1-4 of 4 results for subject:Marriage
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.174 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Marriage
- We searched for
- subject_t:Marriage OR subject_t:"Arranged marriage" OR subject_t:"Equal marriage" OR subject_t:"Gay marriage" OR subject_t:"Marriage and civil partnerships" OR subject_t:"Mixed marriage" OR subject_ses:91939
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities (1) what recent representations she has received on the adequacy of her proposed protections aimed at ensuring that churches and clergy who do not wish to carry out same sex marriage ceremonies are not compelled to do so;
[142402]
To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities (1) what recent representations she has received on the adequacy of her proposed protections aimed at ensuring that churches and clergy who do not wish to carry out same sex marriage ceremonies are not compelled to do so;
[142402]
[holding answer 11 February 2013]: We have always been clear that no religious organisation or individual minister will be forced to marry same sex couples. The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, which had its Second Reading on 5 February, contains a quadruple lock of religious protections which deliver on this commitment. We have had detailed discussions with a wide range of religious organisations, including the Church of England, as we developed the Bill, and we are confident the religious protections are robust and effective. The Church of England has said:
“If the Bill proceeds into law it is essential that the various ‘locks’ in the Bill are preserved as drafted.”
When the Bill is in force, people will continue to be able to express their perfectly lawful views that marriage should be between a man and a woman, in the same
way as they already express views about a whole range of issues—such as that civil partnerships are contrary to religious teaching, or that people should not have children outside marriage. Same-sex marriage will not be treated any differently.
(2) what discussions she has had with representatives of the churches and clergy regarding protections for (a) churches and clergy who do not wish to carry out same sex marriage ceremonies and (b) workers who have a conscientious objection to measures contained on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill;
[142403]
Mr Anderson:
(2) what discussions she has had with representatives of the churches and clergy regarding protections for (a) churches and clergy who do not wish to carry out same sex marriage ceremonies and (b) workers who have a conscientious objection to measures contained on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill;
[142403]
Mr Anderson:
[holding answer 11 February 2013]: We have always been clear that no religious organisation or individual minister will be forced to marry same sex couples. The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, which had its Second Reading on 5 February, contains a quadruple lock of religious protections which deliver on this commitment. We have had detailed discussions with a wide range of religious organisations, including the Church of England, as we developed the Bill, and we are confident the religious protections are robust and effective. The Church of England has said:
“If the Bill proceeds into law it is essential that the various ‘locks’ in the Bill are preserved as drafted.”
When the Bill is in force, people will continue to be able to express their perfectly lawful views that marriage should be between a man and a woman, in the same
way as they already express views about a whole range of issues—such as that civil partnerships are contrary to religious teaching, or that people should not have children outside marriage. Same-sex marriage will not be treated any differently.
(3) if she will take steps to put robust measures in place to ensure that churches and clergy who do not wish to carry out same sex marriage ceremonies are not compelled to do so;
[142404]
Mr Anderson:
(3) if she will take steps to put robust measures in place to ensure that churches and clergy who do not wish to carry out same sex marriage ceremonies are not compelled to do so;
[142404]
Mr Anderson:
[holding answer 11 February 2013]: We have always been clear that no religious organisation or individual minister will be forced to marry same sex couples. The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, which had its Second Reading on 5 February, contains a quadruple lock of religious protections which deliver on this commitment. We have had detailed discussions with a wide range of religious organisations, including the Church of England, as we developed the Bill, and we are confident the religious protections are robust and effective. The Church of England has said:
“If the Bill proceeds into law it is essential that the various ‘locks’ in the Bill are preserved as drafted.”
When the Bill is in force, people will continue to be able to express their perfectly lawful views that marriage should be between a man and a woman, in the same
way as they already express views about a whole range of issues—such as that civil partnerships are contrary to religious teaching, or that people should not have children outside marriage. Same-sex marriage will not be treated any differently.
(4) whether, in the light of views expressed by hon. Members in the debate on Second Reading of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, she plans to bring forward further proposals to strengthen protection for churches and clergy who do not wish to carry out same sex marriage ceremonies.
[142405]
Mr Anderson:
(4) whether, in the light of views expressed by hon. Members in the debate on Second Reading of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, she plans to bring forward further proposals to strengthen protection for churches and clergy who do not wish to carry out same sex marriage ceremonies.
[142405]
Mr Anderson:
[holding answer 11 February 2013]: We have always been clear that no religious organisation or individual minister will be forced to marry same sex couples. The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, which had its Second Reading on 5 February, contains a quadruple lock of religious protections which deliver on this commitment. We have had detailed discussions with a wide range of religious organisations, including the Church of England, as we developed the Bill, and we are confident the religious protections are robust and effective. The Church of England has said:
“If the Bill proceeds into law it is essential that the various ‘locks’ in the Bill are preserved as drafted.”
When the Bill is in force, people will continue to be able to express their perfectly lawful views that marriage should be between a man and a woman, in the same
way as they already express views about a whole range of issues—such as that civil partnerships are contrary to religious teaching, or that people should not have children outside marriage. Same-sex marriage will not be treated any differently.