1-6 of 6 results for subject:Media
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.532 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Media
- We searched for
- subject_t:Media OR subject_t:"Mass media" OR subject_ses:91946
Primary member
X
Campbell-Savours, Lord
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (6)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Lords motion to take note of the remit of, and arrangements for the handling of evidence by, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. Agreed to on question.
Lords motion to take note of the remit of, and arrangements for the handling of evidence by, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. Agreed to on question.
Lead member
Lord Campbell-Savours
Answering member
Baroness Barran
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates
Legislation
Inquiries Act 2005
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Criminal investigation; Criminal injuries compensation; Evidence; Police; Media; Offences against children; Victims; Rights of accused; Perjury; Janner of Braunstone, Lord; Heath, Edward; Child Sexual Abuse Independent Panel Inquiry
Date
20 December 2018
Reference
794 cc1972-1997
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, before alarm bells ring in the ear of my noble friend on the prospect of Al-Jazeera having an interest in taking over ITV, will he bear it in mind that Al-Jazeera was the only thoroughly objective news-gathering service during the course of the recent dispute in Gaza?
My Lords, before alarm bells ring in the ear of my noble friend on the prospect of Al-Jazeera having an interest in taking over ITV, will he bear it in mind that Al-Jazeera was the only thoroughly objective news-gathering service during the course of the recent dispute in Gaza?
Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours
(Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
2 March 2009
My Lords, I described the possibility as exotic, not objectionable. I hear what my noble friend says and will take that into account should any eventuality arise concerning that broadcasting organisation in the future.
Subjects
Companies; Ownership; Mergers; Media; Ofcom; Sales
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
708 c503
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, my noble and learned friend has actually admitted—accepted—that there is an inconsistency in the way in which these matters are dealt with in the courts, which led to the naming in Parliament in that case. If he accepts that there is an inconsistency, is he prepared to raise within the Government the whole question of bringing to the House new legislation to deal with this inconsistency which Judge Hallett objected to when she was dealing with the Warren Blackwell conviction?
My Lords, my noble and learned friend has actually admitted—accepted—that there is an inconsistency in the way in which these matters are dealt with in the courts, which led to the naming in Parliament in that case. If he accepts that there is an inconsistency, is he prepared to raise within the Government the whole question of bringing to the House new legislation to deal with this inconsistency which Judge Hallett objected to when she was dealing with the Warren Blackwell conviction?
Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours
(Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
20 November 2006
My Lords, the noble Lord has raised the point—it is there for all to see, including other members of the Government. I am sure that it will be considered by them.
Subjects
Media; Parliamentary privilege; Parliamentary reporting
Date
20 November 2006
Reference
687 c111
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, why should the trial judge in the original case where there is a conviction for rape have the right to remove anonymity whereas the judge in the Court of Appeal, where the case may be referred by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, does not have that right? That happened in the Warren Blackwell case and indeed the judge protested during proceedings that she did not have the right to name Shannon Taylor. Why should there not be consistency in the two different legal proceedings?
My Lords, why should the trial judge in the original case where there is a conviction for rape have the right to remove anonymity whereas the judge in the Court of Appeal, where the case may be referred by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, does not have that right? That happened in the Warren Blackwell case and indeed the judge protested during proceedings that she did not have the right to name Shannon Taylor. Why should there not be consistency in the two different legal proceedings?
Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours
(Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
20 November 2006
My Lords, my noble friend draws attention to the terms of the statute passed by Parliament: the trial court and the Court of Appeal both have the ability to remove anonymity if they regard it as necessary to induce the bringing forward of evidence; and the trial judge, though not the Court of Appeal, has the ability to remove the reporting restriction if it is in the public interest to do so—but not just because there is an acquittal. Why Parliament did not apply the same rules to the Court of Appeal, I cannot say.
Subjects
Media; Parliamentary privilege; Parliamentary reporting
Date
20 November 2006
Reference
687 c110
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
If he will assess the advantages of allowing live media use of Westminster Hall.
If he will assess the advantages of allowing live media use of Westminster Hall.
Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Martin of Springburn
(Labour)
Answering body
Administration Select Committee
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
12 February 1996
Answered on
12 February 1996
Subjects
Media; Westminster Hall
Date
12 February 1996
Reference
13054; 271 c428W
House
House of Commons
What representations have been made to the German authorities in respect of denying access by the media to Mr Nick Leeson. - None. German authorities have not denied access to Mr Leeson by media. Access is a matter for Mr Leeson, his lawyer and Germany police authorities.
What representations have been made to the German authorities in respect of denying access by the media to Mr Nick Leeson. - None. German authorities have not denied access to Mr Leeson by media. Access is a matter for Mr Leeson, his lawyer and Germany police authorities.
Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours
(Labour)
Answered by
Tony Baldry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
8 March 1995
Answered on
8 March 1995
Subjects
Insolvency; Germany; Prisoners; Prisons; Media; Barings; Visits; Leeson, Nick
Date
8 March 1995
Reference
256 c199W
House
House of Commons