Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:"Lord Chancellor"

Member X
Lord Woolf

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Woolf, Lord (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, we have had great help on this subject in the preceding speeches. Perhaps I should begin by giving my thanks to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, who is in his place, because many years ago he gave me the task of looking at civil justice with...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2018
Reference
791 cc614-5
House
House of Lords

There is an answer to the problem that the noble and learned Lord raises. It might have implications for the workload of the judiciary but I think that could be handled. We should get away from the idea that a judge should assess damages in appropriate cases only at one...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 May 2018
Reference
791 c619
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is very difficult to follow three such distinguished speeches on this subject. I listened to what the noble Lord, Lord Lang, had to say, followed by my fellow Geordie, the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, who showed huge generosity to a rather more junior Geordie in the matters...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2015
Reference
764 cc113-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I disclose my interests as in the register.

The title of the debate refers to legal systems. I emphasise that at the outset because, having fulfilled the role that I have, I would not want it to be thought that I was not conscious of the importance of the...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
755 cc329-332
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to be able to say that this debate has exceeded all my expectations. This is because of the quality and spirit in which contributions have been made. It is not for me now to take up the time of the House by going over...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
755 cc363-6
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of the contribution made by the legal systems of this country to the international standing of the United Kingdom and the observance of the rule of law in this country and abroad. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Woolf
Answering member
Lord Faulks
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates
Date
10 July 2014
Reference
755 cc328-365
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree entirely with what has been said so far about the inappropriateness of altering the Lord Chancellor’s position from that contained in the 2005 Act. I do not propose to repeat the reasons for that, since they have already been given. I will try to identify, however,...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 cc254-5
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord explain how the risk to which he has just referred would be any greater than that which already exists in the words of Clause 1(1)—that the Lord Chancellor must secure that legal aid is made available in accordance with this part?

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1566
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support what the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has put before us. Doing my very best, I have found it very difficult to find any reason why this amendment should not be accepted. Attempting to rely upon what was said in the other place just does not wash....

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1564-5
House
House of Lords

No one can anticipate what might happen with regard to the conduct of a particular Lord Chancellor in the future. However, in regard to the fears that have been expressed, there would be no possibility of those being treated as appropriate cases for an application for judicial review on the...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1565
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as is always the case, the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has summarised the arguments in support of the amendment with admirable clarity. There is very little that I can add but, looking at these provisions, I should have thought that the Minister—although he may prove me completely wrong—would...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c85-6
House
House of Lords

As someone who was a member of such a committee, I should say that it also included members of the Bar. In view of what is happening to legal aid, members of the Bar may well be interested in performing this function.

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I say a few words in support of this proposal? Expert evidence is an area in which the courts have had considerable difficulties in the past. However, following on from what the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, said, it is right to acknowledge that great progress has been...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2012
Reference
734 c18
House
House of Lords