as Barnardo’s and the NSPCC. I have been heartened by the work of Circles of Support, which is a body...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c943
House
House of Commons

I thank the contributors to this debate, which is on an important subject that we spent some time discussing in Committee. I am grateful for the contributions by the hon. Member for Hornchurch (James Brokenshire), my hon. Friend the Member for Walthamstow (Mr. Gerrard) and the hon. Members for Somerton...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c942-3
House
House of Commons

I do—if that were the only condition or the only requirement. The hon. Gentleman touches on a point that we will come to: offenders who come out of prison are sometimes homeless and do not have an address. There is a requirement for the authorities to know where the people...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c944-5
House
House of Commons

That leads me on to the issue that the hon. Member for Hornchurch raised about what we are doing to stop people giving addresses such as ““in the woods””. Although I have some concerns about ““in the woods”” being an address, the reason why that was done was that offenders...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c944
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. and learned Gentleman explain why the Local Government Association, which has Conservative members, now supports the Bill’s principles of local accountability?

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c949
House
House of Commons

I hope that that will be possible. The hon. Gentleman knows that there is a qualification about such matters due to timing, but I see no reason why that should not be the case, given the close relationship. We all want the system to operate properly. My hon. Friend the...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c945
House
House of Commons

This important group of amendments flows from our proceedings in Committee. Protecting the public from the problem of sexual abuse is a matter to which the Government have given the highest priority. Over the years, we have introduced a range of measures designed to protect children and the vulnerable. We...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c934-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c933
House
House of Commons

I shall make progress, as I am mindful of the time. I want to explain why we disagree with my hon. Friend the Member for Walthamstow, whose commitment to the probation service I recognise. However, his amendment goes too far. His definition of core services is so wide that it...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c962-3
House
House of Commons

The simple answer is no. If that work is being carried out successfully by that probation board, it will continue. Nothing that we propose in the Bill will destroy those links. One would expect them to be strengthened by local area agreements and by the involvement of local partners. They...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c962
House
House of Commons

I anticipate my hon. Friend asking me to give way. I will give way and then get back to the main body of my speech. I want to hear what others have to say.

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c962
House
House of Commons

That is a response to the requests for us to listen to definitions of core probation functions. There is no intention to jeopardise public protection. We believe that through the measures we can proceed very cautiously and deliberately, with the support of local areas through local area agreements and all...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c964
House
House of Commons

The Bill is necessary to change the existing culture. It is important that we tackle reoffending. We all agree that reoffending rates, on whichever figures we believe, are too high, despite the excellent work of the probation service. The probation boards currently have a monopoly on the services that are...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c962
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend, who chairs the Home Affairs Committee, for the work that he does on these matters. The point that he raises about small individualised local voluntary sector schemes is important. I referred to that in Committee. We want to protect such schemes and...

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c961
House
House of Commons

That point goes to the heart of what the Government are trying to achieve. My hon. Friend will be aware of some of the partnerships at the moment, and particularly of the one involving Rainer and Serco. Would he support their involvement in a partnership to provide services?

Member
Gerry Sutcliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
457 c967
House
House of Commons