Skip to main content

1-6 of 6 results for subject:Misconduct

Primary member X
Austin, John

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Austin, John (6)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

National Health Service (Amendment) Bill. Committee stage. Clauses 1 to 14 and schedule agreed to. Bill reported without amendment. Report stage (formal). Third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Passed.

Lead member
John Austin
Answering member
John Bowis
Department
Department of Health
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
21 April 1995
Reference
258 c479-84
House
House of Commons

If she will review the procedures for suspension of general practitioners from the provision of NHS services in the light of the recent case raised with her by the honourable Member for Woolwich; on what date she became aware of the Medical Service Committee hearing of the Greenwich and Bexley...

Asked by
John Austin (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 1994
Reference
236 c111-2W
House
House of Commons

What consideration she has given to the need for legislation to provide for the suspension of general practitioners from the provision of NHS services.

Asked by
John Austin (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 1993
Reference
230 c770W
House
House of Commons

What assessment she has made of the speed in dealing with cases of charges of serious professional misconduct at the NHS Tribunal and on appeal; and to comment in relation to a recent case raised with her by the honourable Member for Woolwich.

Asked by
John Austin (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 1993
Reference
230 c770W
House
House of Commons

In what circumstances it is possible for a general practitioner to continue to provide NHS services after a direction has been made by the General Medical Council that his or her name be erased from the Register.

Asked by
John Austin (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 1993
Reference
230 c769-70W
House
House of Commons

In what circumstances under which a general practitioner found guilty of serious professional misconduct by the General Medical Council can be allowed to continue to practise; and what assessment DH has made of whether patients are sufficiently protected.

Asked by
John Austin (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 1993
Reference
230 c769W
House
House of Commons