Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:Parcels

Member X
Baroness Wilcox

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Wilcox, Baroness (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I very much understand and appreciate the sentiments behind these amendments. Royal Mail has a tremendous history and heritage. I know that the noble Lords, Lord Clarke and Lord Christopher, have both campaigned to secure Royal Mail’s future for many years, and they have a strong desire to...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1809-11
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the primary purpose of the Bill is to protect the universal service. The Bill requires Ofcom to secure the provision of the universal service and to ensure that it is meeting the reasonable needs of users. Indeed, that latter point is a requirement not just of this Bill...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1782-5
House
House of Lords

I apologise. Scrap that. How about Amendment 24NZA? This amendment is tabled in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Young, and is concerned with removing the ability to designate, in extremely limited circumstances, more than one company as a universal service provider. The intention of Clause 34 is to...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1792-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments relates to the actions that could be taken if Ofcom found that there was an unfair financial burden on the universal service provider as a result of its complying with its universal service obligation to ensure that consumers are protected under the new regulatory...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1790-2
House
House of Lords

In these amendments, noble Lords express a concern that has been debated at length in the other place and in other fora—namely, that taking Post Office Ltd out of the Royal Mail group of companies will put at risk the commercial relationship between Royal Mail and Post Office Ltd, and...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1798-800
House
House of Lords

We have gone on record in the other place and I have repeated it here today. I have no doubt that the noble Lord will read it but I will write to him to clarify further, as best I may. I understand about the business. In fact, the contract was...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1800
House
House of Lords

I will of course add the comments of the noble Viscount, Lord Eccles, to those that we have already heard in this debate. They will form part of our discussion before we come back at Report.

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1812
House
House of Lords

31: Schedule 12, page 149, line 30, leave out paragraph 174 Amendment 31 agreed. Schedule 12, as amended, agreed. Clauses 90 and 91 agreed. Bill reported with amendments.

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1824
House
House of Lords

26: Clause 80, page 49, line 20, at end insert— ““An order under this subsection is subject to negative resolution procedure.”” Amendment 26 agreed. Amendment 26A not moved. Clause 80, as amended, agreed. Schedule 12 : Minor and consequential amendments Amendment 27 Schedule 12 : Minor and consequential amendments Amendment...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1822
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many small packets and parcels were received by the Royal Mail from the Channel Islands in each of the past 10 years for which records are available.

Asked by
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 February 2011
Reference
6904; 725 c196WA
House
House of Lords