1-5 of 5 results for subject:Email
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.227 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Email
- We searched for
- subject_t:Email OR subject_t:"Electronic mail" OR subject_t:Spam OR subject_ses:91099
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, (a) what representations she has received and (b) what assessment she has made of the security of magistrates' new e-mail addresses.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, (a) what representations she has received and (b) what assessment she has made of the security of magistrates' new e-mail addresses.
The Secretary of State for Justice has not received any representations concerning magistrates’ new e-mail addresses.
The Judiciary worked with the Ministry of Justice Information Assurance team and an Independent CLAS (CESG Listed Advisor Scheme) consultant to produce a technical risk assessment and achieve security accreditation for the service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 6 May 2012, Official Report, column 179W, on prisoners: email, how many contacts were made in each prison in each of the last three years.
[114790]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 6 May 2012, Official Report, column 179W, on prisoners: email, how many contacts were made in each prison in each of the last three years.
[114790]
I believe the hon. Member is referring to my response of 16 May 2012, Official Report, column 179W, rather than 6 May. As I stated in that response it is not possible to provide the number of contacts each prisoner has received through the Emailaprisoner.com scheme as such information is not held centrally. To provide such information would require the collection of data from each prison and this could be achieved only at disproportionate cost.
(2) what guidance he issues on the monitoring of postal and e-mail correspondence to prisoners; and if he will place a copy of any such guidance in the Library.
[107196]
Philip Davies:
(2) what guidance he issues on the monitoring of postal and e-mail correspondence to prisoners; and if he will place a copy of any such guidance in the Library.
[107196]
Philip Davies:
As stated in my response of 30 April 2012, Official Report, columns 1164-67W, it is not possible to provide the number of contacts each prisoner has received through the scheme as such information is not held centrally. To provide such information would require the collection of data from each prison and this could be achieved only at disproportionate cost.
The guidance on the monitoring of communications in prisons is set out in the National Security Framework (NSF). This is Prison Service Order 1000. The NSF,
which is on a website for prison staff only, sets out the priorities for prison staff on a risk based strategy. This means that category A prisoners, prisoners subject to public protection measures, such as sex offenders, and prisoners believed to be engaged in criminal activities will be subject to communications monitoring, which will include telephone calls and written correspondence including letters sent via Emailaprisoner.com. Prison Service Instruction 49 of 2011 gives further guidance to governors in relation to the level of random monitoring of prisoner communications. A copy of the instruction is in the Library of the House.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) with reference to the answer of 30 April 2012, Official Report, columns 1164-7W, on prisoners: e-mail, how many contacts were made through the e-mail a prisoner scheme, by prison, in each of the last three years;
[107195]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) with reference to the answer of 30 April 2012, Official Report, columns 1164-7W, on prisoners: e-mail, how many contacts were made through the e-mail a prisoner scheme, by prison, in each of the last three years;
[107195]
As stated in my response of 30 April 2012, Official Report, columns 1164-67W, it is not possible to provide the number of contacts each prisoner has received through the scheme as such information is not held centrally. To provide such information would require the collection of data from each prison and this could be achieved only at disproportionate cost.
The guidance on the monitoring of communications in prisons is set out in the National Security Framework (NSF). This is Prison Service Order 1000. The NSF,
which is on a website for prison staff only, sets out the priorities for prison staff on a risk based strategy. This means that category A prisoners, prisoners subject to public protection measures, such as sex offenders, and prisoners believed to be engaged in criminal activities will be subject to communications monitoring, which will include telephone calls and written correspondence including letters sent via Emailaprisoner.com. Prison Service Instruction 49 of 2011 gives further guidance to governors in relation to the level of random monitoring of prisoner communications. A copy of the instruction is in the Library of the House.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice which prisons participate in the email a prisoner scheme; what checks are in place at such prisons to monitor such emails; and what estimate he has made of the number of contacts through the scheme each prisoner has had in each of...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice which prisons participate in the email a prisoner scheme; what checks are in place at such prisons to monitor such emails; and what estimate he has made of the number of contacts through the scheme each prisoner has had in each of...