Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for subject:Iran

Primary member X
Anderson of Swansea, Lord

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Anderson of Swansea, Lord (15)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the increasing turbulence in the Middle East—in Lebanon, yes, but also in Sudan, South Sudan and Iran—means many more humanitarian tragedies and many more people who technically qualify as refugees and asylum seekers. Are we prepared for this? What are we doing in consultation with our European allies to prepare for a greater influx of refugees and asylum seekers?

Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2026
Reference
854 c1063
House
House of Lords

My Lords, surely the blunt truth is that in international trade, the dollar rules. American banks will comply, and the US Administration have totally failed to listen to the representations from President Macron, Chancellor Merkel and our own Foreign Secretary. In those circumstances, would not any lawyers, in the Government or otherwise, urge British firms to be ultra-cautious?

Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 May 2018
Reference
791 c679
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Baroness agree that, while the centuries-old legal principles in respect of pre-emptive strikes remain valid, they have been transformed in practice by the speed of warning and response in the nuclear age? Although we, along with much of the security establishment in Israel, may

be highly critical of a possible strike, should we not at least acknowledge the dilemma of the Israeli Government, who are faced with President Ahmadinejad, who has said he intends to destroy Israel and may very well soon have the capability to do just that?

Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 December 2012
Reference
741 c432
House
House of Lords
My Lords, historically, Persia/Iran has a proud record in the field of education and tolerance, even from the time of Cyrus, yet we know that the Baha’i community is prevented from attending universities and, now, apparently even from attending schools. That is contrary to the obligations incurred by the Islamic republic under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and, indeed, under Article 33 of the International Covenant on Economic, Cultural and Social Rights. Whether it be sotto voce or through the United Nations agencies, what are we doing to remind Iran of its international obligations in respect of the Baha’i?
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 January 2009
Reference
706 c1439
House
House of Lords
My Lords, in their region the Iranians are comparatively tolerant of ““people of the book””, be they Jews or Christians. The problem arises with apostates: those who convert to Christianity either in their own country or in the United Kingdom. The issue is therefore to test the genuineness of that conversion, because it is clear that there will be discrimination if converts are forced to return to Iran. Can my noble friend assure the House that those who take the decisions in the tribunals are given sophisticated briefing about the problems that are likely to confront converts if they are forced to return to Iran?
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 June 2008
Reference
702 c363-4
House
House of Lords
My Lords, clearly Iran is the regional superpower after the invasion andcan use that power for good or for ill. Is it the Government’s view that Iran, although there may be short-term temptations, is prepared to see that in the longer term it has in interest in the unity and stability of Iraq? Is it prepared to disaggregate Iraq from the other pressing problems—nuclear, Lebanon and so on—which affect it?
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 June 2007
Reference
692 c1130
House
House of Lords
My Lords, my noble friend will recall that in the 1980s the most effective pressure on the apartheid regime in South Africa was not public sanctions from the United Nations and the European Union but private sanctions, particularly the refusal of the Chase Manhattan Bank to roll over loans for the apartheid regime. Does he think there are parallels here? Is it true that, as reported, the Foreign Office has counselled banks in the United Kingdom and private institutions against further investment in Iran?
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 March 2007
Reference
690 c10
House
House of Lords
My Lords, what is the Government’s assessment on Iran’s progress in the miniaturising technology that is necessary to attach nuclear warheads to these missiles?
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2007
Reference
689 c1600
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it is clear that Iran is playing a negative role, not only in the area mentioned by the noble Lord, Lord Astor, but in other areas—such as encouraging Hezbollah and Hamas. Yet the old Soviet Union played such a negative role in the past, and in response we decided to contain and engage with all the instruments of soft power available to us. Are there not serious lessons to be learned now regarding Iran from that experience, and is it not quite wrong that the US—contrary to our interests and general western interests—refuses to parlay with Iran in areas of important interest worldwide?
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2007
Reference
689 c1356-7
House
House of Lords
My Lords, there must surely be a suspicion that the elites in Iran, with strong popular support, have made a strategic decision that it is in their national interest to acquire a military nuclear capability and that they are prepared to pay a high price for that, including condemnation at the UN, international isolation, sanctions and benefits foregone. Can my noble friend give any evidence to refute that suspicion?
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2006
Reference
683 c1313-4
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the Minister go a little further by quoting the former Foreign Secretary, who said that such a military intervention would be ““inconceivable””? Does she agree that, even at the threat of military action, the people of a very proud nation would be certain to rally around their Government? Perhaps the Government might encourage the United States Government not only to try to use the European Union as a surrogate but also, so far as is possible, to seek dialogue with Iran on the issue.
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 May 2006
Reference
681 c773
House
House of Lords

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on the war against terrorism. (Inc ref to HC 81 2003/04 and Cm 6162).

Lead member
Lord Anderson of Swansea
Answering member
Andrew Mackinlay
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
20 May 2004
Reference
421 c311-54WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on foreign policy and terrorism.(Inc ref to HC 384 and Cm 5589)

Lead member
Lord Anderson of Swansea
Answering member
Mike O'Brien
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
31 October 2002
Reference
391 c323-66WH, (corrigendum) 392 c70-2WH;391 c323-66WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on British-US Relations (Includes reference HC 327 2001/02 and Cm 5372)

Lead member
Lord Anderson of Swansea
Answering member
Denis MacShane
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
25 April 2002
Reference
384 c137-77WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, when he expects diplomatic representation with Iran to be raised to the level of ambassador.

Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 1999
Reference
82216; 330 c93W
House
House of Commons