Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for subject:"Ministerial powers"

Member X
Lord Tunnicliffe
Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Tunnicliffe, Lord (22)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I cannot say that there is a specific decision on that at the moment, although I think that it is probable. Apparently, by magic means, I am authorised to say yes. Foreign public officials are defined in subsection (5) to include individuals who hold legislative and administrative posts of any...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c127-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the two amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Henley, seek to introduce an additional and, in our view, damaging qualification into the Clause 6 offence designed to deal with the particularly difficult and pressing problem of bribery of foreign public officials, especially those in developing nations, for...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c125-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we were pressed on the issue of a draft of a draft. Given the general support for the amendment, perhaps I do not need to detain the House by talking about it but, since I have been half-invited to do so, I shall. It is our intention that...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c145-7
House
House of Lords

10: Clause 7, page 5, line 16, at end insert "and see section (Guidance about commercial organisations preventing bribery) for a duty on the Secretary of State to publish guidance"

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c143
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords who have spoken. It is clear from the Bill, and it will be clear from my speech, that we have set our face against the concept of negligence and that we are talking about an offence of strict liability with a defence. I shall...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c141-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments concern Clause 7, which introduces a new offence of failure of a commercial organisation to prevent bribery. A commercial organisation will be guilty of the offence if a person associated with the organisation bribes another person intending to obtain or retain business or an advantage in...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c143-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, earlier in one’s life one says: "Unaccustomed as I am to public speaking". On this matter, I have to say: unaccustomed as I am to speaking on behalf of the Government, with so much support from the Back Benches, I feel that many of the points on the...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c134-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will come briefly to where we are at the moment. We believe that any advice that could be offered would be of questionable utility. In these circumstances such a service is unlikely to be attractive to those it is designed to benefit. I think I am effectively...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c151
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the noble Lords, Lord Goodhart, Lord Williamson, Lord Borrie and Lord Henley, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, and the noble Earl, Lord Onslow, for not thanking them for their contributions in the previous debate. It was the pressure that we received from those...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c150
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would not dream of gainsaying the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, in his recollection of the report. Nevertheless, we believe that the Joint Committee took that view. We are certainly clear that we are of that view. Moreover, it is difficult to see how much comfort such an...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2010
Reference
717 c150-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 17 brings us back to the issue of adequate procedures for the purpose of Clause 7. The noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, has proposed that an advisory service be established that would enable companies to seek advice on the adequacy of their procedures for the purpose...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c63-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are coming to an area where we do not share common ground. We do not believe that there should be a reference in the Bill. We will of course reflect on everything that has been said in Committee and the force with which it was said. As...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c55GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am afraid that we have not given that assurance, much as it might satisfy people. We will produce a revised statement of the things that will be going into that statutory guidance. We are not saying that we cannot do it by then, but we are not...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c56GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have made the point that if it is that simple, it is exactly the same as the assurance we have given and it is not necessary. That is the view we take on the guidance. We do not see the value of putting it on the face...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c53-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have received guidance from the noble Lord, Lord Henley, on probing amendments and not responding to them too literally. However, I think that the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, did invite me to respond to it literally. I understand that the noble Lord, Lord Henley, does...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c51-2GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl touches on the difference between our two approaches. We are not proposing to put the requirement for this guidance in the Act. Therefore, there is no legal basis on which a statutory instrument would come before Parliament. If it were part of the Act, we would obviously...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c54GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 9, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Henley, seeks to address circumstances in which a bribe was paid by a contractor or a fellow member of a consortium and the bribe payer is not under the control of the defendant. It would allow a defence to the...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c58-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall do my best. These amendments relate to the definition of a relevant commercial organisation for the purposes of the Clause 7 offence of the failure of commercial organisations. Clause 7(5) states that a relevant commercial organisation means a body which is incorporated under the law of...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c60-1GC
House
House of Lords

The fact that it was overturned on appeal reinforces the assurance that I am giving in the sense that we are satisfied that the courts will take into account all relevant information to ensure that the powers of confiscation operate in a reasonable and proportionate manner. It is a matter...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c53GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my understanding is that the Bill does not at any point define undue hospitality, but the very fact that I have read into the record the evidence from Professor Horder and the Law Commission about how that should be considered meets the idea without using the word "undue"....

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2010
Reference
716 c43-4GC
House
House of Lords