Skip to main content

1-20 of 25 results for subject:Stalking

Member X
Lord Sharpe of Epsom

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Sharpe of Epsom, Lord (25)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to take note of violence against women and girls in the United Kingdom. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Warwick of Undercliffe
Answering member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates
Date
29 June 2023
Reference
831 cc208-141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to all noble Lords who have participated for their valuable, thoughtful and insightful contributions. I particularly thank the noble Baroness, Lady Warwick, for opening this debate on behalf of the noble Baroness, Lady Drake—I am sure that the whole House will join me in...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2023
Reference
831 cc129-842
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the malicious use of Apple AirTags and similar devices to stalk victims without their knowledge; what estimate they have made of the prevalence of this behaviour; and what discussions they have had, or plan to have, with the manufacturers...

Asked by
Marquess of Lothian (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 April 2023
Reference
HL7008
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Statement by Lord Sharpe of Epsom on 20 February (HLWS554), whether their package of measures to tackle violence against women and girls includes provisions to address perpetrators of serious and repeated stalking.

Asked by
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 cc1756-1760
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the announcements made on Monday do cover stalking. We have added violence against women and girls to the strategic policing requirement, meaning that it is set out as a national threat for forces to respond to. Tackling stalking is included in this. Stalking is already one of the offences specified in multi-agency public protection arrangements. This week we announced that the offence of controlling or coercive behaviour will be added alongside it.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1757
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I commend the noble Baroness for her extensive work on this over many years. As I said in my original Answer, we do not need to add stalking because it is already there. Section 4A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, on stalking involving fear of violence or serious alarm or distress, is already in category 2 of the multi-agency public protection arrangements. This means that those sentenced to at least a year for that crime are already subject to active management.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1757
House
House of Lords

I join the noble Lord in wishing the officer in Northern Ireland a speedy and full recovery; it is an awful situation. It is clear that the Government’s activity regarding violence against women and girls—VAWG—is extensive. A number of other initiatives have been taken on stalking: for example, the Ask for ANI scheme, which is being piloted in jobcentres and so on. This is a codeword scheme

developed by the Home Office during Covid-19 to provide a discreet way for victims of domestic abuse to signal that they need emergency help. Significant funding has been committed to this issue, as noble Lords will be aware, and the Online Safety Bill will also include various measures. Work is both ongoing and dynamic.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1757
House
House of Lords

My noble friend asks a good question. We will be changing the law to ensure that dangerous offenders with a conviction for controlling or coercive behaviour who are sentenced to 12 months or more are automatically eligible to be managed under MAPPA. It will require primary legislation, but I am afraid that I cannot give an exact timeframe for that—I suppose the usual phrase is, when parliamentary time allows.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1758
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I accept that there is some regional variation in, for example, applications for stalking protection orders. Where those variations exist, the Safeguarding Minister is planning to write to the various chief constables whose forces applied for fewer than might have been expected, in order to encourage them always to consider these. Forces such as the Met and Kent have been making excellent use of the new orders, applications for which have risen by 31% in a year. So, as regards stalking, it is a very good story; it needs still to improve, of course, but it is getting better.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1758
House
House of Lords

Yes, I can. For example, a couple of new initiatives were announced on Monday, one of which concerns the digital aspects of this. As I am sure many noble Lords are aware, we are strengthening the domestic violence disclosure scheme—sometimes known as Clare’s law—which enables the police to disclose information to an individual about their partner’s

or ex-partner’s previous abusive or violent offending. So my answer is yes: work on this is being strengthened and, as I said in answer to an earlier question, is very much ongoing.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1758
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I have said already, non-domestic stalking is already covered under MAPPA. I would not say that it is not necessary, but it is already there. To a large extent, and to be more specific, it would not have been needed.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1759
House
House of Lords

As I alluded to earlier, the Safeguarding Minister is planning to write to all chief constables whose forces applied for fewer orders than might have been expected. The previous Safeguarding Minister also sent similar letters to chief constables, as has been referenced publicly. Clearly, there is no denying that more needs to be done in certain areas. However, as I have said, the Government are also piloting a number of avenues for people to report such offences, including the Ask for ANI scheme I mentioned earlier. Over 5,000 UK pharmacies—both independents and chains—are now enrolled in that scheme. There are a number of avenues through which victims can report this sort of abuse.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1759
House
House of Lords

My noble friend makes a good point and I will of course reflect her concerns back to the department. However, forces under special measures are obviously subject to significant scrutiny. I cannot say for certain because I have not looked into this, but I would imagine that it forms a key part of the scrutiny under which they operate.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1759
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes a very good suggestion—yes, I will.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1759
House
House of Lords

I would hope that the police are already aware of it. As regards the public, the noble and learned Baroness makes a sensible point; it probably ought to be better known.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1760
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness makes a good point. Of course, this does not respect particular geographical boundaries. It is a devolved matter and, as noble Lords know, operational matters are left to the various police forces, but I will certainly make sure that my colleagues in the devolved departments are aware of the noble Baroness’s concerns.

Answered by
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 February 2023
Reference
827 c1760
House
House of Lords

My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Suella Braverman) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:

Today I am updating Parliament on Home Office delivery since the previous Written Ministerial Statement of 5th September 2022. In the face of an increasingly complex operational context, the...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
19 December 2022
Reference
HLWS460
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharpe of Epsom

109G: After Clause 55, insert the following new Clause—

“Increase in penalty for offences related to game etc

(1) Section 1 of the Night Poaching Act 1828 (taking or destroying game or rabbits by night or entering land for that purpose) is amended in accordance with subsections (2)...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 c1341
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of St Albans for bringing these important matters to the attention of the House. I declare an interest here, as I am a member of the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, which is a member of the hare-coursing coalition.

In...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc1342-4
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords for their warm words, and in particular the right reverend Prelate for his—they are much appreciated. I also join in the general congratulations from around the House on the operations and the work of police forces, in particular—although it is always invidious to single anybody...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 c1346
House
House of Lords