1-14 of 14 results for subject:Powers
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.244 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Powers
- We searched for
- subject_t:Powers OR subject_ses:92530
Primary member
X
Campbell of Alloway, Lord
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Campbell of Alloway, Lord (14)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Baroness for her exposition of the true position in this country under the decisions of the Strasbourg court. We retain in our Supreme Court the right to make our own decisions, a matter that was not referred to in yesterday’s debate.
My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Baroness for her exposition of the true position in this country under the decisions of the Strasbourg court. We retain in our Supreme Court the right to make our own decisions, a matter that was not referred to in yesterday’s debate.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
26 January 2010
My Lords, the noble Lord is absolutely right. The Supreme Court retains the right and the duty to express itself on our law. It has done so cogently and well. Of course it is similarly the right of the European Court of Human Rights to express what it thinks the position is and the Grand Chamber usually has the final say.
Legislation
Terrorism Act 2000
Subjects
Judgements; European Court of Human Rights; Police; Powers; Terrorism; Stop and search
Date
26 January 2010
Reference
716 c1299
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is the noble and learned Lord aware that he has not answered the question of my noble friend? He has not said why the Government—of which, I assume, he is a part—are seeking these suggestions and just leaving it to a committee to consider. Why do the Government make these suggestions?
My Lords, is the noble and learned Lord aware that he has not answered the question of my noble friend? He has not said why the Government—of which, I assume, he is a part—are seeking these suggestions and just leaving it to a committee to consider. Why do the Government make these suggestions?
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
14 June 2006
My Lords, we have made it absolutely clear why we have made the 60-day proposal. Noble Lords will recall the remark made in this place by the Leader of the Opposition, the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde, on other proposals that had been made, that, if we moved forward with a particular Bill, it would lead to the disruption of other Bills. Noble Lords will also remember the Animal Welfare Bill, which was subject to a dilatory Motion. It happens very rarely, but it is with that sort of issue that the 60-day proposal is designed to deal.
Subjects
House of Lords; Powers
Date
14 June 2006
Reference
683 c204
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the advice and guidance given to the Director of Army Legal Services and the Army Prosecuting Authority by the Attorney-General under his supervisory function. Motion withdrawn.
Lords debate on motion to call attention to the advice and guidance given to the Director of Army Legal Services and the Army Prosecuting Authority by the Attorney-General under his supervisory function. Motion withdrawn.
Lead member
Lord Campbell of Alloway
Answering member
Lord Goldsmith
Department
Attorney General
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Subjects
Criminal investigation; Detainees; Armed forces; Attorney General; Courts martial; Evidence; Jurisdiction; Homicide; Iraq; Inhuman treatment; Powers; Prosecutions; Peacekeeping operations; Military police; Military law; Standards; Trials; Army Prosecuting Authority; High Court; Williams, Kevin; Evans, Scott
Date
16 February 2006
Reference
678 c1264-99
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
In connection with the proposed Joint Committee on the Conventions of the House of Lords: (a) who will propose the terms of reference; and (b) whether these will extend to the powers and membership of the House.
In connection with the proposed Joint Committee on the Conventions of the House of Lords: (a) who will propose the terms of reference; and (b) whether these will extend to the powers and membership of the House.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Answered on
9 June 2005
The terms of reference for Joint Committees are normally proposed by the Government and discussed through the usual channels in both Houses, before being put first to one House and then to the other for agreement. I would expect this procedure to apply in the case of the proposed Joint Committee referred to.
Subjects
House of Lords; House of Lords composition; Powers; Parliamentary procedure; Joint select committees
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
294; 672 c95WA
House
House of Lords
Whether, in the light of the terrorist threat, they have any plans to suspend the United Kingdom's obligations relating to asylum and the European Convention on Human Rights and to introduce general measures of safeguard.
Whether, in the light of the terrorist threat, they have any plans to suspend the United Kingdom's obligations relating to asylum and the European Convention on Human Rights and to introduce general measures of safeguard.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Filkin
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
12 February 2003
Answered on
12 February 2003
Subjects
Asylum; Detainees; European Convention on Human Rights; National security; Powers; Terrorism
Date
12 February 2003
Reference
644 c665-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on same.
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
12 February 2003
Subjects
Asylum; Detainees; European Convention on Human Rights; National security; Powers; Terrorism
Date
12 February 2003
Reference
644 c665-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether they have any proposals to review the Salisbury Convention in advance of any response to the report of the Royal Commission on Reform of the House of Lords.
Whether they have any proposals to review the Salisbury Convention in advance of any response to the report of the Royal Commission on Reform of the House of Lords.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Jay of Paddington
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
7 February 2000
Answered on
7 February 2000
Subjects
Committees; British constitution; House of Lords; Powers; Parliamentary procedure; Reform; Reform of the House of Lords Royal Commission; Upper houses; Salisbury convention
Date
7 February 2000
Reference
609 c392
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on the Salisbury Convention needing review and being referred to committee.
1st supplementary on the Salisbury Convention needing review and being referred to committee.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
7 February 2000
Subjects
Committees; British constitution; House of Lords; Powers; Parliamentary procedure; Reform; Reform of the House of Lords Royal Commission; Government responses; Upper houses; Salisbury convention
Date
7 February 2000
Reference
609 c392
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether they favour retention of the Salisbury convention when Her Majesty's Opposition have no voting majority in either House of Parliament.
Whether they favour retention of the Salisbury convention when Her Majesty's Opposition have no voting majority in either House of Parliament.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Jay of Paddington
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
15 December 1999
Answered on
15 December 1999
Subjects
British constitution; House of Lords; House of Commons; Government; Powers; Parliamentary procedure; Reform; Upper houses; Salisbury convention; Minority governments
Date
15 December 1999
Reference
608 c214-5
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on circumstances under which Salisbury convention was introduced and on the possibility of re-examining the convention.
1st supplementary on circumstances under which Salisbury convention was introduced and on the possibility of re-examining the convention.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
15 December 1999
Subjects
British constitution; House of Lords; House of Commons; Government; Powers; Parliamentary procedure; Reform; Upper houses; Salisbury convention; Minority governments
Date
15 December 1999
Reference
608 c214-5
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on whether the House of Lords has abrogated its right to reject secondary legislation and for the House of Lords to consider the issue.
1st supplementary on whether the House of Lords has abrogated its right to reject secondary legislation and for the House of Lords to consider the issue.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
29 November 1999
Subjects
Delegated legislation; Legislative process; House of Lords; Legislation; Powers; Parliamentary procedure; Statutory instruments
Date
29 November 1999
Reference
607 c655-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether they acknowledge the right of this House to amend, or to reject, secondary legislation.
Whether they acknowledge the right of this House to amend, or to reject, secondary legislation.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
29 November 1999
Answered on
29 November 1999
Subjects
Delegated legislation; Legislative process; House of Lords; Legislation; Powers; Parliamentary procedure; Statutory instruments
Date
29 November 1999
Reference
607 c655-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether, after the end of the current Session, the Salisbury convention and the convention that this House should not amend or reject secondary legislation will continue to apply. [HL 4490].
Whether, after the end of the current Session, the Salisbury convention and the convention that this House should not amend or reject secondary legislation will continue to apply. [HL 4490].
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Jay of Paddington
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
3 November 1999
Answered on
3 November 1999
Subjects
British constitution; House of Lords; Powers; Parliamentary procedure; Parliamentary session; Reform; Upper houses; Salisbury convention
Date
3 November 1999
Reference
606 c95-6WA; HL 4490
House
House of Lords
Lords statement on changes to operation of extended fixed penalty system. - Includes figures.
Lords statement on changes to operation of extended fixed penalty system. - Includes figures.
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway
(Conservative)
Answered by
Earl Ferrers
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
20 December 1989
Answered on
20 December 1989
Subjects
Fixed penalties; Fines; Police; Powers; Parking offences; Parking attendants; Road traffic offences
Date
20 December 1989
Reference
514 c330-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords