1-1 of 1 results for subject:Injunctions
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.181 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Injunctions
- We searched for
- subject_t:Injunctions OR subject_ses:91670
Primary member
X
Falconer of Thoroton, Lord
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Falconer of Thoroton, Lord (1)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
I agree with that and the extent to which one should not use privilege to go against the terms of court orders. To what extent are the Government considering how much the hearings in which super-injunctions or indeed any privacy injunctions are granted are open to the press? One of the problems is that people do not know what the process is. The press are reliable when directed not to disclose what goes on in criminal trials. Why can they not be present when secrecy injunctions or super-injunctions are granted?
I agree with that and the extent to which one should not use privilege to go against the terms of court orders. To what extent are the Government considering how much the hearings in which super-injunctions or indeed any privacy injunctions are granted are open to the press? One of the problems is that people do not know what the process is. The press are reliable when directed not to disclose what goes on in criminal trials. Why can they not be present when secrecy injunctions or super-injunctions are granted?
Asked by
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
(Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
19 May 2011
That is an extremely interesting question, one I hope that the Master of the Rolls has been considering and one to which he will give the answer tomorrow—I think.
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Injunctions; Public interest; Privacy
Date
19 May 2011
Reference
727 c1490
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords