Skip to main content

1-3 of 3 results for subject:"Rural development programme"

Primary member X
Caithness, Earl of

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Caithness, Earl of (3)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Why it costs 150 per cent more to administer grants under the England Rural Development Programme than it does for agricultural grants and subsidies. [HL 5637]. - Inc figures.

Asked by
Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2002
Reference
638 c135-6WA; HL 5637
House
House of Lords

Further to the Written Answers by Lord Whitty on 16 July, 637 c136WA, and 23 July, 638 c51-2WA, whether the cost of administration were made on the same basis, and, if not, why not. [HL 5636].

Asked by
Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2002
Reference
638 c135WA; HL 5636
House
House of Lords

Further to the Written Answers by Lord Whitty on 19 June (636 c89WA) and on 16 July (637 c137WA), whether they will now answer the Question with regard to administrative costs for each £1 of grant aid subsidy made under the environmental programme. [HL 5400].

Asked by
Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 July 2002
Reference
638 c51-2WA; HL 5400
House
House of Lords