Skip to main content

1-20 of 21 results for subject:Subscriptions

Member X
Baroness Neville-Rolfe

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Neville-Rolfe, Baroness (21)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the regulations are known as the check-off regulations and stem from

Section 15 of the Trade Union Act 2016. This is the last secondary legislation to be brought into force as part of that Act; each aimed at modernising industrial relations in the UK. I am pleased to...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
834 cc395-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Wallace of Saltaire, and the noble Baroness, Lady Chapman of Darlington, for their contributions to the debate and the good questions that they have asked. I should perhaps start with the noble Lord’s description of the wide-ranging nature of the...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
834 cc405-6GC
House
House of Lords

I cannot just accept that, I have to say; I believe that views from all different directions can be valuable in debate, and that includes the TaxPayers’ Alliance. I explained why it had done some work in this area. It was used in these estimates—entirely transparently—and we have also taken...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
834 c406GC
House
House of Lords

I commend officials for producing a detailed impact assessment and I will not renege on that. I also think that the TaxPayers’

Alliance is a perfectly respectable source. Obviously, every think tank has different people working for it; some people are excellent at estimates and some are not. I have...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
834 cc406-7GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Answering member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
18 December 2023
Reference
834 cc395-407GC
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage fourth day. Clause 14 agreed to. Part 1 of 2.

Lead member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Department
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 cc400-434
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Wheeler, for her clear, comprehensive and relatively succinct introduction to this enormous group. It is plain that the sense of the Committee is that there are concerns about Clause 14, for reasons that have been fully debated. However, we have looked carefully...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c427
House
House of Lords

I suspect that if it was starting now, rather than 100 years ago, things would be different because of the direction of travel.

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c427
House
House of Lords

I think we have set out clearly in our impact assessment and elsewhere the way things are going. There is clear evidence that there has been a big move to direct debits, internet banking et cetera. I do not think anyone could dispute that. As a former employer in the...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c427
House
House of Lords

I think check-off existed for a number of years at Tesco, long before I arrived. We had the partnership agreement to which the noble Lord refers in the late 1990s, and I was involved in that. Check-off is part of the arrangements. In the Bill, we are not seeking to...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c427
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is right in saying that the direction of travel is driven by digital change—I am not disputing that—and that a fair number of things are deducted at source. However—and I am trying to find my notes—they nearly all have tax or national insurance involved.

1.45 pm

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c428
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord makes a fair point. Having said that, the growth of direct debit in lots of areas has continued. As I have said, I do not think we are ruling out a union accepting cash or alternative payment arrangements. We are trying to make a change...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c430
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the difference is that the cost falls on the public sector.

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c430
House
House of Lords

The answer is that I think the impact assessment says there is a cost of £7.2 million. I was seeking to answer the question that had been raised.

Amendment 92 would allow check-off to remain and replace the prohibition with a statutory obligation for ACAS to create a code of practice....

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 cc430-1
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble friend for his intervention. I have said from the very beginning that we are listening during this Committee stage. Having said that, it is only right that I set out clearly the reasons why we believe that this clause is the right one and is needed,...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c431
House
House of Lords

I have already sought to answer this question. Deductions for things like pensions, childcare vouchers, Cycle to Work and all the other things that have been mentioned have tax or national insurance implications so it makes sense for them to be made through payroll. The collection of union subscriptions should...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c431
House
House of Lords

I am not sure I entirely understand the point. If I may, I will reflect on it.

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c432
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend. I am not making any commitments about government policy in any of these areas. I am seeking to explain that there is a difference of logic—perhaps not very effectively, but I am trying to do just that today.

I was trying to respond to the noble...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 c432
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend. We are debating check-off in relation to Clause 4. The Public and Commercial Services Union on its website quotes a member who said of direct debit:

“It’s the easiest way of paying my union subs. You know then that it’s going to get paid...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 February 2016
Reference
769 cc428-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for raising this issue, which I was intending to cover today. To assist the House, I am happy to clarify that the Government have already published consultation impact assessments alongside the public consultations that support our package of reforms, as well as an...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 January 2016
Reference
768 cc12-5
House
House of Lords