Skip to main content

1-20 of 88 results for subject:"Ministerial powers"

Member X
Lord Tunnicliffe

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Tunnicliffe, Lord (88)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I will speak to my Amendment 39. We had a very interesting conversation about this issue in Committee, but I will repeat it a little bit. Essentially, aviation is dangerous. There is a phrase that people in flying training always come across, that if God had meant men—and...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
858 cc482-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have Amendment 78 in this group. I shall only say a few words, and I suppose the very few words I could say are that, if we are to get new powers that may affect pilots, we wish to be consulted. In many ways, it is as...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
857 c165GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendments 60 to 62; I express a specific concern in my Amendment 62. I thought that I knew about the technology in this debate until I decided to brush up on it yesterday; I have spent most of my working hours since then getting...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
857 cc120-1GC
House
House of Lords

I will go next because of the generality of the subject. I find myself in the peculiar position of agreeing with people for once. I, broadly speaking, share the general direction of the noble Lord, Lord Barber, the specific objection of the noble Lord, Lord Davies—I remember well the joys...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
857 cc110-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, for 14 years, I was the most junior opposition Treasury spokesman. A slight problem with that is I was occasionally—in fact, more than occasionally—the most senior opposition Treasury spokesman, largely because there was only one of me. Settling into being a Back-Bencher, I glanced at what was coming...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2026
Reference
856 cc1204-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have been a Back-Bencher for two years, and in that period I have rather assumed that I bored enough people during the previous 14 years, so I have not been making too many speeches. I have a Select Committee and I do my duty there, and most...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2026
Reference
856 cc811-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to totally support the Government and to congratulate them on their draft Bill. I think the actions of the Government

have changed the tone of the debate. The role of government is being redefined. There is an acceptance that government is in the business of involvement...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 April 2025
Reference
845 cc499-500
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage. Amendments 1, 3 and 4 agreed to. Bill, as amended, ordered to be printed (HL Bill 43).

Lead member
Lord Davies of Gower
Answering member
Lord Liddle; Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1149-1162
House
House of Lords

I apologise for jumping in on this point but it is very important. The Minister said that the generation of regulations would be solely the responsibility of Transport for London, which is exactly where we seek to be. In preparing for this debate I looked through the Bill, and all...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1158
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first thank the Minister, as others have done, for the amount of time he has taken on this Bill. Our central concern was that this is a London problem, and we created TfL to look after London’s problems. Now, I am in favour of TfL—somewhat biasedly, because...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1161
House
House of Lords

It is not necessarily our policy though.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
834 c241GC
House
House of Lords

At page 143, paragraph 8.111 of the Companion says:

“The proceedings and forms of words for amendments and clauses in Grand Committee are identical to those in a Committee of the whole House save that no votes may take place. Normally only one bill per day may be considered in Grand...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
834 c252GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lancaster, for bringing forward this Bill and indicate unambiguous support for it from the Labour Party. To equip myself to say a few words, I read the Library briefing which, as ever, was excellent, and I think I understand the Bill. In...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2009-2010
House
House of Lords

We do not have a fixed view on this proposal and therefore will listen to the response of the Government. At an individual level, when invited to pay my off-sets to British Airways, I am deeply suspicious of them making any useful contribution. My general view on this Bill is...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2023
Reference
828 c321GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not formally have a view on these amendments. It seems that they would have wide-ranging implications, and I shall consult with colleagues throughout Parliament about how we should come back to this issue. If a piece of legislation is proposed and supported by the noble Lord,...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2023
Reference
828 c329GC
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Baroness accept that we have heard that speech before? With every complex Bill where we have sought ways to have more control over statutory instruments, we get the same speech—that it has all been worked through, that the constraints are there and so on. Those of us...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 March 2023
Reference
828 c331GC
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage tenth day. Clauses 72 to 75 agreed to. Clause 76, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 77 to 79 agreed to. Bill reported with amendments (HL Bill 124).

Lead member
Baroness Penn
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
23 March 2023
Reference
828 cc315-340GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to make some general comments, we welcome the Bill. I think everybody has been shocked by P&O’s behaviour, but this goes a bit deeper than that. I had no idea how badly seamen are paid. It is disgraceful. This is clearly a worldwide problem, and there are problems...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2022
Reference
824 c1505
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for Amendment 3. Moving on to Amendments 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, I am more sympathetic with the Government than any of the previous speakers. These sorts of powers are necessary. Arguably, the way pressure is put on harbours to do the right thing is...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2022
Reference
824 c1513
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is quite a good case for the noble Baroness’s amendment, but I accept that the Government have, I hope, expended an awful lot of effort working through the intricacies of how this will happen. I fear that passing the amendment at this point would unduly stop this...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2022
Reference
824 c1516
House
House of Lords