Skip to main content

1-20 of 70 results for subject:Software

Member X
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Parkinson of Whitley Bay, Lord (70)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, let me add to this miscellany by speaking to the government amendments that stand in my name as part of this group. The first is Amendment 288A, which we mentioned on the first group of amendments on Report because it relates to the new introductory clause, Clause 1,...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2069-2070
House
House of Lords

We are keen to ensure that coroners have access to the information and expertise that they need, while respecting the independence of the judicial process to decide what they do not know and would like to know more about and the role of the Chief Coroner there. It is a...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2070-1
House
House of Lords

Yes, there is a duty, and the law should be followed. I am not sure whether the noble Lord is suggesting that it is not—

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2071
House
House of Lords

I am not sure that I follow the noble Lord’s question, but perhaps—

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2072
House
House of Lords

If I may, I will write to the noble Lord setting that out; he has lost me with his question. We believe, as I think he said, that the forum has added to the collaboration in this important area.

The noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, raised important questions about avatars and virtual...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2072-3
House
House of Lords

I am happy to provide further detail in writing and to reiterate the points I have made as it is rather technical. Content that is published by providers of user-to-user services themselves is not regulated by the Bill because providers are liable for the content they publish on the services...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2073
House
House of Lords

Yes.

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2074
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay

187: Clause 65, page 62, line 18, leave out from “service” to “down” in line 20 and insert “indicate (in whatever words) that the presence of a particular kind of regulated user-generated content is prohibited on the service, the provider takes”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment makes...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2074-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, transparency and accountability are at the heart of the regulatory framework that the Bill seeks to establish. It is vital that Ofcom has the powers it needs to require companies to publish online safety information and to scrutinise their systems and processes, particularly their algorithms. The Government agree...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2075-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to noble Lords for their contributions in this group. On the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Knight of Weymouth, on why we are bringing in some of these powers now, I say that the power to direct and observe algorithms was previously implicit...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2095-7
House
House of Lords

A provider would have a right to bring a legal challenge against Ofcom if it considered that a particular exercise of the remote access power was unlawful. I am sure that would be looked at swiftly, but I will write to the noble Lord on the anticipated timelines while that...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2098
House
House of Lords

I will write on Schedule 12 as well.

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2098
House
House of Lords

I had not quite finished; the noble Baroness was quick to catch me before I sat down. I still have some way to go, but I will certainly take on board all the points that have been made on this group.

The noble Lord, Lord Knight, asked about Schedule 12. I...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2098
House
House of Lords

I am very happy to discuss this further with noble Lords, but I will reserve the right, pending that discussion, to decide whether we need to return to this at Third Reading.

Amendments 270 and 272, tabled by my noble friend Lady Fraser of Craigmaddie, to whom I am very grateful...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2099
House
House of Lords

We think we can rely on Ofcom’s discretion, and point to its current practice. I hope that will reassure my noble friend that it will set out the information she seeks.

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2100
House
House of Lords

I was about to say that I am very happy to write to the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, about the manner by which consent is given in Clause 53(5)(c), but I think his question is on something else.

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2100
House
House of Lords

Yes, and we can point to the current actions of Ofcom to show that it is indeed doing this already, even without that legislative stick.

I turn to the amendments in the name of my noble friend Lord Bethell and the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, on researchers’ access to data. Amendment...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2100
House
House of Lords

We touched on the complexity of defining who and what is a researcher and making sure that we do not give rise to bad actors exploiting that. This is a complex area, as we touched on in Committee. As I say, the evidence base here is nascent. It is important...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2100
House
House of Lords

We do not think that six weeks is enough time for the evidence base to develop sufficiently, our assessment being that to endow the Secretary of State with that power at this point is premature.

Amendment 262AA would require Ofcom to consider whether it is appropriate to require providers to take...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 cc2101-2
House
House of Lords

I will continue my train of thought on my noble friend’s amendments, which I hope will cover that and more.

My noble friend’s Amendment 273A would allow Ofcom to appoint approved independent researchers to access information. Again, given the nascent evidence base here, it is important to focus on understanding these...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
831 c2102
House
House of Lords