1-20 of 68 results for member:"Lord Coaker"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.281 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- member:"Lord Coaker"
- We searched for
- member_ses:299790
Type
+
Parliamentary committees (8)
+
Committee proceedings (8)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (8)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (8)
+
Debates (8)
+
Committee proceedings (8)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (8)
+
Legislative debates (8)
-
Debates on bills (8)
+
Parliamentary questions (60)
-
Written questions (60)
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Featherstone, Baroness (68)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
House of Commons (68)
Committee stage eighteenth sitting (afternoon). Clauses 88 to 101 agreed to, some with amendments. Schedules 7 and 8 agreed to, both with amendments. Clauses 102 and 103 agreed to. Committee adjourned.
Committee stage eighteenth sitting (afternoon). Clauses 88 to 101 agreed to, some with amendments. Schedules 7 and 8 agreed to, both with amendments. Clauses 102 and 103 agreed to. Committee adjourned.
Lead member
James Brokenshire; Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Criminal records; Civil partnerships; Biometrics; Convictions; Fraud; Finance; Fees and charges; Juries; Freedom of information; Marriage; Personal records; Northern Ireland; Public appointments; Vetting; Trials; Information Commissioner's Office
Date
12 May 2011
Reference
PBC
Chamber / Committee
General committees
House
House of Commons
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage seventeenth Sitting (Morning). Written evidence reported to the House. Clauses 82 to 87 agreed to. Clause 88 under consideration.
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage seventeenth Sitting (Morning). Written evidence reported to the House. Clauses 82 to 87 agreed to. Clause 88 under consideration.
Lead member
James Brokenshire; Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Subjects
Children; Disclosure of information; Criminal records; Convictions; Freedom of information; Homosexuality; Personal records; Protection; Vetting; Vulnerable adults
Date
12 May 2011
Reference
PBC
Chamber / Committee
General committees
House
House of Commons
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage sixteenth sitting (afternoon). Clauses 71 to 81 agreed to, some with amendments.
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage sixteenth sitting (afternoon). Clauses 71 to 81 agreed to, some with amendments.
Lead member
Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Subjects
Children; Disclosure of information; Freedom of information; Personal records; Northern Ireland; Protection; Scotland; Registration; Vetting; Vulnerable adults; Criminal Records Bureau
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
PBC
Chamber / Committee
General committees
House
House of Commons
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage fifteenth sitting (morning). Written evidence reported to the House, Clauses 64 to 70 agreed to, some with amendments. Clause 71, as amended, under consideration.
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage fifteenth sitting (morning). Written evidence reported to the House, Clauses 64 to 70 agreed to, some with amendments. Clause 71, as amended, under consideration.
Lead member
Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Subjects
Children; Disclosure of information; Freedom of information; Personal records; Protection; Vetting; Vulnerable adults; Social services; Independent Safeguarding Authority
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
PBC
Chamber / Committee
General committees
House
House of Commons
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage fourteenth sitting (afternoon). Clause 60, as amended, agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clauses 61 and 62 agreed to, one with amendments. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clause 63, as amended, agreed to.
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage fourteenth sitting (afternoon). Clause 60, as amended, agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clauses 61 and 62 agreed to, one with amendments. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clause 63, as amended, agreed to.
Lead member
James Brokenshire; Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Subjects
Children; Counter-terrorism; Codes of practice; Human rights; Northern Ireland; Protection; Vetting; Schools; Stop and search; Vulnerable adults; Teachers; Social services
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
PBC
Chamber / Committee
General committees
House
House of Commons
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage fourth sitting (afternoon). Examination of witnesses.
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage fourth sitting (afternoon). Examination of witnesses.
Lead member
James Brokenshire; Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Witnesses
Local Government Association; Scout Association; Security Industry Authority; NSPCC; Royal Automobile Club; Automobile Association; British Parking Association; Interim CCTV Regulator; Birmingham against Spy Cameras
Subjects
Children; Disclosure of information; Codes of practice; CCTV; Biometrics; Crime prevention; Crime; Immobilisation of vehicles; Parking; Powers of entry; Personal records; Vetting; Vulnerable adults; Surveillance
Date
24 March 2011
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage third sitting (morning). Written evidence reported to the House. Examination of witnesses.
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage third sitting (morning). Written evidence reported to the House. Examination of witnesses.
Lead member
James Brokenshire; Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Witnesses
Information Commissioner's Office; Campaign for Freedom of Information
Subjects
Data protection; Criminal records; CCTV; Biometrics; Crime prevention; Crime; Software; Airports; Freedom of information; Homosexuality; Fingerprints; Personal records; Public sector; Scotland; Vetting; Schools; Vulnerable adults; Surveillance; Young people; Technology; Royal family; Criminal Records Bureau
Date
24 March 2011
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage second sitting (afternoon). Examination of witnesses.
Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage second sitting (afternoon). Examination of witnesses.
Lead member
James Brokenshire; Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Witnesses
Law Society; Independent Safeguarding Authority; JUSTICE; Independent Advisor for Criminality Information Management; Liberty; Criminal Bar Association; GeneWatch UK; Action on Rights for Children
Subjects
Children; Data protection; Counter-terrorism; Codes of practice; CCTV; Biometrics; Crime prevention; Crime; Freedom of information; Fingerprints; Powers of entry; Personal records; Public appointments; Terrorism; Schools; Vulnerable adults; Criminal Records Bureau; Independent Safeguarding Authority
Date
22 March 2011
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what proportion of students in each London borough achieved five or more grades at A* to C at GCSE or equivalent in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what proportion of students in each London borough achieved five or more grades at A* to C at GCSE or equivalent in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
23 February 2010
For answer on
25 February 2010
Answered on
6 April 2010
The information requested can be found in the following Statistical First Release (SFR) (table 17):"http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000909/index.shtml"
Subjects
Greater London; GCSE
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
508 c1349W; 319062
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the ratio of pupils to teachers in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in each London borough has been in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the ratio of pupils to teachers in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in each London borough has been in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
23 February 2010
For answer on
25 February 2010
Answered on
10 March 2010
The information requested for January 2009 is published in table 27 of the Statistical First Release (SFR) "School Workforce In England (including local authority level figures) January 2009 (Revised)" published on 29 September 2009. The SFR is available at the following web link:"http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000874/Tables19to27v2.xls"The information requested for January 2008 is published in table 27 of Statistical First Release (SFR) "School Workforce in England (including local authority level figures), January 2008 (Revised)" published on 25 September 2008. The SFR is available at the following web link:"http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000813/SFR262008_Tables_LA20081021-2.xls"The information requested for January 2007 is published in table 25 of Statistical First Release (SFR) "School Workforce in England (including pupil: teacher ratios and pupil: adult ratios), January 2007 (Revised)" published on 27 September 2007. The SFR is available at the following web link:"http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000743/SFR29_2007_FinalTables18-25.xls"The information requested for January 2006 is published in table 25 of Statistical First Release (SFR) "School Workforce in England (including pupil: teacher ratios and pupil: adult ratios), January 2006 (Revised)" published on 28 September 2006. The SFR is available at the following web link:"http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000681/addition2v2.xls"The information requested for January 2005 is published in table 21 of Statistical First Release (SFR) "School Workforce in England (including pupil: teacher ratios and Pupil: adult ratios), January 2005 (Revised)" published on 28 September 2005. The SFR is available at the following web link:"http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000603/WebTables15-21v2.xls"
Subjects
Class sizes; Greater London
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
507 c365W; 319064
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in each London borough have received in funding per student in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in each London borough have received in funding per student in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
23 February 2010
For answer on
25 February 2010
Answered on
2 March 2010
Per pupil revenue funding figures for primary school pupils (ages three to 10) for each London borough between 2004-05 and 2005-06 are shown in Table 1. These figures are in real terms and are based on financial years.
Per pupil revenue funding figures for secondary school pupils (ages 11 to 15) for each London borough between 2004-05 and 2005-06 are shown in Table 2. These figures are in real terms and are based on financial years.
The revenue per pupil figures shown in Table 3 are taken from the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG). They are not comparable with those for the years 2004-05 to 2005-06 (in Tables 1 and 2 above) because the introduction of the DSG in 2006-07 fundamentally changed how local authorities are funded.The 2004-05 to 2005-06 figures are based on Education Formula Spending (EFS) which formed the education part of the Local Government Finance Settlement, plus various grants. This was an assessment of what local authorities needed to fund education rather than what they spent. The DSG is based largely on an authority's previous spending. In addition, the DSG has a different coverage to EFS. EFS comprised a schools block and an LEA block (to cover LEA central functions) whereas DSG only covers the school block. LEA block items are still funded through DCLG's Local Government Finance Settlement but education items cannot be separately identified. Consequently, there is a break in the Department's time series as the two sets of data are not comparable.To provide a comparison for 2008-09 DSG, the Department have isolated the schools block equivalent funding in 2005-06 (the baseline); as described above this does not represent the totality of 'education' funding in that year.Per pupil revenue funding figures for pupils (ages 3-15)for each London borough between 2005-06 and 2008-09 are shown in Table 3. As the DSG is a mechanism for distributing funding, a split between primary and secondary schools is not available. These figures are in real terms and are based on financial years.
| Table 1: Real terms revenue funding per pupil—SSA/ EFS plus grants | ||
|---|---|---|
| £ | ||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |
| Camden | 5,860 | 6,100 |
| Greenwich | 5,210 | 5,570 |
| Hackney | 5,970 | 6,380 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 5,700 | 5,940 |
| Islington | 5,760 | 6,120 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 5,910 | 6,090 |
| Lambeth | 5,830 | 6,110 |
| Lewisham | 5,350 | 5,710 |
| Southwark | 5,430 | 5,880 |
| Tower Hamlets | 6,110 | 6,570 |
| Wandsworth | 5,040 | 5,410 |
| Westminster | 5,560 | 5,840 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 4,410 | 4,610 |
| Barnet | 4,200 | 4,520 |
| Bexley | 3,810 | 4,000 |
| Brent | 4,850 | 5,160 |
| Bromley | 3,810 | 4,040 |
| Croydon | 4,140 | 4,350 |
| Ealing | 4,640 | 4,990 |
| Enfield | 4,370 | 4,570 |
| Haringey | 5,100 | 5,340 |
| Harrow | 4,220 | 4,500 |
| Havering | 3,770 | 3,970 |
| Hillingdon | 4,110 | 4,400 |
| Hounslow | 4,540 | 4,850 |
| Kingston upon Thames | 3,840 | 4,140 |
| Merton | 4,220 | 4,510 |
| Newham | 5,030 | 5,310 |
| Redbridge | 4,070 | 4,300 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 3,810 | 4,060 |
| Sutton | 3,910 | 4,100 |
| Waltham Forest | 4,660 | 4,850 |
| Notes: | ||
| 1. Price Base: Real terms at 2008-09 prices, based on GDP deflators as at 9 December 2009. | ||
| 2. Figures reflect relevant sub-blocks of Standard Spending Assessment/Education Formula Spending (EFS) settlements and exclude the pensions transfer to EFS. | ||
| 3. Total funding also includes all revenue grants in DFES Departmental Expenditure Limits relevant to pupils aged three to 10 and exclude Education Maintenance Allowances (EMAs) and grants not allocated at LEA level. For those authorities in receipt of advance of grant under the transitional support arrangements for 2004-05, advance grant funding is included in the year of payment (2004-05). There will be a consequential reduction in DFES grant for these LEAs in future years (either 2006-07 and 2007-08 or 2006-07 to 2008-09, depending on the terms on which the advance was given to the LEA). | ||
| 4. The pupil numbers used to convert £ million figures to £ per pupil are those underlying the EFS settlement calculations. | ||
| 5. Rounding: Figures are rounded to the nearest £10. | ||
| 6. Status: Some of the grant allocations have not been finalised. If these do change, the effect on the funding figures is expected to be minimal. |
| Table 2: Real terms revenue funding per pupil—SSA/EFS plus grants | ||
|---|---|---|
| £ | ||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | |
| Camden | 7,200 | 7,340 |
| Greenwich | 6,600 | 6,970 |
| Hackney | 7,990 | 8,320 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 7,240 | 7,310 |
| Islington | 7,440 | 7,800 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 7,660 | 7,760 |
| Lambeth | 7,920 | 8,180 |
| Lewisham | 7,100 | 7,490 |
| Southwark. | 7,600 | 7,820 |
| Tower Hamlets | 7,600 | 7,930 |
| Wandsworth | 6,600 | 6,850 |
| Westminster | 6,850 | 6,950 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 5,540 | 5,690 |
| Barnet | 5,180 | 5,510 |
| Bexley | 4,800 | 4,960 |
| Brent | 6,220 | 6,510 |
| Bromley | 4,910 | 5,050 |
| Croydon | 5,410 | 5,620 |
| Ealing | 5,950 | 6,280 |
| Enfield | 5,410 | 5,590 |
| Haringey | 6,790 | 6,790 |
| Harrow | 5,300 | 5,480 |
| Havering | 4,850 | 5,020 |
| Hillingdon | 5,120 | 5,420 |
| Hounslow | 5,590 | 5,870 |
| Kingston upon Thames | 4,880 | 5,120 |
| Merton | 5,320 | 5,590 |
| Newham | 6,200 | 6,420 |
| Redbridge | 4,970 | 5,140 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 4,920 | 5,100 |
| Sutton | 4,890 | 5,020 |
| Waltham Forest | 5,960 | 6,130 |
| Notes: | ||
| 1. Price Base: Real terms at 2008-09 prices, based on GDP deflators as at 9 December 2009. | ||
| 2. Figures reflect relevant sub-block-s of Standard Spending Assessment/Education Formula Spending (EFS) settlements and exclude the pensions transfer to EFS. | ||
| 3. Total funding also includes all revenue grants in DFES Departmental Expenditure Limits relevant to pupils aged 3 to 10 and exclude Education Maintenance Allowances (EMAs) and grants not allocated at LEA level. For those authorities in receipt of advance of grant under the transitional support arrangements for 2004-05, advance grant funding is included in the year of payment (2004-05). There will be a consequential reduction in DFES grant for these LEAs in future years (either 2006-07 and 2007-08 or 2006-7 to 2008-9, depending on the terms on which the advance was given to the LEA). | ||
| 4. The pupil numbers used to convert £ million figures to £ per pupil are those underlying the EFS settlement calculations. | ||
| 5. Rounding: Figures are rounded to the nearest £10. | ||
| 6. Status: Some of the grant allocations have not been finalised. If these do change, the effect on the funding figures is expected to be minimal. |
| Table 3: Real terms revenue funding per pupil—DSG plus grants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 (baseline) | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | |
| Camden | 6,570 | 6,690 | 6,900 | 6,910 |
| Greenwich | 5,660 | 5,920 | 6,130 | 6,260 |
| Hackney | 6,510 | 6,910 | 7,070 | 7,250 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 6,050 | 6,330 | 6,540 | 6,490 |
| Islington | 6,140 | 6,430 | 6,700 | 6,660 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 6,420 | 6,480 | 6,610 | 6,530 |
| Lambeth | 6,180 | 6,390 | 6,620 | 6,780 |
| Lewisham | 5,910 | 6,130 | 6,300 | 6,330 |
| Southwark | 5,990 | 6,440 | 6,640 | 6,650 |
| Tower Hamlets | 6,680 | 7,010 | 7,270 | 7,350 |
| Wandsworth | 5,430 | 5,650 | 5,880 | 5,980 |
| Westminster | 5,540 | 6,040 | 6,310 | 6,260 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 4,960 | 4,960 | 5,240 | 5,270 |
| Barnet | 4,810 | 4,980 | 5,130 | 5,200 |
| Bexley | 4,400 | 4,510 | 4,660 | 4,730 |
| Brent | 5,210 | 5,340 | 5,590 | 5,700 |
| Bromley | 4,240 | 4,350 | 4,510 | 4,590 |
| Croydon | 4,480 | 4,650 | 4,850 | 4,910 |
| Ealing | 5,200 | 5,350 | 5,540 | 5,620 |
| Enfield | 4,770 | 4,910 | 5,070 | 5,100 |
| Haringey | 5,560 | 5,640 | 5,850 | 5,940 |
| Harrow | 4,590 | 4,800 | 4,970 | 5,170 |
| Havering | 4,360 | 4,450 | 4,600 | 4,670 |
| Hillingdon | 4,610 | 4,790 | 4,930 | 4,990 |
| Hounslow | 5,010 | 5,180 | 5,340 | 5,380 |
| Kingston upon Thames | 4,560 | 4,670 | 4,790 | 4,850 |
| Merton | 4,550 | 4,810 | 4,960 | 5,010 |
| Newham | 5,360 | 5,640 | 5,870 | 5,970 |
| Redbridge | 4,400 | 4,580 | 4,760 | 4,820 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 4,440 | 4,550 | 4,690 | 4,750 |
| Sutton | 4,490 | 4,590 | 4,740 | 4,810 |
| Waltham Forest | 4,970 | 5,170 | 5,330 | 5,330 |
| Notes: | ||||
| 1. This covers funding through the Dedicated Schools Grant, School Standards Grant, School Standards Grant (Personalisation), and Standards Fund as well as funding from the-Learning and Skills Council; it excludes grants which are not allocated at LA level. | ||||
| 2. Price Base: Real terms at 2008-09 prices, based on GDP deflators as at 9 December 2009. | ||||
| 3. These figures are for all funded pupils aged 3 to 15. | ||||
| 4. Figures have been rounded to the nearest £10. | ||||
| 5. Some of the grant allocations have not been finalised. If these do change, the effect on the funding figures is expected to be minimal. |
Subjects
Greater London; Pupils; Schools; Per capita costs
Date
2 March 2010
Reference
506 c1176-8W;506 c1175-8W; 319063
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the pupil to teacher ratio in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools is in each London borough in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the pupil to teacher ratio in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools is in each London borough in the latest period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 October 2009
For answer on
13 October 2009
Answered on
15 October 2009
The information requested is published in table 27 of the Statistical First Release (SFR) "School Workforce in England (including local authority level figures) January 2009 (Revised)" published on 29 September 2009. The SFR is available at the following web link:"http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000874/Tables19to27_Vals.xls"
Subjects
Class sizes
Date
15 October 2009
Reference
497 c1095W; 293062
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much each London borough has received in capital funding under the Building Schools for the Future programme; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much each London borough has received in capital funding under the Building Schools for the Future programme; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 October 2009
For answer on
13 October 2009
Answered on
14 October 2009
The following table shows the total payments of capital grant made to each London borough as part of the Building Schools for the Future programme to the end of financial year 2008-09.The figures are on cash paid basis during the year, and form part of much larger allocation figures which extend over a period of years. They do not include academies delivered through the National Framework.
| Total capital grant paid to end 2008-09 | |
|---|---|
| Local authority | £ million |
| Greenwich | 28.2 |
| Lewisham | 9.7 |
| Newham | 37.7 |
| Waltham Forest | 28.6 |
| Hackney | 30.2 |
| Haringey | 52.8 |
| Islington | 18.8 |
| Lambeth | 70.7 |
| Tower Hamlets | 13.3 |
| Southwark | 33.8 |
| Westminster | 50.2 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 0.1 |
| Ealing | 0.05 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 0.05 |
| Enfield | 0.05 |
| Total | 374.2 |
Subjects
Greater London; Building schools for the future programme
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c981W; 293045
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the per pupil funding for (a) primary and (b) secondary school children in each London borough was in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the per pupil funding for (a) primary and (b) secondary school children in each London borough was in each of the last five years.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 October 2009
For answer on
13 October 2009
Answered on
14 October 2009
The per pupil revenue funding figures for primary and secondary school pupils for each London local authority in 2004-05 and 2005-06 are as follows. These figures are in real terms:
The revenue per pupil figures shown in the following table are taken from the new Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG). They are not comparable with those for the years 2004-05 to 2005-06 because the introduction of the DSG in 2006-07 fundamentally changed how local authorities are funded.The 2004-05 to 2005-06 figures are based on Education Formula Spending (EFS) which formed the education part of the Local Government Finance Settlement, plus various grants. This was an assessment of what local authorities needed to fund education rather than what they spent. The DSG is based largely on an authority's previous spending. In addition, the DSG has a different coverage to EFS. EFS comprised a schools block and an LEA block (to cover LEA central functions) whereas DSG only covers the school block. LEA block items are still funded through DCLG's Local Government Finance Settlement but education items cannot be separately identified. Consequently, there is a break in the Department's time series as the two sets of data are not comparable.To provide a comparison for 2006-07 DSG, the Department have isolated the schools block equivalent funding in 2005-06; as described above this does not represent the totality of 'education' funding in that year.The per pupil revenue funding figures for years 2005-06 (baseline) to 2008-09 for each London local authority are provided in the following table. As the DSG is a mechanism for distributing funding, a split between primary and secondary schools is not available.The following figures are for all funded pupils aged 3-19 and are in real terms:
| Real terms revenue funding per pupil—EFS plus grants | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | |||||
| 2004-05 | 2005-06 | ||||
| Primary(aged 3-10) | Secondary (aged 11-15) | Primary (aged 3-10) | Secondary (aged 11-15) | ||
| 301 | Barking and Dagenham | 4,480 | 4,390 | 4,690 | 4,580 |
| 302 | Barnet | 4,280 | 4,190 | 4,600 | 4,490 |
| 303 | Bexley | 3,880 | 3,790 | 4,070 | 3,970 |
| 304 | Brent | 4,920 | 4,840 | 5,240 | 5,140 |
| 305 | Bromley | 3,880 | 3,800 | 4,120 | 4,030 |
| 202 | Camden | 5,950 | 5,900 | 6,190 | 6,130 |
| 306 | Croydon | 4,210 | 4,120 | 4,430 | 4,330 |
| 307 | Ealing | 4,720 | 4,630 | 5,070 | 4,960 |
| 308 | Enfield | 4,440 | 4,360 | 4,650 | 4,540 |
| 203 | Greenwich | 5,290 | 5,190 | 5,660 | 5,530 |
| 204 | Hackney | 6,060 | 6,010 | 6,460 | 6,390 |
| 205 | Hammersmith and Fulham | 5,780 | 5,680 | 6,030 | 5,950 |
| 309 | Haringey | 5,170 | 5,070 | 5,410 | 5,320 |
| 310 | Harrow | 4,290 | 4,190 | 4,580 | 4,470 |
| 311 | Havering | 3,840 | 3,750 | 4,050 | 3,950 |
| 312 | Hillingdon | 4,190 | 4,080 | 4,470 | 4,350 |
| 313 | Hounslow | 4,620 | 4,530 | 4,930 | 4,820 |
| 206 | Islington | 5,840 | 5,760 | 6,200 | 6,120 |
| 207 | Kensington and Chelsea | 5,990 | 5,950 | 6,180 | 6,120 |
| 314 | Kingston upon Thames | 3,920 | 3,800 | 4,220 | 4,100 |
| 208 | Lambeth | 5,910 | 5,820 | 6,200 | 6,100 |
| 209 | Lewisham | 5,430 | 5,340 | 5,800 | 5,690 |
| 315 | Merton | 4,290 | 4,190 | 4,590 | 4,470 |
| 316 | Newham | 5,100 | 4,990 | 5,380 | 5,270 |
| 317 | Redbridge | 4,140 | 4,040 | 4,370 | 4,260 |
| 318 | Richmond upon Thames | 3,890 | 3,800 | 4,140 | 4,030 |
| 210 | Southwark | 5,510 | 5,430 | 5,970 | 5,860 |
| 319 | Sutton | 3,990 | 3,870 | 4,180 | 4,050 |
| 211 | Tower Hamlets | 6,200 | 6,080 | 6,650 | 6,520 |
| 320 | Waltham Forest | 4,730 | 4,630 | 4,920 | 4,830 |
| 212 | Wandsworth | 5,120 | 5,070 | 5,490 | 5,420 |
| 213 | Westminster | 5,650 | 5,570 | 5,930 | 5,820 |
| Notes | |||||
| 1. Price Base: Real terms at 2008-09 prices, based on GDP deflators as at 30 June 2009. | |||||
| 2. Figures reflect relevant sub-blocks of Education Formula Spending (EFS) settlements and include the pensions transfer to EFS. | |||||
| 3. Total funding also includes all revenue grants in DFES Departmental Expenditure Limits relevant to pupils aged 3-15 and exclude Education Maintenance Allowances (EMAs) and grants not allocated at LEA level. | |||||
| 4. The pupil numbers used to convert £ million figures to £ per pupil are those underlying the EFS settlement calculations. | |||||
| 5. Rounding: Figures are rounded to the nearest £10. |
| Real terms revenue funding per pupil—DSG plus grants | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £ | |||||
| All pupils aged 3-19 | |||||
| 2005-06 (Baseline) | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | ||
| 301 | Barking and Dagenham | 4,940 | 4,940 | 5,230 | 5,270 |
| 302 | Barnet | 4,790 | 4,960 | 5,120 | 5,200 |
| 303 | Bexley | 4,390 | 4,490 | 4,650 | 4,730 |
| 304 | Brent | 5,190 | 5,320 | 5,570 | 5,700 |
| 305 | Bromley | 4,220 | 4,330 | 4,500 | 4,590 |
| 202 | Camden | 6,550 | 6,670 | 6,880 | 6,910 |
| 306 | Croydon | 4,470 | 4,640 | 4,840 | 4,910 |
| 307 | Ealing | 5,180 | 5,330 | 5,520 | 5,620 |
| 308 | Enfield | 4,750 | 4,890 | 5,060 | 5,100 |
| 203 | Greenwich | 5,640 | 5,900 | 6,110 | 6,260 |
| 204 | Hackney | 6,480 | 6,890 | 7,050 | 7,250 |
| 205 | Hammersmith and Fulham | 6,030 | 6,310 | 6,530 | 6,490 |
| 309 | Haringey | 5,540 | 5,620 | 5,830 | 5,940 |
| 310 | Harrow | 4,570 | 4,780 | 4,950 | 5,170 |
| 311 | Havering | 4,350 | 4,440 | 4,590 | 4,670 |
| 312 | Hillingdon | 4,600 | 4,770 | 4,920 | 4,990 |
| 313 | Hounslow | 4,990 | 5,160 | 5,320 | 5,380 |
| 206 | Islington | 6,110 | 6,410 | 6,690 | 6,660 |
| 207 | Kensington and Chelsea | 6,400 | 6,460 | 6,590 | 6,530 |
| 314 | Kingston upon Thames | 4,540 | 4,650 | 4,780 | 4,850 |
| 208 | Lambeth | 6,160 | 6,370 | 6,600 | 6,780 |
| 209 | Lewisham | 5,890 | 6,110 | 6,290 | 6,330 |
| 315 | Merton | 4,530 | 4,800 | 4,950 | 5,010 |
| 316 | Newham | 5,340 | 5,620 | 5,850 | 5,970 |
| 317 | Redbridge | 4,380 | 4,560 | 4,750 | 4,820 |
| 318 | Richmond upon Thames | 4,420 | 4,540 | 4,670 | 4,750 |
| 210 | Southwark | 5,970 | 6,410 | 6,620 | 6,650 |
| 319 | Sutton | 4,480 | 4,570 | 4,730 | 4,810 |
| 211 | Tower Hamlets | 6,650 | 6,990 | 7,250 | 7,350 |
| 320 | Waltham Forest | 4,950 | 5,160 | 5,320 | 5,330 |
| 212 | Wandsworth | 5,410 | 5,630 | 5,860 | 5,980 |
| 213 | Westminster | 5,520 | 6,010 | 6,290 | 6,260 |
| Notes: | |||||
| 1. This covers funding through the Dedicated Schools Grant, School Standards Grant, School Standards; Grant (Personalisation) and Standards Fund as well as funding from the Learning and Skills Council; it excludes grants which Ere not allocated at LA level. | |||||
| 2. Price Base: Real terms at 2008-09 prices, based on GDP deflators as at 30 June 2009 3. These figures are for all funded pupils aged 3-19 | |||||
| 4. Figures have been rounded to the nearest £10. | |||||
| 5. Some of the grant allocations have not been finalised. If these do change, the effect on the funding figures is expected to be minimal. |
Subjects
Greater London; Pupils; Per capita costs
Date
14 October 2009
Reference
497 c984-8W; 293046
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many SCD5 child abuse investigation trained officers are stationed in (a) each London borough and (b) each police authority area outside London; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many SCD5 child abuse investigation trained officers are stationed in (a) each London borough and (b) each police authority area outside London; and if she will make a statement.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
3 February 2009
For answer on
5 February 2009
Answered on
23 February 2009
The requested figures are not available centrally.
Subjects
Offences against children
Date
23 February 2009
Reference
488 c159W; 254814
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what guidance her Department has issued on whistle blowing policy in relation to individuals working in child protection in police authorities; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what guidance her Department has issued on whistle blowing policy in relation to individuals working in child protection in police authorities; and if she will make a statement.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
12 January 2009
For answer on
14 January 2009
Answered on
20 January 2009
The Home Office does not issue guidance on internal police policy; this is a matter for chief officers and their police authorities.However, the general practice is for police officers working in a multi-agency team who have concerns about work practices or the conduct of colleagues within the team, to raise these concerns through their usual management channels or with their Professional Standards Department, whom they may contact through a confidential line if necessary.If police officers suspect a fellow officer of acting in a way that could result in disciplinary or criminal proceedings, and feels unable to raise these concerns through usual procedures, they may raise their concerns within their force or directly to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, using their dedicated report line.
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Police
Date
20 January 2009
Reference
486 c1242-3W; 247813
House
House of Commons
(2) if her Department will establish a working group with members drawn from non-governmental organisations and women's groups to advise it on policy on women with no recourse to public funds who have experienced domestic violence.
(2) if her Department will establish a working group with members drawn from non-governmental organisations and women's groups to advise it on policy on women with no recourse to public funds who have experienced domestic violence.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
4 July 2008
For answer on
8 July 2008
Answered on
17 July 2008
The development of the new scheme which will provide support to victims of domestic violence who are successful in applying for indefinite leave to remain is currently being negotiated and will be implemented later in the year. The proposals under the new scheme will strengthen the way in which domestic violence cases are considered, enabling those victims who are vulnerable to access additional support. Details of the scheme will be made available shortly.We have established a national stakeholder advisory group on domestic violence which includes representation from organisations supporting women with no recourse to public funds. We will soon also set up a national Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) working group of Government, statutory agencies and third sector organisations that will promote a partnership approach to issues on domestic and sexual violence, forced marriage, so called honour crimes and female genital mutilation. The aim of the group will be to identify and develop actions and practical tools to assist victims and potential victims of these crimes.
Subjects
Domestic abuse; Migrants; Victim support schemes
Date
17 July 2008
Reference
217376; 479 c601-2W;479 c599-600W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when she plans to begin the new scheme targeted at domestic violence victims with no recourse to public funds, which will pay their housing and living costs if they are granted indefinite leave to remain;
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when she plans to begin the new scheme targeted at domestic violence victims with no recourse to public funds, which will pay their housing and living costs if they are granted indefinite leave to remain;
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
4 July 2008
For answer on
8 July 2008
Answered on
17 July 2008
The development of the new scheme which will provide support to victims of domestic violence who are successful in applying for indefinite leave to remain is currently being negotiated and will be implemented later in the year. The proposals under the new scheme will strengthen the way in which domestic violence cases are considered, enabling those victims who are vulnerable to access additional support. Details of the scheme will be made available shortly.We have established a national stakeholder advisory group on domestic violence which includes representation from organisations supporting women with no recourse to public funds. We will soon also set up a national Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) working group of Government, statutory agencies and third sector organisations that will promote a partnership approach to issues on domestic and sexual violence, forced marriage, so called honour crimes and female genital mutilation. The aim of the group will be to identify and develop actions and practical tools to assist victims and potential victims of these crimes.
Subjects
Domestic abuse; Migrants; Victim support schemes
Date
17 July 2008
Reference
217327; 479 c601-2W;479 c599-600W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people aged (a) under 10, (b) 10 to 17, (c) 18 to 20 and (d) 21 years and over were (i) arrested, (ii) charged and (iii) convicted for (A) violent and (B) non-violent offences in each of the...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people aged (a) under 10, (b) 10 to 17, (c) 18 to 20 and (d) 21 years and over were (i) arrested, (ii) charged and (iii) convicted for (A) violent and (B) non-violent offences in each of the...
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
16 June 2008
For answer on
18 June 2008
Answered on
25 June 2008
The number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts for violent and non-violent offences in England and Wales, broken down by age group for the years 2002 to 2006 is shown in the following table.Charging data are not held by the Ministry of Justice. Information on numbers proceeded against has been provided in lieu of charging data.The court proceedings database held by the Ministry of Justice holds information on convictions and prosecutions data for persons aged under 10 who are under the age of liability.These data are on the principal offence basis: the figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offence for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences, the offence selected is the one for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.Court proceedings data for 2007 will be available in the autumn of 2008.The available information held by the Ministry of Justice on number of persons arrested is given in the other table from 2001-02 to 2005-06 (latest available). There is no link from these centrally reported data to any subsequent outcome.
| Number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts, and found guilty at all courts for offences relating to violent, and non-violent offences in England and Wales, by age group, 2002 to 2006¹, ², ³ | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proceeded against | Found guilty | |||||||||
| Age group | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
| 10-17 | ||||||||||
| Violent offences | 20,218 | 18,618 | 18,217 | 18,123 | 18,457 | 10,235 | 9,668 | 10,457 | 11,061 | 11,713 |
| Non-violent offences | 126,350 | 122,172 | 118,445 | 113,608 | 107,732 | 84,311 | 82,873 | 85,733 | 85,096 | 81,976 |
| 18-20 | ||||||||||
| Violent offences | 16,161 | 15,798 | 14,604 | 14,433 | 14,653 | 8,429 | 8,129 | 8,520 | 8,821 | 9,449 |
| Non-violent offences | 204,813 | 205,968 | 191,682 | 174,739 | 165,256 | 151,361 | 154,359 | 148,231 | 137,806 | 133,612 |
| 21 and over | ||||||||||
| Violent offences | 66,813 | 68,049 | 60,914 | 57,853 | 53,953 | 31,139 | 31,897 | 32,438 | 32,938 | 33,708 |
| Non-violent offences | 1,477,315 | 1,556,205 | 1,603,373 | 1,502,837 | 1,408,127 | 1,126,727 | 1,194,295 | 1,252,609 | 1,199,530 | 1,143,315 |
| All ages | ||||||||||
| Violent offences | 103,192 | 102,465 | 93,735 | 90,409 | 87,063 | 49,803 | 49,694 | 51,415 | 52,820 | 54,870 |
| Non-violent offences | 1,808,478 | 1,884,345 | 1,913,500 | 1,791,184 | 1,681,115 | 1,362,399 | 1,431,527 | 1,486,573 | 1,422,432 | 1,358,903 |
| ¹ Data are on the principal offence basis. | ||||||||||
| ² Data includes the following offence types: | ||||||||||
| Violent offences: | ||||||||||
| Violence against the person | ||||||||||
| Sexual Offences | ||||||||||
| Robbery | ||||||||||
| Non-violent offences: | ||||||||||
| Burglary | ||||||||||
| Theft and handling stolen goods | ||||||||||
| Fraud and forgery | ||||||||||
| Criminal damage | ||||||||||
| Drug offences | ||||||||||
| Other indictable offences | ||||||||||
| Indictable motoring offences | ||||||||||
| Summary offences (excluding motoring) | ||||||||||
| Summary motoring offences. | ||||||||||
| ³ Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts, other agencies and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. | ||||||||||
| Sources: | ||||||||||
| Court proceedings data held by CJEAU | ||||||||||
| Office for Criminal Justice Reform | ||||||||||
| Ministry of Justice |
| Number of persons arrested for recorded crime (notifiable offences) by age group and type of offence¹, 2001-02 to 2005-06, England and Wales | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rounded | ||||||
| Notifiable offence group | Aged under 10 | Aged 10-17 | Aged 18-20 | Aged 21 and over | Age unknown | All ages |
| 2001-02 | ||||||
| Violent offences | 100 | 70,500 | 47,900 | 201,400 | 900 | 320,500 |
| Other offences | 400 | 243,800 | 160,300 | 544,200 | 2,500 | 951,400 |
| Total | 500 | 314,200 | 208,100 | 745,700 | 3,400 | 1,271,900 |
| 2002-03 | ||||||
| Violent offences | 100 | 70,600 | 50,800 | 226,600 | 900 | 348,700 |
| Other offences | 300 | 229,000 | 156,300 | 576,500 | 2,200 | 964,400 |
| Total | 500 | 299,500 | 207,000 | 803,200 | 2,900 | 1,313,100 |
| 2003-04 | ||||||
| Violent offences | 100 | 83,000 | 56,900 | 256,000 | 900 | 396,800 |
| Other offences | 500 | 230,300 | 145,200 | 555,600 | 1,900 | 933,800 |
| Total | 700 | 313,200 | 202,200 | 811,700 | 2,700 | 1,330,400 |
| 2004-05² | ||||||
| Violent offences | 200 | 96,700 | 66,800 | 294,000 | 900 | 458,400 |
| Other offences | 500 | 236,100 | 137,000 | 519,500 | 1,900 | 894,900 |
| Total | 800 | 332,800 | 203,700 | 813,400 | 2,800 | 1,353,400 |
| 2005-06 | ||||||
| Violent offences | 200 | 108,500 | 74,500 | 331,800 | 800 | 515,800 |
| Other offences | 500 | 239,900 | 140,300 | 531,100 | 2,000 | 914,000 |
| Total | 800 | 348,500 | 214,700 | 863,100 | 2,700 | 1,429,800 |
| ¹ Violent offences includes the offence categories of: violence against the person; sexual offences; robbery offences. Other offences includes the offence categories of: burglary; theft and handling stolen goods; fraud and forgery; criminal damage; drug offences; other offences. | ||||||
| ² Figures updated since publication of 2004-05 bulletin. | ||||||
| Note: | ||||||
| Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when these data are used. |
Subjects
Crime; Young people
Date
25 June 2008
Reference
478 c331-4W;478 c333-6W; 212374
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what powers (a) the police and (b) other authorities have to deal with unsolicited car windscreen washers; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what powers (a) the police and (b) other authorities have to deal with unsolicited car windscreen washers; and if she will make a statement.
Asked by
Baroness Featherstone
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Coaker
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
15 May 2008
For answer on
19 May 2008
Answered on
2 June 2008
Police and local authorities have available a range of measures to deal with antisocial behaviour, including the nuisance caused by unsolicited car windscreen washers. The measures are usually employed incrementally and it is important that they should be proportionate to the behaviour concerned. Among the available measures normally used for low-level antisocial behaviour are warnings, acceptable behaviour contracts (ABCs), and injunctions. For more serious cases, antisocial behaviour orders (ASBOs) may be used. In addition, the police have powers to disperse groups of two or more where their presence or behaviour has resulted, or is likely to result, in a member of the public being harassed, intimidated, alarmed or distressed. These could be used where more than person is engaged in unsolicited windscreen washing in a particular location.
Subjects
Anti-social behaviour
Date
2 June 2008
Reference
476 c744W; 206831
House
House of Commons