Skip to main content

1-20 of 318 results for subject:Prices

Member X
Malcolm Wicks

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Wicks, Malcolm (318)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

This is not the point that I was going to make, but I recall the previous, Labour Government making the difficult decision on nuclear so convincingly that even the Liberal Democrats are now in support. On the long-term issue, however, what is missing from this debate is the global dimension,...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2012
Reference
538 c266
House
House of Commons

If the last Labour Government did nothing about energy policy, I cannot think why I was so busy all the time. To raise the tone of this discussion, I welcome what the Secretary of State said about long-term contracts, and I would like to hear more. On carbon capture and...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2011
Reference
536 c305
House
House of Commons

I will put to one side a Liberal Democrat Secretary of State attacking the Labour Government for being slow to build nuclear reactors, which shows a capacity for humour that I admire. Do the Secretary of State and the Department now have contractual details from our gas supply companies, which...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
531 c183-4
House
House of Commons

I have a question about the private rented sector, and I ask it in a spirit of non-partisanship because I know that the Secretary of State likes that kind of thing. I welcome what he has said about putting some pressure on landlords but, given that the public sector will...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
527 c1063-4
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is making a very thoughtful speech. Does he agree that there is a geopolitical and a national security implication? With global demand for energy increasing by a third or more over the next two decades, at the very time when the United Kingdom is becoming more...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c592
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
527 c592
House
House of Commons

I am enjoying my hon. Friend's remarks on what remains one of Britain's greatest industries, but does he agree that there is a national security and geopolitical dimension to the issue? As events in northern Africa and in the middle east show, much of the gas and oil in the...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2011
Reference
527 c90
House
House of Commons

This is a very useful debate. I particularly enjoyed the three well-informed and well-evidenced speeches on energy policy and the implications of the proposed tax changes for the North sea. A bit of my past tempts me to follow the theme of energy, but instead, I shall talk about the...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2011
Reference
527 c99-100
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend wants to become one of the centenarians. Indeed, to warm us up for difficult decisions, the DWP is now telling us, courtesy of statistics from the Office for National Statistics, that 11 million people alive today can expect to live to 100. That is an extraordinary piece...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2011
Reference
527 c102-3
House
House of Commons

Such policies have regressive implications and I understand why the hon. Gentleman asks that question—a not dissimilar one could be asked of VAT contributions. Deeply regressive changes to how we gather money in from the wider community are taking place. Although the contributory principle has for many years, and arguably...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2011
Reference
527 c100-2
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for so graciously giving way. He has spent most of his speech listing the contents of the Bill. Will he find time soon to respond to the debate?

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2011
Reference
527 c136
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2011
Reference
527 c135
House
House of Commons
On energy security, will Ministers examine critically the supply obligation that we place on companies, given that the tendency to buy short term rather than long term, and sometimes on the spot market, means that there can be no absolute guarantee that the supply will be in place in critical and extreme times for the world?
Asked by
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2010
Reference
520 c1046
House
House of Commons

I welcome the idea of an annual energy statement and, indeed, much of this statement's content, particularly what I think is a step forward—the assertion that new nuclear will play a part in meeting our energy needs. Given the coalition's differences as was—or perhaps as still—who has ministerial responsibility for...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 July 2010
Reference
514 c871-2
House
House of Commons

Indeed. Is the Secretary of State factoring in new nuclear power when it comes to carbon emissions? Does he recognise that in order to drive forward new nuclear power he must play a decisive, hands-on role?

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2010
Reference
510 c310
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the Secretary of State on his appointment. I am not sure who he was looking at just then, because Labour Members were very decisive about the need for new nuclear power. When you examine the transition to a low-carbon economy, are you factoring new nuclear power in or...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2010
Reference
510 c310
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend agree that, although the new Secretary of State seems to wish to adopt a laissez-faire approach—"It's nothing to do with me; it's up to the industry on nuclear"—the reality is that, whether on the generic assessment of the technology, siting arrangements or deep geological disposal,...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2010
Reference
510 c320
House
House of Commons

Understandably, the context for much of this debate has been the appalling conditions facing our country this winter, and we should remember the elderly at risk from the cold. We often talk about global warming, but many of our elderly would say that the chance of warmth would be a...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2010
Reference
503 c781-3
House
House of Commons

I have listened very carefully to what the hon. Gentleman has said about the critical issue of CCS, and he has talked about urgency. What would a future Government do that is not being proposed by the Secretary of State? I am not clear about that and I am not...

Member
Malcolm Wicks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2009
Reference
502 c56
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform on what dates since 1 May 1997 his Department has re-evaluated its oil price projections for 2020; and what the projected figure was on each date.

Asked by
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Question originally printed on 01/07/2008 at 478 c809W.
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c1115W; 213489
House
House of Commons