Skip to main content

1-20 of 119 results for subject:Consumers

Member X
Viscount Camrose

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Camrose, Viscount (119)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Gustafsson
Answering member
Viscount Camrose
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 cc297-303GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing this SI and the noble Lord, Lord Fox, for his characteristically thought-provoking remarks, particularly those on the dynamics of data bridges between the EU and the US, which were very pertinent.

The measures in this SI are intended to facilitate the effective implementation...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 cc301-2GC
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 8 disagreed to on division (86 to 167). Amendments 9 and 14 agreed to. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath; Lord Leong
Answering member
Viscount Camrose; Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Date
26 February 2025
Reference
843 cc1769-1785
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 34, 35, 36 and 37, in the name of my noble friend Lord Holmes, and Amendment 43, in the name of my noble friend Lord Sharpe. I draw noble Lords’ attention to the fact that I am not doing so from the Front...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2025
Reference
843 cc1777-8
House
House of Lords

Lords second reading. Agreed to on question. Bill committed to a Committee of the Whole House.

Lead member
Lord Redesdale
Answering member
Viscount Camrose; Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Date
6 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1371-1396
House
House of Lords

I join other noble Lords in thanking the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale, for bringing this hugely important topic to us today. I thank all noble Lords who have spoken so well and so fascinatingly in this debate. I appreciated the horrifying example offered by the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, of...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1388-1391
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendments and reasons. Lords amendments 9 and 19 not insisted on. Lords amendments 12 and 13 not insisted on. Lords amendments 26, 27, 28, 31 and 32 not insisted on and Lords amendments 32B and 32C in lieu disagreed to on division (221 to 222). Lords...

Lead member
Viscount Camrose; Lord Offord of Garvel
Answering member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch; Lord Leong
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology; Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent sought.
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Viscount Camrose

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 c487
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also speak to Motions A1, B, B1, C, C1, C2 and D.

I start by thanking noble Lords for their constructive input and careful scrutiny during the passage of the Bill. We have created legislation that will drive innovation and deliver better outcomes for consumers across the...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 cc487-8
House
House of Lords

That would be in respect only of the fine itself. Any other element of the decision, such as the imposition of new conduct requirements or other actions taken to correct anti-competitive effects in the market, would stand and would have been standing throughout the appeal in any event.

I turn to...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 cc488-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to the debate today and, of course, throughout the development of this legislation. It has been a characteristically brilliant debate; I want to thank all noble Lords for their various and valuable views.

I turn first to the Motions tabled by...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 cc496-8
House
House of Lords

Indeed. In principle I am very happy to update the Explanatory Notes, but I need to engage with ministerial colleagues. However, I see no reason why that would not be possible.

Meanwhile, I hope all noble Lords will feel able to support the Government’s position.

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 c498
House
House of Lords

It goes only so far as its application to the Bill now. I am not aware of any further measures to take it into other Bills and would not expect to see any.

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 c498
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Viscount Camrose:

That this House do not insist on its Amendments 12 and 13, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 13A.

13A: Because it is clearer for proportionality to appear as a separate consideration in the countervailing benefits exemption.

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 c499
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have already spoken to Motion B. I beg to move.

Motion B1 (as an amendment to Motion B)

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 c499
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Viscount Camrose:

That this House do not insist on its Amendments 26, 27, 28, 31 and 32, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 32A.

32A: Because it is appropriate for all appeals about the imposition of a penalty under Chapter 7 of Part 1 to be determined on...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 c499
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have already spoken to Motion C. I beg to move.

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 c499
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Viscount Camrose

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2024
Reference
838 c500
House
House of Lords

Yes, we very much understand the spirit and intent of the amendment, so I would be very happy to consider that if we could expand it to cover the bases, as my noble friend sets out.

Amendment 55, also from my noble friend, would remove the role of the Secretary of...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1833-4
House
House of Lords

Yes, I believe that is the case and I accept that. But, as I said, I will commit to carrying out a review in the future to understand how best to implement a collective action basis.

Under the digital markets regime, the CMA will be—

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2024
Reference
836 c1834
House
House of Lords