Skip to main content

1-20 of 33 results for subject:Monarchy

Member X
Nick Thomas-Symonds

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Thomas-Symonds, Nick (33)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the answer of 9 June 2026 to Question 4176 on Monarchy: information, whether he has considered initiating legal action to obtain official information held by the Crown retained by Lord Mandelson and not disclosed for the purposes of the Government...

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2026
Reference
12158
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether official information is considered to be held by the Crown when a Crown Servant leaves Crown service and retains such information on (a) personal devices and (b) non-government communication channel.

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 June 2026
Reference
4176
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that public sector bodies use the King's cypher rather than Queen Elizabeth II’s cypher.

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 November 2024
Reference
14068
House
House of Commons

To be clear, the Lord Great Chamberlain and the Earl Marshal will not continue to sit and vote in the House of Lords under this Bill, but they will continue with their important ceremonial functions.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c732
House
House of Commons

Second reading. Reasoned amendment negatived on division (105 to 453). Main question agreed to. Programme motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Nick Thomas-Symonds
Answering member
John Glen; Oliver Dowden; Ellie Reeves
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 cc718-800
House
House of Commons

I cannot comment on the hon. Gentleman’s cynicism about progress, but our manifesto clearly sets out the Government’s position, which is that we should have an alternative second Chamber that is more representative of the nations and regions.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c722
House
House of Commons

It is great to have my hon. Friend’s support. As the Leader of the House of Lords said when this matter was debated a few weeks ago in the other place, for the last 25 years, one of the arguments has been that nothing should be done until everything can...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c722
House
House of Commons

I have already given way to the right hon. Gentleman once.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c722
House
House of Commons

In a moment.

It is not right that what was seen, even in 1999, as a temporary arrangement should persist any longer. This Government were elected on a manifesto that was explicit in its promises that we would bring about immediate reform by removing the right of hereditary peers to sit...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c722
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

As set out in our manifesto, this Government are committed to reforming the House of Lords. As a result, I am proud to be taking forward our first commitment: the immediate first step to remove the right of...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c719
House
House of Commons

No, because the monarchy is a completely different part of our constitution. First, no monarch since Queen Anne has refused Royal Assent to a law. Secondly, our constitutional monarchy enjoys popular support. I return the right hon. Gentleman’s respect, and the one thing he is is honest. He is actually...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c719
House
House of Commons

I am certainly in favour of the representation of different faiths in the upper House, but the Government set out a step-by-step process in our manifesto.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c720
House
House of Commons

I will come back to the right hon. Gentleman after making some progress.

Our manifesto sets out a series of steps, which is the key point. This Government have a mandate to reform the House of Lords.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c720
House
House of Commons

One moment. I will come back to the right hon. Gentleman.

Our manifesto sets out that there should be an alternative second Chamber that is more representative of the nations and regions of the United Kingdom. We have been elected on a manifesto to get there on a step-by-step basis.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c720
House
House of Commons

As this is his third attempt, I will show sympathy.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c720
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to hear the right hon. Gentleman’s support for the other steps in our manifesto, which he should have communicated to Conservative Front Benchers when they were drafting their reasoned amendment—[Interruption.] It looks like it too. If the right hon. Gentleman reads our manifesto with his usual diligence,...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c720
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. As we look to the other reforms, from the retirement age to participation, the Government will look to build wide support on the way forward—support that, frankly, has not been found in previous attempts at reform. At its heart is the principle that...

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c721
House
House of Commons

The Church has recognised the need for reform, particularly in terms of size, and today’s debate is further evidence of why it is sensible to reform in stages.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c721
House
House of Commons

After the past 14 years, they now show a new-found enthusiasm for reform and change.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c721
House
House of Commons

I will give way once more, and then I need to make some progress.

Member
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c721
House
House of Commons