Skip to main content

1-20 of 72 results for subject:Technology

Member X
Lord Young of Norwood Green

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Young of Norwood Green, Lord (72)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I too congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, on creating the opportunity for this debate. However, I have some concern that the failure to meet the 0.7% target is portrayed as an abandonment of overseas

aid. So far only one noble Lord, the noble Lord, Lord Bates, has...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2021
Reference
813 cc742-979
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, congratulate my noble friend Lord Knight on ensuring a debate on this vital issue and on his tour de force contribution. I thank the Library for producing its usual high-quality briefing. I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Wyld, on her contribution. However, I make one small...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
785 cc357-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, congratulate the noble Baroness on securing this debate. We share an interest in this area, and I like to think of her as a friend as well. I declare an interest as chair of the governing body of my local primary school. I have been on...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2017
Reference
783 cc2591-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hear what the Minister says about EU funding and assessment, but will she comment on the fact that although the science budget was protected from government cuts, five years of ring-fencing have effectively reduced UK science spending by around 15%? Is the Minister concerned about that?

Asked by
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 June 2015
Reference
762 c1357
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome the efforts of the university technical colleges, careers advisory and others, but what we really need for young people is more apprenticeships. That has to be the focus. I have looked at the figures in this area, and they are rising but slightly. There is one area where the Government could make a positive contribution, and that is in public procurement contracts. We still have a Government who will not insist that, every time a public procurement contract is let, those who get it have to indicate how many apprentices they will take on. Will the Minister explain why the Government will not move on this issue? After all, this would be a case of them leading by example.

Asked by
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 November 2012
Reference
740 c1711
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, as the other non-scientist and I enter the debate with some trepidation after hearing the contributions. First, I welcome the report and I thank the noble Lord, Lord Sutherland, for his introduction. He said that the UK was a good place...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 June 2011
Reference
728 c336-8
House
House of Lords

126: Clause 19, page 23, line 40, leave out "and any consequences of the failure"

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1501
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it was never the Government’s intention that a registry would have to pay compensation to any party affected by a serious failure of a domain registry. The words, ""any consequences of the failure"," were meant to ensure that a registry would ensure that the failure concerned never happened...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1501-2
House
House of Lords

127: Clause 19, page 24, line 10, at end insert— "( ) The Secretary of State must discharge the order before the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the day on which it was made (but this does not prevent the Secretary of State from making a...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1502
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we considered the points made in Committee by noble Lords on the question of how long the appointed manager to an internet domain registry would be in place. We were particularly struck by fears that a manager sent in temporarily to correct the failure of a registry could...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1502
House
House of Lords

128: Clause 20, page 25, line 25, leave out "and any consequences of the failure" 129: Clause 20, page 25, line 35, leave out "and any consequences of the failure" Amendments 128 and 129 agreed. Clause 21 : Functions of C4C in relation to media content Amendment 130 Clause 21...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1502
House
House of Lords

I am resisting getting up unnecessarily because I have problems with my hip, so I hope noble Lords will understand that I do not mean to be impolite when I nod in the affirmative. Before I speak to the amendments, it is worth my recalling what gave rise to Clause...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1459-62
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when a cost is placed on industry, ultimately there is a high likelihood that the consumer pays. It would be impossible to audit all ISPs to ensure that none of the cost associated with the notification process was passed on to consumers. Whether ISPs absorb all the costs...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1454-5
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, for giving me the opportunity to address the point that concerns him. It picks up on the point made previously by the noble Earl, Lord Erroll. We believe that the Secretary of State is bound to act reasonably—not because he is always a...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1500-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what is proposed here is a further test of a relevant failure by an internet domain registry. The effect of the amendment is that a registry could delay or avoid action by claiming it could do nothing because it was not its responsibility. This would leave the Secretary...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1499-500
House
House of Lords

125: Clause 18, page 22, leave out lines 40 and 41 Amendment 125 agreed. Clause 19 : Appointment of manager of internet domain registry Amendment 126 Clause 19 : Appointment of manager of internet domain registry Amendment 126 Moved by

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1501
House
House of Lords

124: Clause 18, page 22, line 34, at end insert— "( ) In subsection (3) "prescribed" means prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State. ( ) Before making regulations under subsection (3) the Secretary of State must consult such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate."

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1501
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have listened carefully to the points made in Committee by the noble Earl, Lord Erroll, about the need for prior consultation. It was always the Government’s intention to consult before the Secretary of State decided to exercise the powers. The amendment establishes a requirement in the Bill...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1501
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while I have much sympathy with the objective of ensuring that people who have nothing to do with online infringement of copyright are left in peace to enjoy all the riches that the internet has to offer, I do not think that this is an amendment that we...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1487
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall start with Amendment 103. I am surprised that the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, wants to see the removal of this provision, which is there to protect subscribers. It will ensure, so far as is practicable, that a subscriber who has successfully appealed against a notification, should...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1491-2
House
House of Lords