1-7 of 7 results for subject:Peers
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.298 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.01 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Peers
- We searched for
- subject_t:Peers OR subject_t:Lords OR subject_t:"Members of the House of Lords" OR subject_ses:92396
Primary member
X
Campbell of Alloway, Lord
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Campbell of Alloway, Lord (7)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
My Lords, does this Question not pre-empt the decision of this House as to whether it will retain an appointed Chamber? Is it really possible to consider this, which is a matter of cost, when retention of the Chamber as constituted is a matter of quality of advice to the nation?
My Lords, does this Question not pre-empt the decision of this House as to whether it will retain an appointed Chamber? Is it really possible to consider this, which is a matter of cost, when retention of the Chamber as constituted is a matter of quality of advice to the nation?
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
26 October 2010
My Lords, I agree with my noble friend. One of the problems with the persistence of the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, in putting these Questions on the Order Paper, is that much of this is idle speculation by him. We will soon have the Bill and then we can have a proper debate.
Subjects
Costs; Elections; House of Lords; House of Commons; House of Lords composition; Members; Peers; Reform; House of Commons composition
Date
26 October 2010
Reference
721 c1123
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on whether disclosure of private interests of others in register is compatible with human rights legislation.
1st supplementary on whether disclosure of private interests of others in register is compatible with human rights legislation.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
16 October 2001
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Human rights; Privacy; Peers; Peers' interests
Date
16 October 2001
Reference
627 c471-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether Lords of Appeal will be invited to attend the sub-committee convened to advise the registrar on registration of Lords' interests; whether a Lord of Appeal will preside; whether the decision of the registrar is subject to review by the courts and the European court of Human Rights on compatability with Articles 8 and 10 of the convention, and if so whether the sub-committee may receive representations by counsel and regulate its own procedures.
Whether Lords of Appeal will be invited to attend the sub-committee convened to advise the registrar on registration of Lords' interests; whether a Lord of Appeal will preside; whether the decision of the registrar is subject to review by the courts and the European court of Human Rights on compatability with Articles 8 and 10 of the convention, and if so whether the sub-committee may receive representations by counsel and regulate its own procedures.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Williams of Mostyn
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
16 October 2001
Answered on
16 October 2001
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Human rights; Privacy; Peers; Peers' interests
Date
16 October 2001
Reference
627 c471-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on whether such entries are incompatible with convention right of respect for private and family life.
1st supplementary on whether such entries are incompatible with convention right of respect for private and family life.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
17 July 2001
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Human rights; Privacy; Peers; Peers' interests
Date
17 July 2001
Reference
626 c1377-8
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether the Register of Interests now to be prepared is to be made available for public comment; and whether entries relating to spouses, relatives or friends are to be made without written consent of those concerned.
Whether the Register of Interests now to be prepared is to be made available for public comment; and whether entries relating to spouses, relatives or friends are to be made without written consent of those concerned.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Williams of Mostyn
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
17 July 2001
Answered on
17 July 2001
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Human rights; Privacy; Peers; Peers' interests
Date
17 July 2001
Reference
626 c1377-8
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether they consider that it is in accordance with the status of this House that members of the public should be invited to propose themselves for membership.
Whether they consider that it is in accordance with the status of this House that members of the public should be invited to propose themselves for membership.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Jay of Paddington
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
4 October 2000
Answered on
4 October 2000
Subjects
House of Lords composition; Public appointments; Peers; Reform; Crossbenchers
Date
4 October 2000
Reference
616 C1511-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on the same.
1st supplementary on the same.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
4 October 2000
Subjects
House of Lords composition; Public appointments; Peers; Reform; Crossbenchers
Date
4 October 2000
Reference
616 C1511-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords