Skip to main content

1-20 of 321 results for subject:"Fees and charges"

Member X
Lord Thomas of Gresford

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Thomas of Gresford, Lord (321)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, in her very clear and lengthy exposition of the position. I applaud her efforts and seek to follow in her footsteps.

In his Written Statement on 18 November, the Under-Secretary of State for Justice, James Cartlidge, said:

“While...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2022
Reference
817 cc1254-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Morris of Aberavon, for his support, and I congratulate him on the attempts that he has made over a long time to civilianise military law. I am pleased that he mentioned Lord Elwyn-Jones, who admitted me to...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2021
Reference
816 cc744-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Thomas of Gresford

2: Clause 7, page 4, line 27, at end insert—

“(4A) Guidance under subsection (3)(a) must provide that where offences of murder, manslaughter, domestic violence, child abuse, rape or sexual assault with penetration are alleged to have been committed in the United Kingdom, any charges brought against...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2021
Reference
816 c752
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for her careful reply, but I feel that I must test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2021
Reference
816 c752
House
House of Lords

There is no doubt that serious crimes are more difficult to investigate in the military than in civilian life due to the exigencies of service. On the other hand, serious crimes occur less often than they do in the territory of every civilian police force. That is why Sir Robert...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2021
Reference
816 cc788-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the sort of instrument to slip under the radar at the end of a Session. The proposal is to increase the fees for bringing money and possession claims, for the benefit of the Treasury.

It was a benefit to individuals, and to businesses both small and large,...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2021
Reference
811 cc241-2GC
House
House of Lords

In the Attorney-General’s review, published in November 2018, there was a section on disclosure pre-charge. Chapter 5 stated:

“The evidence given by almost all stakeholders to the Review is that early and meaningful engagement between the prosecution team and the defence is crucial to improve the disclosure process.”

It went on:

“This is...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2020
Reference
806 cc1679-1681
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the order. I declare an interest in that a close family member is a judge in the First-tier Tribunal—but not, I believe, in the General Regulatory Chamber.

I have been a strong supporter of CILEx from its inception. Indeed, I addressed some of its early conferences due...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2020
Reference
802 c405GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will continue with the issue of community and talk about my community, Gresford, where I live. Many years ago, I was involved in a judicial review. There was an application for opencast mining at Gresford colliery. Members may recall that that was the scene of a terrible...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2017
Reference
783 cc2509-2510
House
House of Lords

The regulations as drafted suggest that there can be alteration depending upon the court’s view of the merits or demerits of the case as it goes along. Am I wrong in that?

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2017
Reference
783 c2520
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I regret that the balance and good humour shown by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Saville of Newdigate, in his excellent maiden speech was not available to us during the testing times when we were discussing the legality of the war in Iraq and all the legislation...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2016
Reference
774 cc407-410
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the noble and learned Lord, Lord Morris of Aberavon, for introducing this debate. My interests are declared. I started off as a salaried partner in a small country solicitors’ office in north Wales in 1961 on a salary of £1,000 a year. Despite our limitations,...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2015
Reference
758 cc252-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a privilege to follow the noble Lord and the comments that were made in particular by the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Scotland. Referring back to my own beginnings, I was one of those who, having left university, was not in a position to go to...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2013
Reference
750 cc886-8
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Lord explain what this amendment therefore adds to the provisions in the Bill? That is what puzzles me.

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1562
House
House of Lords

But is not the effect of putting this at the beginning of the Bill precisely what the Minister said—that is, it leaves it open to lawyers to bring applications for judicial review and to ask judges to determine whether the financial situation has so improved that the provisions for legal...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1562
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very pleased to welcome the government amendment in lieu, which follows very closely the amendments that the Liberal Democrats put down, both in Committee and on Report, for ensuring that there is proper legal support for appeals on a point of law to the Upper Tribunal,...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1638-9
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister not support my argument that it is better that there should be no success fees at all, rather than that success fees should be claimed against the insurers, which is what this amendment amounts to—in other words, a continuation of the current system? Does the Minister not...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1618
House
House of Lords

Why should one run that risk? Why should one have applications for judicial review being made based on the amendment as currently drafted? This adds nothing to the Bill. All it does is open an avenue for satellite litigation which should not be permitted.

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1566
House
House of Lords

Before using a word such as that, does the noble Lord not agree that there is a constitutional convention that—

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1568
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1567
House
House of Lords