1-1 of 1 results for subject:"Rural development programme"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.197 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Rural development programme"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Rural development programme" OR subject_ses:297572
Primary member
X
Griffiths, Win
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Griffiths, Win (1)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what areas are designated as urban and rural for determining financial allocations and other departmental purposes; and what changes have taken place in the areas so designated over the last 20 years. - Inc ref to Indices...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what areas are designated as urban and rural for determining financial allocations and other departmental purposes; and what changes have taken place in the areas so designated over the last 20 years. - Inc ref to Indices...
Asked by
Win Griffiths
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Hughes of Stretford
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
11 January 2001
For answer on
22 January 2001
Answered on
22 January 2001
Mr. Win Griffiths: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what areas are designated as urban
and rural for determining financial allocations and other departmental purposes; and what changes have taken place in the areas so
designated over the last 20 years. [145837]
Ms Beverley Hughes: The Indices of Deprivation 2000 (ID 2000), which were published last August, provide tools to identify the most
deprived areas in England which may be used in determining the allocation of funding of regeneration policies. The ID 2000 provide
scores and ranks in terms of how deprived they are for all areas in England regardless of whether they are urban or rural. Previous
indices were published in 1981, 1994 and 1998.
Changes have occurred to the way the indices have been constructed over the years. This has included more direct ways of measuring
deprivation rather than using proxy indicators and the move away from using census data that become quickly out of date. Also
methodologies have been reviewed and changed so that they more fairly identify areas regardless of size which suffer from
deprivation. Methodologies have also changed to ensure that no, or lack of, deprivation on some indicators is not completely
cancelled out by high levels of deprivation on other indicators.
The ID 2000 have identified several deprived areas which previous indices have failed to pick up on. Many districts in the former
coalfield areas, old industrial areas and rural areas are now identified as suffering widespread deprivation. They reveal patterns
of deprivation for every ward and local authority district in the country. There is no one method of distinguishing which areas
should be eligible for funding against those that should not. In order to target resources on the most deprived areas, it is
proposed that the ID 2000 are used. These have identified 88 areas which should be eligible for the new Neighbourhood Renewal Fund
recently announced by the Government. Table 1 shows the areas and this has been placed in the Libraries of the House.
As part of the former Urban Programme, which was the core of the former Department of the Environment's programme to tackle urban
deprivation and ran in the 1980s through to the mid 1990s, 57 Urban Priority Areas were designated. Table 2 shows the areas and
again the list has been placed in the Libraries of the House. These areas were targeted for their particular problems mainly in
terms of economic and environmental issues but also in terms of social and housing deprivation.
Rural Development Areas, now known as Rural Priority Areas, were first designated in 1984. A comprehensive review was carried out by
the Rural Development Commission before these areas were designated in 1994 but details of the previous areas are not held
centrally. With minor exceptions, all Regional Development Agency rural development programme funding is spent in these areas. Those
local authority districts containing wards which fall within Rural Priority Areas are at table 3 and has been placed in the
Libraries of the House.
Certain areas have also been designated as being rural for the purposes of the village shop rate relief scheme. The number of
designated areas runs into several thousands. These areas can be found in the following Statutory Instruments: SI 1997 No. 620--The
Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the West Midlands) Order 1997. SI 1997 No. 621--The Housing
(Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the South West) Order 1997. SI 1997 No. 622--The Housing (Right to
Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North West and Merseyside) Order 1997. SI 1997 No. 623--The Housing (Right to
Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the East) Order 1997. SI 1997 No. 624--The Housing (Right to Acquire or
Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997. SI 1997 No. 625--The Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise)
(Designated Rural Areas in the South East) Order 1997. SI 1997 No. 2792--The Non-Domestic Rating (Rural Settlements) (England) Order
1997. SI 1998 No. 393--The Non-Domestic Rating (Rural Settlements) (England) Order 1998. SI 1998 No. 2836--The Non-Domestic Rating
(Rural Settlements) (England) (No. 2) Order 1998. SI 1999 No. 3158--The Non-Domestic Rating (Rural Settlements) (England) Order
1999.
In addition, Standard Spending Assessments (SSAs), which are the Government's method for allocating Revenue Support Grant, currently
use three measures of population density and two of population sparsity based on the 1991 Census. These measures calculate density
and levels of sparsity for all local authorities. No dividing line is set to indicate which authorities are rural and which urban,
all authorities have a degree of both sparsity and density. The use of these indicators within the SSA formulae is complex and has
changed several times since the inception of SSAs for financial year 1990-91. Details of their use can be found in the Local
Government Finance Report for each year.
Subjects
Disadvantaged; Finance; Local government; Rural areas; Urban areas; Standard spending assessments; Deprivation indicators; Social conditions; Rural development programme
Date
22 January 2001
Reference
361 c453-5W;361 c454-6W; 145837
House
House of Commons