1-7 of 7 results for subject:Misconduct
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.309 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Misconduct
- We searched for
- subject_t:Misconduct OR subject_t:Malpractice OR subject_t:"Professional misconduct" OR subject_ses:92051
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many cases of alleged (a) misconduct and (b) gross misconduct by prison officers that reach proceedings have (i) not been proven, (ii) led to management advice, (iii) led to a written warning and (iv) led to dismissal in each of the...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many cases of alleged (a) misconduct and (b) gross misconduct by prison officers that reach proceedings have (i) not been proven, (ii) led to management advice, (iii) led to a written warning and (iv) led to dismissal in each of the...
Table 1: Conduct & discipline cases1 for misconduct and gross misconduct by band 3-5 prison officers2, by outcome3, 2015/16 to 2017/18
| Misconduct | 2015/16 | 2016/17 | 2017/18 | |
| Not been proven | 10 | 26 | 13 |
Management advice & guidance | 20 | 29 | 19 | |
Written warning | 178 | 202 | 197 | |
Dismissal | ~ | ~ | ~ | |
Other outcomes4 | 71 | 55 | 64 | |
| Gross Misconduct | 2015/16 | 2016/17 | 2017/18 | |
| Not been proven | 12
| 7 | 6 |
Management advice & guidance | 4 | 7 | 8 | |
Written warning | 59 | 56 | 70 | |
Dismissal | 72 | 74 | 80 | |
Other outcomes4 | 28 | 35 | 52 | |
Notes:
Notes:
1. A case is defined as a unique combination of case and individual member of staff. Where more than one member of staff is involved in a single case these are counted separately in this table. Equally staff involved in more than one case during the year are counted multiple times.
2. Includes Band 3-4 / Prison Officer (incl specialists), Band 4 / Supervising Officer and Band 5 / Custodial Managers.
3. Information on the outcomes of any appeal is not included.
4. Includes where cases have been withdrawn/closed or where other disciplinary action was taken, such as financial penalties, regrades/downgrades, verbal warnings.
'~ denotes suppressed values of 2 or fewer or other values which would allow values of 2 or fewer to be derived by subtraction. Low numbers are suppressed to prevent disclosure in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many cases of alleged (a) misconduct and (b) gross misconduct by prison officers that lead to proceedings following an investigation lasting more than 12 months have (i) not been proven, (ii) led to management advice being issued, (iii) led to a...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many cases of alleged (a) misconduct and (b) gross misconduct by prison officers that lead to proceedings following an investigation lasting more than 12 months have (i) not been proven, (ii) led to management advice being issued, (iii) led to a...
|
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent assessment his Department has made of the number of Civil and Family Court cases where decisions were taken on the basis of manipulated forensic testing provided by (a) Randox and (b) Trimega.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent assessment his Department has made of the number of Civil and Family Court cases where decisions were taken on the basis of manipulated forensic testing provided by (a) Randox and (b) Trimega.
Greater Manchester Police are undertaking an ongoing, expansive criminal investigation into alleged manipulation of toxicology results by individuals who were employed at Trimega, and later Randox Testing Services (RTS) after Trimega’s liquidation in 2014.
The investigation will seek to determine how many cases may have been affected and retesting of samples continues at pace. As such, it is not possible to provide an estimate of the number of cases affected at this time.
A bespoke court process has been implemented so that individuals who are concerned about the outcome of cases involving tests performed by Trimega can apply to the court to consider setting aside or changing their order.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prison officers have been placed under investigation for (a) less than one month, (b) between one and three months, (c) between three and six months, (d) between six and 12 months and (e) over 12 months due to alleged (i)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prison officers have been placed under investigation for (a) less than one month, (b) between one and three months, (c) between three and six months, (d) between six and 12 months and (e) over 12 months due to alleged (i)...
Table 1a - Number of Prison Officers1,2 (headcount) subject to Conduct and Discipline investigations due to Misconduct, by length of investigation3, 2015/16 to 2017/18
| 2015/16 | 2016/17 | 2017/18 |
Less than one month | 123 | 138 | 130 |
Between one and three months | 144 | 162 | 138 |
Between three and six months | 18 | 16 | 18 |
Between six and 12 months | 5 | 11 | 4 |
Over 12 months | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Table 1b - Number of Prison Officers1,2 (headcount) subject to Conduct and Discipline investigations due to Gross Misconduct, by length of investigation3, 2015/16 to 2017/18
| 2015/16 | 2016/17 | 2017/18 |
Less than one month | 20 | 19 | 21 |
between one and three months | 111 | 103 | 118 |
between three and six months | 12 | 9 | 12 |
between six and 12 months | ~ | 5 | ~ |
over 12 months | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Notes:
1. Includes Band 3-4 / Prison Officer (incl. specialists), Band 4 / Supervising Officer and Band 5 / Custodial Managers.
2. Staff with at least one conduct and discipline case concluded during the year.
- Staff with no end date in the data, indicating open cases, have been excluded.
'~ denotes suppressed values of 2 or fewer or other values which would allow values of 2 or fewer to be derived by subtraction. Low numbers are suppressed to prevent disclosure in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of disciplinary cases in which prison officers have been placed under investigation lasting (a) less than one month, (b) between one and three months, (c) between three and six months, (d) between six and twelve months and (e) over twelve...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of disciplinary cases in which prison officers have been placed under investigation lasting (a) less than one month, (b) between one and three months, (c) between three and six months, (d) between six and twelve months and (e) over twelve...
Table 1a: Proportion of Conduct and Discipline cases1, involving Prison Officers2, which progressed to misconduct proceedings, by length of investigation3, 2015/16 to 2017/18
| 2015/16 | 2016/17 | 2017/18 |
Less than one month | 75% | 71% | 74% |
Between one and three months | 53% | 58% | 48% |
Between three and six months | 47% | 60% | 47% |
Between six and 12 months | 50% | 63% | 67% |
Over 12 months | 100% | 100% | 14% |
Table 1b: Proportion of Conduct and Discipline cases1, involving Prison Officers3, which progressed to gross misconduct proceedings, by length of investigation3, 2015/16 to 2017/18
| 2015/16 | 2016/17 | 2017/18 |
Less than one month | 20% | 20% | 24% |
between one and three months | 45% | 40% | 49% |
between three and six months | 43% | 36% | 43% |
between six and 12 months | 17% | 38% | 33% |
over 12 months | 0% | 0% | 86% |
Notes:
1. A case is defined as a unique combination of case and individual member of staff. Where more than one member of staff is involved in a single case these are counted separately in this table. Equally staff involved in more than one case during the year are counted multiple times.
2. Includes Band 3-4 / Prison Officer (incl. specialists), Band 4 / Supervising Officer and Band 5 / Custodial Managers.
3. Staff with no end date in the data, indicating open cases, have been excluded
indicated assent.
indicated assent.
A free and independent press, especially local press, is a pillar of our democracy. It is vital that the press adhere to the highest ethical and journalistic standards and that any criminal allegations are fully investigated, and it is also vital that that freedom is preserved and respected. It is...
A free and independent press, especially local press, is a pillar of our democracy. It is vital that the press adhere to the highest ethical and journalistic standards and that any criminal allegations are fully investigated, and it is also vital that that freedom is preserved and respected. It is...