Skip to main content

1-20 of 26 results for subject:Euthanasia

Member X
Baroness Blake of Leeds

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Blake of Leeds, Baroness (26)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Apologies, I was taken by surprise by the lack of an Opposition Front Bench. I thank noble Lords for another important debate on opting into and out of providing assistance and various functions under the Bill. As I have already made clear, I will keep my comments limited to amendments...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1771-2
House
House of Lords

I confirm that it is “may require”: that is the response I wish to give him on that. Again, it is pushing the limits of what I am able to say at this point, in terms of future policy.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
854 c1772
House
House of Lords

I am certainly happy to take the noble Lord’s comments to my noble friend Lady Merron and see whether it is appropriate for her to respond in the way that the noble Lord suggests.

Perhaps I could start again on my response to the noble Baroness, Lady Lawlor. Her amendment would...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1772-4
House
House of Lords

I cannot answer that specific question, and I am not sure it would be appropriate for me to do so. We note the comments that the noble Baroness made.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
854 c1774
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for an important and thoughtful debate this afternoon. As I have already made clear, I will limit my comments to amendments about which the Government have major legal, technical or operational workability concerns. I will speak first to Amendments 212, 215, 217, 218, 214,...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1799-1801
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage thirteenth day. Clauses 5 to 7 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
Answering member
Baroness Blake of Leeds
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Scottish legislative consent correspondence published, Northern Ireland legislative consent sought, Welsh legislative consent granted.
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
854 cc1731-1804
House
House of Lords

I do not think it would be appropriate to comment on that level of detail at this point.

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 c564
House
House of Lords

I hope that noble Lords can listen to what I have to say. The clinical trial processes for approved substances are, of course, an essential part as we move forward.

Amendment 703, also tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Grey-Thompson, would not be workable in its current form. It would require...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 cc567-594
House
House of Lords

Apologies; I thank the noble Baroness for her clarification on that point. I was mid-sentence, so forgive me if I repeat myself. Limiting the number of manufacturers based on prior prescriptions is operationally impractical and could risk supply shortages.

I turn to Amendment 713A from the noble Baroness, Lady Hollins. This...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 c570
House
House of Lords

I would be happy to write to the noble Baronesses with clarification on that point; I thank them for their interventions.

As I was saying, Amendment 713A appears to introduce a parallel approvals regime, but it does not specify how that should relate to the Secretary of State’s separate power under...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 cc571-595
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage eleventh day. Clause 4 agreed to. Clause 5 under consideration.

Lead member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
Answering member
Baroness Levitt; Baroness Blake of Leeds
Department
Ministry of Justice; Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Scottish legislative consent correspondence published, Northern Ireland legislative consent sought, Welsh legislative consent granted.
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 cc526-629
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for taking part in the debate so far today. As we know, this group of amendments focuses on two core subjects: first, adding a new multidisciplinary panel process into the Bill, tabled by the noble Baroness, Lady Finlay, and secondly, amendments in relation...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 cc590-554
House
House of Lords

I can only refer the noble Lord to previous comments that the details around these matters will be considered when progress is made. It is not appropriate for those matters of detail to be considered now. The noble Lord is shaking his head, but I think we are very clear...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 c556
House
House of Lords

I completely recognise the noble Lord’s strength of feeling, which he has expressed on many occasions. However, I just reaffirm that we would go through a process for determining the mechanism around the matters that he raises should the Bill progress, and that is a clear point from the Government...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 c591
House
House of Lords

As always, my noble friend raises an important point. I will go on to talk about the whole issue of substances, so if I do not address the points he raised, I will be happy to speak or write to him afterwards to make sure that he has had the...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 c560
House
House of Lords

I just reinforce to the noble Lord that it would be completely wrong to pre-empt the decisions of Parliament—I am sure he is fully aware of that. I just want to give reassurance that, across all these issues, evidence would be considered in the usual way in considering the substances...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 cc560-592
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this very important debate. As usual, I will limit my comments to amendments on which the Government have major legal, technical or operational workability concerns.

To begin, key concepts in Amendment 149, moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Grey-Thompson, are...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 cc643-4
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his comments. It is still worth raising these matters in this context to avoid any confusion.

Amendment 162, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Shinkwin, would mean that a registered medical practitioner could not raise assisted dying with any person with a learning disability, including...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2026
Reference
854 cc644-5
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their thoughtful comments, particularly those on the amendments proposing an assisted dying help service and a minimum timeline for the assisted dying process. I thank the noble Lords, Lord Birt and Lord Mackinlay, and the noble Baroness, Lady Coffey, for their amendments in this group.

I...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2026
Reference
852 cc559-560
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was just about to go on to the whole issue of funding, which many noble Lords have raised throughout this morning’s debate. The Government’s position is absolutely clear on this. Should Parliament pass the Bill, the Government would work to undertake development of the delivery model. Until...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2026
Reference
852 c560
House
House of Lords