Skip to main content

1-20 of 26 results for subject:Dissolution

Member X
Lord Tyler

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Tyler, Lord (26)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, according to Mr Johnson, the public “don’t give a monkey’s” whether he and his party have cheated and broken electoral law, so did the election results last week bear him out? They did up to a point; 36% voted for his candidates and 64% did not. Taking turnout...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2021
Reference
812 cc210-2
House
House of Lords

Yes.

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c829
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Pannick, and his distinguished collaborators have, as ever, tabled very interesting, very seductive, amendments. I examined them with great care because I respect their expertise. Reluctantly, I believe the amendments are flawed. The purpose of the Bill is to do one very simple thing: to remove...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c826-8
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness may recall that I was elected on 1 March 1974, and given the convention—it was referred to earlier—that normally it is six months before another election is agreed to by the monarch, that would have been precisely the situation. It was entirely wrong that the Prime Minister...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c828-9
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has made a very important point about protecting the constitution. Has he considered the consequences, in terms of a very considerable constitutional crisis, if, under the wording of this amendment, one House votes in one way and the other House votes in the other way? That would...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c838
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has been a doughty defender of the constitution for many years in both Houses. I respect him very much for that and I have expressed that view previously. Can he explain to your Lordships why he now thinks, after 100 years of experience of a quinquennial maximum...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
727 c786
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have the greatest respect for my noble friend Lord Norton of Louth, who has unrivalled academic expertise and authority in matters of this sort. I am a mere practitioner, so my contribution to this debate is very much probing, rather than definitive. I am generally concerned about...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1117-8
House
House of Lords

He may well have said that, but actually what he put on the table before the electorate in 1974, which I remember very well, was that his Government were challenging the country to say whether his Government—and the elected representative Members of the House of Commons who gave confidence to...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1118
House
House of Lords

We should look at the precedent for such certification, which is surely the Parliament Acts. Equally, that is a factual situation, but certification is to put it beyond the shadow of doubt that a certain process has taken place within a particular timeframe. That will then be, one would hope,...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1149
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is not new. Surely in a parliamentary democracy the Government require the confidence of the House of Commons. If they have that confidence, they can then continue.

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1123
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the authors of this amendment are so distinguished that I speak with even more trepidation than usual. They have shown characteristic confidence in proposing a complete removal of Clause 2 and its replacement with their own model. However, I suggest to the Committee that their self-confidence may in...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1192-4
House
House of Lords

I do not agree with the noble Lord. There are people who will always want to subject the decisions of a Prime Minister to judicial review. As I understand it from the legal advice that I have received, such applications are much more likely to be considered by a court...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2011
Reference
726 c1194-5
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether my noble friend recalls that not only the noble Lord, Lord Wills, but all his political colleagues in another place promoted that legislation in terms precisely of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act and the control of the expenditure of political parties. Why have the noble...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c500
House
House of Lords

Is that not a very good argument for adopting the solution that we are proposing that it should then be a political decision and that we do not try to foresee unforeseen circumstances? I speak as somebody who fought a by-election at the height of the Falklands war. That was...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2011
Reference
726 c555
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether the noble Lord recognises that if he had not spoken at such length we could have progressed on to Amendment 11 this evening.

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c230
House
House of Lords

We should be absolutely clear what precisely the amendments in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Howarth of Newport, would do. They would put back into the hands of the Prime Minister of the day, the leader of one of the political parties, the opportunity to pick a good...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c222-3
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord referred to slumbering Members on this side of the House. There is photographic evidence that the only people who actually went to sleep were people listening to his speech on his side of the House.

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c160
House
House of Lords

I am very glad that the noble Lord, Lord Bach, preceded me because it gives me an opportunity to congratulate yet another sinner on repenting when I hear from him the admission that Ministers occasionally give us honeyed words and assure us that action will be taken when, in the...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c168-9
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord and I both served for many months on the working group chaired by his colleague, Mr Jack Straw, when we looked in very considerable detail at the various proposals for reform of your Lordships’ House. At not one single moment through the whole of that White Paper’s...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2011
Reference
726 c190-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have heard so often from those Benches the expression that the public are in support of something because the polls show that and because a large majority of people voted for those parties. That is what people do at general elections. They do not vote for every...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2010
Reference
719 c175
House
House of Lords